Opinion
Federal Opinion

Let’s Stop the K-12 Bickering

By Judy Seltz — October 27, 2014 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

It has become increasingly difficult to talk without disdain and disappointment about the way America makes education policy. We who work in education often lament today’s poisonous politics.

The national education conversation should elevate the importance of students and link their future to academic results. Who should be leading this chorus? That would be us—the people who work in education. And when our actions fall far short of our aspirations, we should not blame someone else.

I would like to admonish those of us caught up in this toxicity rather than leading the way out of it. Instead, we need to offer another path. After more than 30 years in various corners of education, from teaching to writing to leading ASCD, I would like to think that students and schools are in a better place.

BRIC ARCHIVE

Yet, the place they are—we are—in now is not good enough. The urgency is real. And collectively, we are letting America’s students down. Too many students are not finishing high school, and too many of those who do finish are ill-prepared for college or work. Far too many are unengaged and uninterested for too many of their years in school.

Our teachers are whipsawed. They are underpaid and undervalued. We talk about their importance, but act as if we do not trust their judgment.

Our education leaders are bombarded with new policies, told to adopt the efficiencies and data systems of corporations, and increasingly sold new technology and materials with top-notch marketing campaigns, but of questionable efficacy.

If we care about kids—<i>all kids</i>—then we need to actually listen to one another."

Our policymakers—governors, legislators, mayors, and school board members—have largely sorted themselves into partisan camps, with little interest in consensus or compromise. Genuine debate is rare. Conversations are shouted. And thoughtful solutions or respectful governing seem out of reach.

But the students who are back in school this fall aren’t waiting for the results of November’s elections or contemplating when Congress might actually act on education or immigration. Their lives go on, and far too quickly. Meanwhile, adults bicker and dither and explain how hard it is to make improvements in the current climate.

Learning has never been more critical. Economic success is dependent on deep knowledge and refined skills. And we are better citizens and neighbors if we can understand a range of complex ideas, articulate our own views, and hear those of others.

If we care about kids—all kids—then we need to actually listen to one another and deal with our shared values rather than entrench ourselves in political divides.

As a nation, we need to update our federal education laws. It has been more than a dozen contentious years since the signing of the No Child Left Behind Act in 2002. We’ve learned a lot, but NCLB is out of date, and states and schools are spending far too much time working around it or feeling handcuffed by it.

States need to stop fighting over the manufactured common-core conspiracy and focus on real rigor for students. Communities need to support good teachers and effective teaching.

But it starts with us—all of us—being willing to turn political rants into conversations about children, and how to help all of them succeed.

We can complain about what Congress hasn’t done or about the Obama administration appearing to be tone-deaf. We can complain about talk-show hosts who blend a noxious mix of pseudo-patriotism with conspiracy theories. We can complain about those who defend the status quo.

Or we can change the conversation and focus squarely on what students need. And we can push those who devolve into political gamesmanship back into the conversation about children every time and with zero tolerance for anything less.

The responsibility is ours.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the October 29, 2014 edition of Education Week as Let’s Stop the Bickering And Change the Conversation

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Classroom Technology Webinar
Better Tools, Not More: What Educators Say About Teaching and Technology
Optimism is up. AI use is rising. Coherence is the next challenge. Hear what the 2026 Educator Confidence Report reveals about the field.
Content provided by HMH
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Achievement Webinar
The Relationship Advantage for Attendance, Engagement, and Achievement
Relationship-building goes beyond back-to-school. Get practical ideas from district leaders and educators to strengthen student connections.
School & District Management Webinar EdMarketer Quick Hit: Build Campaigns That Engage K-12 Leaders
We’ll share what’s resonating with Education Week’s K-12 audience based on user behavior across platforms and other proprietary data.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Federal Opinion Margaret Spellings and Arne Duncan: The Ed. Agenda We Can Agree On
We need to get education back on track, write the former Ed. Secretaries. Let’s start at the top.
Margaret Spellings & Arne Duncan
•
5 min read
Government research, State budgets, public education, back on track, Education Agenda
Vanessa Solis/Education Week + Getty
Federal Q&A A Top Democrat Breaks Down His Party's Plans for K-12 in a House Majority
If Democrats retake the House, Rep. Bobby Scott may be in a position to set his chamber’s K-12 agenda.
5 min read
Rep. Bobby Scott, D-Va., speaks during a prayer vigil held by the Chesapeake Coalition of Black Pastors at The Mount (Mount Lebanon Baptist Church) in Chesapeake, Va., Sunday, Nov. 27, 2022, for the six people killed at a Walmart in Chesapeake, Va., when a manager opened fire with a handgun before an employee meeting Tuesday night.
Rep. Bobby Scott, D-Va., speaks during a prayer vigil in Chesapeake, Va., on Nov. 27, 2022. Scott is the ranking Democrat on the U.S. House of Representatives' education committee and will seek the panel's chairmanship if Democrats win a House majority in next month's elections.
Carolyn Kaster/AP
Federal What a Democratic Congress Could Mean for Trump's K-12 Agenda
They may try to reverse—or at least investigate—the Trump admin.'s efforts to dismantle the Ed. Dept.
9 min read
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., the top Democrat in the Republican-majority House, is joined by Rep. Pete Aguilar, D-Calif., chair of the House Democratic Caucus, as they criticize President Donald Trump and his policies while talking to reporters about the approaching midterm election, at the Capitol in Washington, Thursday, Sept. 17, 2026.
House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries speaks at the U.S. Capitol on Sept. 17, 2026. He's joined by Rep. Pete Aguilar, D-Calif., who chairs the House Democratic Caucus. If Democrats gain a majority of either chamber of Congress after next month's elections, they'll be able to hold oversight hearings on and launch investigations into the dismantling of the U.S. Department of Education.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
Federal The Future of Education Research: More Partisan and Largely Left to States?
As Trump administration works to change federal grants, outside researchers try to regroup.
6 min read
Image of file folders with tabs called "funding" "grants" "projects" and a blank note paper paperclipped to the outside.
Collage by Laura Baker/Education Week + Getty