Opinion
Federal Opinion

The Booming Business of English-Language Learning: Dollars Don’t Always Make Sense

By Kaitlin E. Thomas — December 19, 2014 4 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

International students and their families bring millions of dollars not only to U.S. higher education institutions, but also the communities they are located in. (Visit MappingtheNation.net to see at a glance how much they contribute to your state or county). Yet Kaitlin Thomas, Visiting Instructor of Spanish & ELL at Washington College and Instructor of Spanish at Johns Hopkins University Center for Talented Youth, wonders if we provide these students with the supports they need to succeed in our system.

Have you noticed a change in college campus demographics? Teachers, is there a distinct international presence that was not previously as prevalent in your classes? Do you find that you’re dealing with learning challenges that have much more to do with English being a second language than thematic content comprehension? If so, welcome to the new face of higher education in the United States, one with a distinct international (and more specifically Asian) flair.

A Big Investment
Of the figures available to explain such an increase in international student presence, there are perhaps two facts most worth extracting, particularly when considering the plight of small, liberal arts, American colleges who often do not have sufficient resources, personnel, and facilities to serve their new international student clientele. First, according to the 2014 Open Doors Report on International Education, 50% of the 886,052 international students in 2013-14 hailed from China, South Korea, or India; and second (pay attention here), about 65% of this group pay out of pocket, leveraging personal and family financial sources to cover costs.

When we consider how expensive post-secondary education is, and again hone in on the small liberal arts institutions that are often astronomical in price, this could be an investment of hundreds of thousands of dollars given that international students are often exempt from domestic scholarships and financial aid. Consequently, Chinese, Korean, and Indian students are paying full freight to earn a degree that will allegedly be a game-changer upon graduating—the adage of an American degree being an influential and important key to opening doors, resonates perhaps even more strongly with Asian students, families, and employers.

So What‘s the Problem?
On the surface it appears that the American college system has determined a way to “fix” what seems to be an ongoing paradox of survival. If college is simply too expensive for domestic students who aren’t applying, attending, or finishing degrees with as much gusto as in the past, why not turn to a market that is not yet saturated by academic and professional disenchantment, and financial inability?

The issue here is twofold. Many Asian students coming to study in the U.S. for a four-year degree were informed of programs and opportunities by way of a middle man—the recruiter—whose purpose is to sell the school’s reputation, its limitless possibilities, and guaranteed admission. “Truth and accuracy?” Throw them out the window. “Proficiency assessment?” Flexible, we can figure it out later. “How much?” Well, what’s a number really when we’re talking about your future as an eventual wealthy, successful, American college graduate?

Because of the financial stakes being wagered, too often students and families are able to dictate what they will and will not do simply because they can (indeed, a potential $250,000 earning off of one student would convince any administrator that concessions can, of course, be made). As a result, the balance of power shifts, and students arrive on campus expecting more of the same. When classes inevitably become difficult and deadlines come and go, negotiating exceptions seems not only possible, but also a right guaranteed by having done it before.

Too many students are being admitted with a misperception of what their second language proficiencies are (the fault of which is often not their own, but rather the salespeople selling the dream), and are inserted into situations that are minimally able, at best, to provide English as a second language support in such a specific and academically nuanced way. Lecture comprehension, note-taking, and daily readings all instigate the proverbial domino effect, leading to a brutal psychological onslaught of pressure, failure, and culture shock compounded by negative perceptions held by professors who often feel that, yet again, they do not know how to work with or help a student. Passing grades are given because it’s easier, or failing grades are given because there’s no alternative, neither scenario of which is productive for anyone involved.

Returns on Investment
If these 886,052 students are investing in us, the American college system, wouldn’t it be wise to invest in the programs, faculty, and curriculum that can ensure their success? Having witnessed how one liberal arts college is in a situation of relying on the revenue paid by this 65%, showing no sign of slowing down international recruitment, the urgency to better confront and anticipate academic and social issues that such students will encounter has become paramount to student success and faculty perspective. Without the development of “English for academic purpose” curriculums, which specifically target the academic challenges unique to independent and intensive environments such as a liberal arts school, students will only continue to transfer to larger universities where they are able to disappear in the masses, seek assistance at established English institutes, or even worse, perpetuate a different type of disenchantment by dropping out and giving up on this new American (college) dream.

Follow Asia Society on Twitter.

Related Tags:

The opinions expressed in Global Learning are strictly those of the author(s) and do not reflect the opinions or endorsement of Editorial Projects in Education, or any of its publications.

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Professional Development Webinar
Grow Leaders, Keep Teachers: Leadership Development as a Staffing Strategy
Find out how to turn leadership development into a staffing strategy and grow your next generation of school leaders from within.
Content provided by Frontline Education
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Teaching Webinar
Closing the Practice Gap: Essential Insights for Leaders
Three instructional experts will share strategies for making students’ reading and math practice more engaging and impactful this year.
Content provided by Renaissance
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
The Principal's Role in Collective Efficacy and Student Outcomes
Learn practical strategies that help principals translate their confidence into stronger collective teacher efficacy and student outcomes.
Content provided by Otus

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Federal Senate Panel Advances Bill to Block Much of Trump Admin.’s Ed. Dept. Dismantling
The bill pushes back, but only partially, against Trump's efforts to end the 46-year-old department.
5 min read
DFreeman EDW CH 041
U.S. Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., listens as Sen. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., speaks during a Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee session on July 30, 2026 in the U.S. Capitol in Washington. The committee voted to advance a measure that would block many of the Trump administration's transfers of Education Department programs to other agencies.
Demetrius Freeman for Education Week
Federal Ed. Dept. Shifts Civil Rights to the Justice Dept.: What It Means for Schools
The office for civil rights has already changed dramatically. What more will change in the Justice Dept.?
13 min read
EL 20260717 EducationWeekAFT109
The Department of Education headquarters in Washington on July 17, 2026. The Trump administration has been transferring day-to-day management of the agency's programs to other Cabinet-level departments. The administration recently announced the transfer of its civil rights enforcement arm to the Department of Justice.
Eric Lee for Education Week
Federal K-12 Community Urges Trump Administration to Rethink Grant Rule Changes
About 500,000 public comments, including those from school districts, have poured in about proposed rule changes.
8 min read
Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought testifies during a House Appropriations subcommittee hearing on Capitol Hill, Tuesday, June 30, 2026, in Washington.
Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought testifies during a House Appropriations subcommittee hearing on Capitol Hill, on June 30, 2026, in Washington. Proposed changes to federal administration of grants have raised concerns among school groups.
Mariam Zuhaib/AP
Federal The Ed. Department Calls for a Crackdown on Teacher Sexual Misconduct
The agency released new guidance for schools and launched 20 new probes into school districts.
Collage of a school building, files, maps, and pinpoints on the map.
Collage by Laura Baker/Education Week + Canva