Opinion
Federal Opinion

What Is the Value of a Blue Ribbon School?

By Ted Kesler — September 13, 2016 5 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

As anyone who works in education knows, the quality of our schools matters. High-quality schools have the power to affect the demographics and property values of their communities and can provide effective ways to guide students out of cycles of poverty. In recent years, the Blue Ribbon Schools Program has served as one national indicator of some of the most successful schools in the country.

The U.S. Department of Education created the Blue Ribbons Schools Program in 1982 to recognize public and private schools that achieve high levels of academic excellence and make substantial progress toward closing the achievement gap for all students. Several hundred schools receive the award annually, with more than 8,000 recipients across the country since the program began. The designation does not expire, but schools must indicate the year they received the award, and the program encourages schools to reapply after five years.

What Is the Value of a Blue Ribbon School? The Blue Ribbon Schools Program could offer schools more than just recognition, writes Queens College’s Ted Kesler. Image from Getty.

These schools, which serve as outstanding models of excellence for their states in an otherwise disjointed education system, benefit from more than just a title. According to the Education Department, the designation can lead to partnerships with local businesses and community volunteers as well as financial help. Principals and school leaders may receive invitations to present at state and regional meetings about their most effective practices for students and faculty. District and state educators may visit schools to learn about strategies for leadership and instruction.

As a professor of education who provides professional development for three public elementary and middle schools in New York with Blue Ribbon designations, I have witnessed teachers’ and administrators’ commitment to academic excellence for all students. Each school prominently displays its status in its building. But I have noticed that the designation does not account for changes that may occur after the award is given, such as faculty turnover, new mandates, and curricula that affect educational practices; changes in student population or funding for programs in the arts or sciences; or other factors that have an impact on overall school performance.

When I ask educators at these schools what the status continues to signify, they admit that after an awards ceremony in Washington, it’s back to the day-to-day work of trying to run an excellent school. There seems to be no way to measure whether the practices that earned a school its award are still in place.

Moreover, with no follow-up from the federal Education Department after designation, the high-quality practices that these schools achieve and the opportunities that come with the award may peter out. This seems to be a squandered opportunity to help excellent schools sustain their status and harness their expertise as a model for others.

At the national level, Blue Ribbon schools could serve as mentors to the wider world of K-12 education."

This is why the federal department, state and local leaders in education, and their award-winning schools should revise the program to more effectively build capacity for excellence in school systems and account for schools’ sustainability of that capacity. Michael Fullan, a leading scholar on school reform, defines capacity-building as “actions that lead to an increase in the collective power of a group to improve student achievement, especially by raising the bar and closing the gap for all students.” Fullan believes that to sustain schools’ development, they need nurture from an external infrastructure—one that invests in professional development, teacher training, and ongoing support.

To build sustainability within some of our nation’s most excellent schools, I recommend making the Blue Ribbon program a five-year renewable plan with an advanced designation. Renewing schools would need to acquire their state or institutional governing bodies’ recommendations by showing not only how they sustained excellence, but also how they developed at least one area of expertise—such as integrating technology, incorporating multicultural children’s literature, or developing collaborative learning and strong discussion practices in the classroom. Only then would states recommend renewal for a school’s advanced designation.

As one example for improvement at the local level, school administrators in New York state want to support teachers in developing stronger discourse practices, and one of the Blue Ribbon schools where I work consistently demonstrates a high level of classroom discourse.

Imagine if this school could share this expertise. A nearby school that needs guidance could sign up for mentorship. District leaders might organize a group of schools with this need to develop common goals and a plan of action, including ways to monitor improvement and schedule visits with Blue Ribbon schools that can illustrate successful efforts.

Federal and state leaders could also prvide grant funding for advanced schools to harness their expertise through national and local partnerships, such as those between a school district and a nearby college of teacher education. These K-12 schools could become sites for initial preservice field experience and student teaching, with experienced teachers also serving as guest lecturers for college courses.

At the national level, Blue Ribbon schools could serve as mentors to the wider world of K-12 education. Other schools seeking development in a particular area of need could sign up for mentorship programs with awardees. Teachers in schools with advanced designation could lead webinars and conduct study groups; grant money could be used to develop and implement these virtual opportunities.

Many proponents of K-12 change consider creating high-quality schools with sustainable capacity-building the biggest equity issue in education. Through collaborative structures, my recommendations assure ongoing learning and continual improvement of practices in Blue Ribbon schools. Improvements to the program could build structures that encourage schools to learn from each other and ensure deep, distributed learning. A stronger infrastructure for excellent schools is one step to building K-12 equity for all students.

Events

Special Education Webinar Reading, Dyslexia, and Equity: Best Practices for Addressing a Threefold Challenge
Learn about proven strategies for instruction and intervention that support students with dyslexia.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Families & the Community Webinar
How Whole-Child Student Data Can Strengthen Family Connections
Learn how district leaders can use these actionable strategies to increase family engagement in their student’s education and boost their academic achievement.
Content provided by Panorama Education
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
College & Workforce Readiness Webinar
The School to Workforce Gap: How Are Schools Setting Students Up For Life & Lifestyle Success?
Hear from education and business leaders on how schools are preparing students for their leap into the workforce.
Content provided by Find Your Grind

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Federal What the Federal 'Don't Say Gay' Bill Actually Says
The bill would restrict federal funds for lessons on LGBTQ identities. The outcome of this week's election could revive its prospects.
4 min read
Demonstrators gather on the steps of the Florida Historic Capitol Museum in front of the Florida State Capitol on March 7, 2022, in Tallahassee, Fla. Florida House Republicans advanced a bill, dubbed by opponents as the "Don't Say Gay" bill, to forbid discussions of sexual orientation and gender identity in schools, rejecting criticism from Democrats who said the proposal demonizes LGBTQ people.
Demonstrators gather on the steps of the Florida Historic Capitol Museum in Tallahassee on March 7, 2022. Florida's "Don't Say Gay" law was a model for a federal bill introduced last month.
Wilfredo Lee/AP
Federal Fed's Education Research Board Is Back. Here's Why That Matters
Defunct for years, the National Board for Education Sciences has new members and new priorities.
2 min read
Image of a conference table.
vasabii/iStock/Getty
Federal Opinion NAEP Needs to Be Kept at Arm’s Length From Politics
It’s in all our interests to ensure NAEP releases are buffered from political considerations and walled off from political appointees.
4 min read
Image shows a multi-tailed arrow hitting the bullseye of a target.
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
Federal Feds Emphasize Legal Protections for Pregnant or Recently Pregnant Students, Employees
The U.S. Department of Education has released a new resource summary related to pregnancy discrimination in schools.
2 min read
Young girl checking her pregnancy test, sitting on beige couch at home.
iStock/Getty Images Plus