Federal

Smith To Leave Education Department in January

By Joetta L. Sack — November 17, 1999 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Acting Deputy Secretary of Education Marshall S. Smith announced his resignation last week, following months of rumors about his impending departure.

Mr. Smith, a key figure in the crafting of the Clinton education agenda since the beginning of the administration, is expected to remain at the Department of Education until January. He plans to return to Stanford University in California early next year to resume his academic career.

The day after Mr. Smith disclosed his plans, President Clinton announced his intention to nominate Frank S. Holleman III, a Greenville, S.C., lawyer, to fill the vacancy. Mr. Holleman also served as the chief of staff to Secretary of Education Richard W. Riley from 1994 to 1997.

In his nearly seven years at the Education Department, Mr. Smith, 62, has earned a reputation as a detail-oriented negotiator and solid day-to-day manager of the agency’s affairs. “Mike Smith exemplifies the best in public service, and I am proud to have had him in my administration,” Mr. Clinton said in a written statement.

Mr. Smith, who began his service in the Clinton administration in 1993 as the undersecretary of education, was promoted to acting deputy secretary more than three years ago. But during his tenure as the department’s second-in-command, Mr. Smith has never been able to shed the word “acting” from his title. Senate Republicans vehemently opposed his nomination to the deputy’s post on a permanent basis, in large part because of his support for national academic standards and testing. The Senate declined to vote on his nomination for nearly 21/2 years.

In an interview last week, Mr. Smith said his service as deputy secretary was not affected by lack of a Senate confirmation. “It would have been nice to have been confirmed. I would have liked to have had a hearing to confront whatever issues there were ... but the Senate decided not to,” he said. “As a matter of day-to-day operations, I didn’t think about it very much.”

The question never seemed to be where he would go after his term at the Education Department, but when he would leave. For instance, in 1996, it was rumored that his name appeared in Stanford University’s schedule of classes.

Now, as President Clinton’s second term winds down, Mr. Smith’s return to academe has seemed inevitable, education lobbyists here say.

After the Education Department’s announcement on Nov. 9, some education groups praised Mr. Smith’s work in such areas as standards, technology, and accountability.

“The guy left his mark,” said Bruce Hunter, the chief lobbyist for the American Association of School Administrators. “He came to town to promote standards and assessment, and he did just that.”

A ‘Lightning Rod’

But many Republicans opposed his plans to mandate standards and accountability from the federal level. Mr. Smith was a chief architect of the much-maligned White House proposal to create voluntary
new national tests of student achievement and drafted the Goals 2000 law that provided financial incentives for states to create standards and assessments. He took much of the heat for those controversial plans, while his boss, Mr. Riley, remained friendly with many congressional Republicans.

The GOP leaders of both congressional education committees, Sen. James M. Jeffords of Vermont and Rep. Bill Goodling of Pennsylvania, declined to comment on his departure.

“He was clearly the chief strategist for the Education Department, in terms of both formulating the agenda and strategy,” said Diane Ravitch, a prominent education scholar and a former assistant secretary of education under President Bush. “That would tend to make him a lightning rod, but he did his job superbly.”

The Senate— then controlled by Democrats—did confirm Mr. Smith to serve as undersecretary in 1993, allowing him to fill what was then the number-three spot at the Education Department. When Deputy Secretary Madeleine M. Kunin left in 1996, he took her job in an acting capacity.

Before his Education Department service, Mr. Smith was the dean of the school of education at Stanford. He also served as an adviser to the National Education Goals Panel and was chief of staff in the Department of Education in the Carter administration.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the November 17, 1999 edition of Education Week as Smith To Leave Education Department in January

Events

Budget & Finance Webinar Creative Approaches to K-12 Budget Realities
What are districts prioritizing in 2026? New survey data reveals emerging K-12 budgeting trends.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
College & Workforce Readiness Webinar
From Coursework to Careers: Expanding Work-Based Learning and Industry Credentials in CTE
Expand work-based learning and industry credentials in CTE to connect classroom learning with real careers and prepare students for future success.
Content provided by Project Lead The Way
College & Workforce Readiness Webinar Data-Driven and District-Ready: What EdWeek Research Tells Us About the CTE Market
Discover how to sharpen your positioning in a fast-moving market of CTE with actionable strategies grounded in EdWeek Research Center data.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Federal Interactive Feds Issue a Slimmed-Down Data Release on U.S. Schools
The Condition of Education highlights school enrollment, finance, and graduation data.
Image of blurry data and a school building.
Laura Baker/Education Week + Canva
Federal Opinion We Need Better Data to Understand What Happens to Students After High School
Here are the two things we need before we can answer how well we’re preparing students.
Jennifer Bell-Ellwanger & Sara Schapiro
4 min read
Future data arrow concept with student looking out to a tangle of possibilities. Choice. grow chart up decisions. Pathways.
Vanessa Solis/Education Week + Getty
Federal Opinion How the Institute of Education Sciences Could Better Serve Schools
“It’s been all over the place,” explains the scholar tasked with reimagining IES.
4 min read
The United States Capitol building as a bookcase filled with red, white, and blue policy books in a Washington DC landscape.
Luca D'Urbino for Education Week
Federal Senate Days Are Numbered for Top Republican Charged With Ed. Dept. Oversight
Sen. Bill Cassidy was vying for a third term in the Senate but lost his primary over the weekend.
4 min read
Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., right, hugs a supporter during an election night watch party Saturday, May 16, 2026, in Baton Rouge, La.
Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., right, hugs a supporter during an election night watch party on Saturday, May 16, 2026, in Baton Rouge, La. Cassidy leads the Senate committee charged with education policy. He was vying for a third Senate term but lost his primary over the weekend.
Gerald Herbert/AP