Education Funding

North Dakota House Passes Aid Overhaul

By Kathleen Kennedy Manzo — March 01, 2005 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The North Dakota House has approved a bill that would force sweeping changes to the state’s school finance structure and could potentially resolve a 2003 lawsuit by low-wealth districts challenging the school funding formula.

The measure, which passed the Republican-controlled House 49-41 last month, would nearly eliminate local school property taxes and raise the necessary $285 million for the general education fund through a higher sales tax and a surcharge on income taxes.

It is expected to face heated debate this month in the Senate, which is also controlled by the GOP.

Regardless, Gov. John Hoeven, a Republican, said last week that he would not sign any legislation raising sales or income taxes. “We need to hold the line on taxes,” Mr. Hoeven said last week on Prairie Public Television.

While the average tax burden for residents would remain relatively stable under the plan, it would mean significant changes in state funding for some districts.

State school aid would be distributed to districts based on their size, demographic makeup, and financial need. Currently, money is distributed on a per-pupil basis, with the state providing a little more than 40 percent of school funding.

Schools in Bismarck, for example, would receive an additional $1.5 million annually under the new structure, while the Fargo public schools would lose about $10 million, according to Rep. C.B. Haas, a former school administrator and a sponsor of the legislation.

The measure, however, would allow districts to levy local property taxes on a limited basis.

“The education of a child should not be contingent on the value of the property where the child lives,” Mr. Haas said in an interview last week. “The idea is to redistribute all of the money … in a true adequacy formula.”

State Contribution

Republican Reps. Haas and Gil Herbel, a longtime teacher in the Grafton public schools, introduced the bill. The 4,500-student Grafton district is a co-plaintiff in the 2003 lawsuit, which argues that the current property-tax-based formula prevents high-poverty schools from providing an adequate and equitable education for their students.

Mr. Haas was the business officer, and later superintendent, of the 2,600-student Dickinson district, which joined Grafton and several other school systems in challenging the finance structure in 1993. The state supreme court in that case agreed, 3-2, that the formula was flawed, but did not have the four votes necessary to declare the system unconstitutional. Another suit was filed in 2003 by some of the same defendants.

In response to that decision, the state legislature approved additional per-student funding for low-income districts, as well as more money for transportation and special education.

Mr. Haas, however, said that while the state has been tinkering with school funding for more than a decade, dramatic changes are necessary to make the system more equitable.

The state’s contribution to education is only about 41 percent, with the rest made up from local and federal funds, according to Mr. Haas, who also noted that the state’s share has gone down since 1993. His proposal would increase the state contribution to about 80 percent. “We certainly haven’t addressed this problem,” he said.

Uphill Battle

Some of the four plaintiffs in the current lawsuit have indicated they would drop out if the measure is enacted.

“If this bill passed the way it looks now, we would consider dropping our case,” said Steve Swiontek, the superintendent of the 1,850-student Devils Lake district, one of the plaintiffs in the 1993 and 2003 lawsuits. “It provides a lot more adequacy.”

The new formula would give Devils Lake an additional $2.5 million, bringing state funding for the district to $14.5 million.

Opponents of the bill, however, argued that it would significantly raise taxes on middle- and upper-income families and place more of the school finance burden on the state’s few urban areas.

The measure would place a 33 percent surcharge on income tax, which would mean an additional $330 for every $1,000 dollars on personal income tax bills. It also would raise the state sales tax by 2 cents, to 7.5 percent. Critics say the increase could discourage tourists from shopping in the state.

While Superintendent Swiontek acknowledged that the bill faces an uphill battle, he views it as a promising sign that change is possible.

“It’s really encouraged us this time,” Mr. Swiontek said, “that the legislature is finally willing to take a look at changing the antiquated and broken system that we have in North Dakota.”

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the March 02, 2005 edition of Education Week as North Dakota House Passes Aid Overhaul

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Mathematics Webinar
Engaging Every Learner: Strategies to Boost Math Motivation
Math Motivation Boost! Research & real tips to engage learners.
Content provided by Prodigy Education
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Well-Being Webinar
The Ripple Effect: Mental Health & Student Outcomes
Learn how student mental health impacts outcomes—and how to use that data to support your school’s IEP funding strategy.
Content provided by Huddle Up
Artificial Intelligence K-12 Essentials Forum How AI Use Is Expanding in K-12 Schools
Join this free virtual event to explore how AI technology is—and is not—improving K-12 teaching and learning.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Education Funding Billions for Schools Are in Limbo as Trump Admin. Denies State Funding Requests
Chaos and confusion continue to reign as states scramble to spend the last of their COVID relief funds under new deadlines.
8 min read
Illustration of a man pushing half of clock and half of a money coin forward on a red arrow
iStock/Getty Images Plus
Education Funding The Big Questions About Trump's K-12 Budget Proposal, Answered
Trump is proposing to cut billions of dollars in K-12 investments, consolidate grant programs, and potentially rejigger special education law.
13 min read
An aerial view of a maze made up of 100 dollar bills with two clay figures. One looks like Trump with blond hair and in a blue suit with a red tie and he's waving to another white business man in a suit walking away from him.
iStock/Getty
Education Funding Trump Asks Congress to Slash Billions in Education Funding—and 'Preserve' Title I
A White House budget proposal calls for consolidating grants, eliminating key funding streams, and ramping up charter school investments.
8 min read
Vector illustration of business persons tightening the purse/finances.
iStock/Getty
Education Funding Trump's Spending Plans Are Late—Raising Worries About K-12 Funds
The executive branch has three opportunities in the near future to detail its education funding priorities in writing—but it hasn't yet.
10 min read
Image of a dollar bill with the Capitol in the center.
DigitalVision Vectors