Law & Courts

Ohio Supreme Court Narrowly Upholds State Charter Law

October 30, 2006 2 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

In a 4-3 ruling handed down last week, the Ohio Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the state’s charter school law.

The law authorizing charter schools, called “community schools” in Ohio, was challenged by a coalition that was led by teachers’ unions and included school boards, parents, and others. With 305 charters serving some 72,000 students, Ohio has more of the independent but publicly funded schools than every state except Arizona, California, and Florida.

The plaintiffs sought a declaration that the state charter law and the method of financing charter schools violated the state constitution. But the court rejected those claims in Ohio Congress of Parents and Teachers v. State Board of Education, which was filed in 2001.

Charter students and their families “can rest more easily tonight, knowing that their schools won’t be shut down tomorrow,” said Stephen P. Carney, a state solicitor who represented Ohio in the case.

“The decision also, I think, reaffirms that education policy is best set by the legislature, not the courts,” added Chad A. Readler, a lawyer who represented charter schools that were defendants in the case.

Courts in several other states—including California, Michigan, New Jersey, and Utah—have rebuffed legal challenges to charters, Mr. Readler said.

The high court held oral arguments in the case in November of last year.

Tom Mooney, the president of the Ohio Federation of Teachers, one of the plaintiff organizations, criticized the ruling. “They seem to be almost abandoning the idea of a system of common schools,” he said.

Mr. Mooney said his union doesn’t oppose charter schools as such, but rather the design of Ohio’s law.

“We never argued that you can’t have charters, only that you’ve got to have them in a way that the public doesn’t lose control over its tax dollars and standards of education,” he said.

Charter advocates say the schools are subject to the same state standards as regular public schools, and if anything, face greater accountability. Still, advocates acknowledge serious shortcomings in the quality of many Ohio charters.

Three Dissents Issued

Writing for the majority in the Oct. 25 ruling, Justice Judith Ann Lanzinger rejected all the plaintiffs’ constitutional arguments.

“In enacting community school legislation, the General Assembly added to the traditional school system by providing for statewide schools that have more flexibility in their operation,” she wrote.

“Community schools were designed to give parents a choice and give educators ‘the opportunity to establish limited experimental educational programs in a deregulated setting,’ ” she added, quoting the state law, first passed in 1997 and later amended.

In one of three dissents, Justice Alice Robie Resnick argued that the charter law violates Ohio’s constitution “because it produces a hodgepodge of uncommon schools financed by the state.”

The law, she said, creates a “schismatic educational program under which an assemblage of divergent and deregulated privately owned and managed community schools competes against public schools for public funds.”

The court did not rule on certain nonconstitutional questions. For one, the plaintiffs claim that particular schools are operating in violation of state law. Teachers’ unions have been especially critical of having for-profit companies run some schools.

Mr. Mooney said no decisions had been made about continued legal action at the lower-court level. “This ruling makes it clear that we have to redouble our efforts to persuade the legislature to … overhaul this program,” he said.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the November 01, 2006 edition of Education Week as Ohio Supreme Court Narrowly Upholds State Charter Law

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Leadership in Education: Building Collaborative Teams and Driving Innovation
Learn strategies to build strong teams, foster innovation, & drive student success.
Content provided by Follett Learning
School & District Management K-12 Essentials Forum Principals, Lead Stronger in the New School Year
Join this free virtual event for a deep dive on the skills and motivation you need to put your best foot forward in the new year.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Privacy & Security Webinar
Navigating Modern Data Protection & Privacy in Education
Explore the modern landscape of data loss prevention in education and learn actionable strategies to protect sensitive data.
Content provided by  Symantec & Carahsoft

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Posting Ten Commandments in Schools Was Struck Down in 1980. Could That Change?
In 1980, the justices invalidated a Kentucky law, similar to the new Louisiana measure, requiring classroom displays of the Decalogue.
13 min read
Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry signs bills related to his education plan on June 19, 2024, at Our Lady of Fatima Catholic School in Lafayette, La. Louisiana has become the first state to require that the Ten Commandments be displayed in every public school classroom, the latest move from a GOP-dominated Legislature pushing a conservative agenda under a new governor.
Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry, a Republican, signs bills related to his education plan on June 19, 2024, at Our Lady of Fatima Catholic School in Lafayette, La. One of those new laws requires that the Ten Commandments be displayed in every public school classroom, but the law is similar to one from Kentucky that the U.S. Supreme Court struck down in 1980.
Brad Bowie/The Times-Picayune/The New Orleans Advocate via AP
Law & Courts Biden's Title IX Rule Is Now Blocked in 14 States
A judge in Kansas issued the third injunction against the Biden administration's rule granting protections to LGBTQ+ students.
4 min read
Kansas high school students, family members and advocates rally for transgender rights, Jan. 31, 2024, at the Statehouse in Topeka, Kan. On Tuesday, July 2, a federal judge in Kansas blocked a federal rule expanding anti-discrimination protections for LGBTQ+ students from being enforced in four states, including Kansas and a patchwork of places elsewhere across the nation.
Kansas high school students, family members and advocates rally for transgender rights, Jan. 31, 2024, at the Statehouse in Topeka, Kan. On Tuesday, July 2, a federal judge in Kansas blocked a federal rule expanding anti-discrimination protections for LGBTQ+ students from being enforced in four states, including Kansas, and a patchwork of places elsewhere across the nation.
John Hanna/AP
Law & Courts Student Says Snapchat Enabled Teacher's Abuse. Supreme Court Won't Hear His Case
The high court, over a dissent by two justices, decline to review the scope of Section 230 liability protection for social media platforms.
4 min read
The United States Supreme Court is seen in Washington, D.C., on July 1, 2024.
The U.S. Supreme Court is seen in Washington, D.C., on July 1, 2024. The high court declined on July 2 to take up a case about whether Snapchat could be held partially liable for a teacher's sexual abuse of a student.
Aashish Kiphayet/NurPhoto via AP
Law & Courts What the Supreme Court's Chevron Decision Could Mean for Biden's Title IX Rule
The decision overrules a 40-year-old precedent and could impact lawsuits challenging the final Title IX rule.
5 min read
Visitors pose for photographs at the U.S. Supreme Court on June 18, 2024, in Washington.
Visitors pose for photographs at the U.S. Supreme Court on June 18, 2024, in Washington. The high court on June 28 overruled a longtime precedent and held that courts, not federal agencies, have the primary authority to interpret ambiguous federal statutes.
Jose Luis Magana/AP