Shift in Regional Education Labs’ Role Stirs Concern

By Debra Viadero — March 13, 2007 5 min read

Since the mid-1960s, a far-flung system of regional laboratories has served as the federal government’s bridge between research and practice in education.

Until recently, many of those labs had been run by the same organizations since the program’s inception. Education administrators had long called on the labs for professional-development programs, management help, research reviews, and various other expert services.

Those long-standing relationships were jolted last spring, however, when the Institute of Education Sciences, the arm of the U.S. Department of Education that oversees the labs, announced the results of its latest laboratory competition.

Under the new five-year contracts, the 10 regional labs received new missions, and in four cases, new operators. Their new charge is to spend more time doing slow, careful, and rigorous education research and less time on some of the constituent services that some educators in the field had been used to getting.

Now, nearly a year later, the shift in focus is prompting complaints from some longtime customers.

Those practitioners say they support the Education Department’s efforts to nurture better-quality studies in education. But that kind of research takes time, they note, and with state and federal accountability deadlines looming, such educators say time is a luxury they don’t have.

Polly Feis

“It’s like the labs have been shrink-wrapped into this research mode,” said Polly Feis, Nebraska’s deputy commissioner of education and a member of the governing board for the Central Regional Education Laboratory, which has long been run by Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning, in Denver. “We’ve been so used to getting quality expert responses from them quickly, so it’s kind of like we’re left without something.”

Rigor vs. Relevance

The Nebraska educator was among a number of governing-board members from around the country who voiced concerns about the labs’ change in emphasis during a meeting last month in Washington with IES officials.

Federal Regional Educational Laboratories

The U.S. Department of Education contracts with private organizations to run 10 regional education labs charged with disseminating research findings, undertaking their own long-term studies, and conducting short-term research projects.

*Click image to see the full chart.


SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education

Tensions have not cropped up in every federal-laboratory region. But an informal survey by Education Week suggests that laboratory governing-board members in at least four regions have concerns about the labs’ change in direction.

In fact, the board for WestEd, the San Francisco-based lab that serves Arizona, California, Nevada, and Utah, passed a resolution on the subject at its regular meeting in January.

Urging that “rigor not compromise relevance,” the resolution called on staff members at the regional education lab “to work with IES to assure relevance as defined by the region and increase timeliness of delivery as well as rigor.”

Institute officials, for their part, said the concerns may be a temporary part of the transition for the labs as they grow accustomed to their new missions.

The stepped-up emphasis on rigorous research grows out of the institute’s campaign—a priority for the Bush administration—to foster more education studies that are “scientifically based.” Through studies seen as more scientifically credible, federal officials hope to transform the field into an “evidence based” practice akin to medicine.

Officials say the labs also have to assume new roles to avoid duplicating the work of the federally financed network of 20 regionally based comprehensive-assistance centers. The centers were created two years ago to advise states and districts on complying with the No Child Left Behind Act and offer technical assistance in specialized areas, such as special education.

“I think it’s a question of adjusting and trying to understand what the new regional-education-laboratory program is,” said Phoebe H. Cottingham, the commissioner of the National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, which oversees the lab system for the IES. “We expect the labs will come to know what their niche is.”

Phoebe H. Cottingham

Under their new contracts, the labs must divide their time equally among three activities: dissemination, research, and rapid-response projects. The last category refers to studies that can be turned around in 12 months.

The problem, some members of the regional labs’ governing boards say, is that “rapid response” hasn’t been rapid enough. None of the 60 projects begun in the labs’ first contract year has yet been published, according to federal research officials. Ms. Cottingham said most of those projects are in review; 10 to 12 have yet to be submitted.

“It’s great to have all this rigorous research, but we would also like quick response to be quick response,” said Deanna D. Winn, who chairs WestEd’s board and recently retired from her job as associate commissioner for higher education in Utah.

The slowdown stems in part from new requirements that applied to the new laboratory contracts, including one that all lab-produced studies had to be vetted by outside peer-review panels twice—once in the beginning to get the proposals approved and again once the studies had been completed.

Under another federal directive, rapid-response projects were required to be completed within a contract year. That led some labs to postpone study requests that came too late to be completed by the contract year’s end.

In response to the concerns about timeliness, the Institute of Education Sciences in recent weeks changed its rules to allow rapid-response projects to straddle two contract years.

In addition, lab researchers may now release a small percentage of rapid-response studies before they are peer-reviewed, Ms. Cottingham said. Instead, those reports can now be vetted at the end of the contract year, when the labs undergo general performance reviews.

‘Decisions in a Vacuum’

Ms. Cottingham said the lab system plans to set up a centralized “reference desk” for practitioners and policymakers who want to know what research says about a particular topic.

The IES is also producing practice guides that will synthesize the “best available evidence”—rigorous studies, studies that fall short of that benchmark, and practitioner wisdom—and add another layer of practical help.

“It is true that maybe in the past, for instance, more attention was paid in the labs to running seminars for teachers, but there are now many people who do professional-development services,” Ms. Cottingham said. “Now the focus is on what do we know about professional-development strategies.”

Whether the recent IES efforts will address board members’ concerns in all 10 regions remains to be seen.

“They’re a step in the right direction,” said David V. Abbott, the deputy commissioner of the Rhode Island Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. He sits on the governing board for the Northeast and Islands Regional Education Laboratory, run by the Newton, Mass.-based Education Development Center, which wants more flexibility for the labs.

“We don’t need it to be perfect,” he added. “We just need more answers than we currently have, because we’re out here making decisions in a vacuum.”

Coverage of education research is supported in part by a grant from the Spencer Foundation.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the March 14, 2007 edition of Education Week as Shift in Regional Education Labs’ Role Stirs Concern


This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Student Well-Being Webinar
Measuring & Supporting Student Well-Being: A Researcher and District Leader Roundtable
Students’ social-emotional well-being matters. The positive and negative emotions students feel are essential characteristics of their psychology, indicators of their well-being, and mediators of their success in school and life. Supportive relationships with peers, school
Content provided by Panorama Education
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
School & District Management Webinar
Making Digital Literacy a Priority: An Administrator’s Perspective
Join us as we delve into the efforts of our panelists and their initiatives to make digital skills a “must have” for their district. We’ll discuss with district leadership how they have kept digital literacy
Content provided by Learning.com
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
School & District Management Webinar
How Schools Can Implement Safe In-Person Learning
In order for in-person schooling to resume, it will be necessary to instill a sense of confidence that it is safe to return. BD is hosting a virtual panel discussing the benefits of asymptomatic screening
Content provided by BD

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Federal Miguel Cardona: Schools Must Work to Win Trust of Families of Color as They Reopen
As Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona announced new school reopening resources, he encouraged a focus on equity and student engagement.
4 min read
Education Secretary nominee Miguel Cardona testifies before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions committee during his confirmation hearing Feb. 3, 2021.
Now-U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona testifies before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions committee during his confirmation hearing in February.
Susan Walsh/AP
Federal CDC: Nearly 80 Percent of K-12, Child-Care Workers Have Had at Least One COVID-19 Shot
About four out of five teachers, school staffers, and child-care workers had first COVID-19 vaccine doses by the end of March, CDC says.
2 min read
John Battle High School teacher Jennifer Daniel receives her COVID-19 vaccine on Jan. 11, 2021. Teachers received their first vaccine during an all-day event at the Virginia Highlands Higher Education Center in Abingdon, Va.
John Battle High School teacher Jennifer Daniel receives her COVID-19 vaccine on Jan. 11at the Virginia Highlands Higher Education Center in Abingdon, Va.
David Crigger/Bristol Herald Courier via AP
Federal Ed. Dept. to Review Title IX Rules on Sexual Assault, Gender Equity, LGBTQ Rights
The review could reopen a Trump-era debate on sexual assault in schools, and it could spark legal discord over transgender student rights.
4 min read
Symbols of gender.
Federal Q&A EdWeek Q&A: Miguel Cardona Talks Summer Learning, Mental Health, and State Tests
In an interview after a school reopening summit, the education secretary also addressed teachers' union concerns about CDC guidance.
10 min read
Education Secretary Miguel Cardona speaks during a press briefing at the White House on March 17, 2021.
U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona speaks during a press briefing at the White House on March 17.
Andrew Harnik/AP