Law & Courts

N.Y. Court Strikes Down Kiryas Joel Schools Law

By Mark Walsh — May 14, 1997 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The establishment of a New York school district to serve children with disabilities in a village of Orthodox Jews was unanimously struck down last week by the state’s highest court.

It was the second time the New York Court of Appeals has rejected a law creating a Kiryas Joel village district. The first such ruling was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which found in 1994 that New York lawmakers had violated the U.S. Constitution’s prohibition against government establishment of religion by creating a school district for a religious sect. (“Court Strikes District for Hasidic Sect,” July 13, 1994.)

After the Supreme Court ruling, state legislators wrote a new law authorizing a district for the village of Kiryas Joel, a community of Satmar Hasidic Jews about 50 miles northwest of New York City. Most children in the village attend religious schools. The public school district was created to serve children with disabilities because Hasidic parents were reluctant to send such children to public schools in neighboring communities.

The legislature took its lead from a concurring opinion by Justice Sandra Day O’Connor suggesting that a general state law allowing certain villages to create their own school districts might pass muster under the Constitution.

‘Impermissible Endorsement’

However, the new law was challenged once again by officials of the New York State School Boards Association. They argued that provisions of the law are so detailed as to make Kiryas Joel the only municipality out of more than 1,500 in the state eligible to create its own school district.

In its May 6 ruling in Grumet v. Cuomo, the state high court agreed that the new law also violates the U.S. Constitution’s establishment clause. The law “effectively conveys a message of impermissible governmental endorsement of the Satmar community of Kiryas Joel,” the court said.

Steven Benardo, the superintendent of the Kiryas Joel district, said the school board was considering several options, including appealing the ruling to the Supreme Court again.

“The republic hasn’t fallen as a result of the Kiryas Joel school district,” he said. “No one says we are doing anything inappropriate. So it is difficult to understand why some people are analyzing us in such microscopic detail.”

Related Tags:

Events

Jobs Regional K-12 Virtual Career Fair: DMV
Find teaching jobs and K-12 education jubs at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
College & Workforce Readiness Webinar
Blueprints for the Future: Engineering Classrooms That Prepare Students for Careers
Explore how to build career-ready engineering programs in your high school with hands-on, real-world learning strategies.
Content provided by Project Lead The Way
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School Climate & Safety Webinar
Cardiac Emergency Response Plans: What Schools Need Now
Sudden cardiac arrest can happen at school. Learn why CERPs matter, what’srequired, and how districts can prepare to save lives.
Content provided by American Heart Association

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Opinion Why the Supreme Court’s Ruling on Conversion Therapy Matters for Schools
A recent case puts religiously motivated speech ahead of the well-being of LGBTQ+ youth.
Jonathon E. Sawyer
5 min read
lgbtq student backpack with rainbow spectrum flag on stairs isolated
Education Week + iStock/Getty
Law & Courts Minn. Districts Ask Judge to Restore Immigration Enforcement Limits by Schools
Two districts say the policy change hurt attendance and cost them students.
3 min read
Fridley Superintendent Brenda Lewis speaks during a news conference in February at the Minnesota State Capitol.
Superintendent Brenda Lewis of the Fridley, Minn., school district speaks during a news conference in February 2026 at the Minnesota State Capitol. The Fridley district is one of two Minnesota school districts suing the U.S. Department of Homeland Security in an effort to restore restrictions on immigration enforcement in and near schools.
Carlos Gonzalez/Minnesota Star Tribune via TNS
Law & Courts Birthright Citizenship Case Raises Stakes for Schools and Undocumented Students
Educators are paying close attention to the case on Trump's birthright citizenship order.
10 min read
President Donald Trump signs an executive order on birthright citizenship in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, Jan. 20, 2025.
President Donald Trump signs an executive order on birthright citizenship in the Oval Office of the White House on Jan. 20, 2025. The order, now before the U.S. Supreme Court, seeks to limit citizenship for some children born in the United States to immigrant parents without permanent legal status.
Evan Vucci/AP
Law & Courts Appeals Court Revives Lawsuit Over 1st Grader’s Black Lives Matter Drawing
A court revived a 1st grader 's claim she was punished for giving a drawing to a Black classmate.
4 min read
Seen is the drawing made by Viejo Elementary School first-grader B.B. that was entered into evidence. B.B. gave the drawing to her classmate, M.C., who is African American. M.C. thanked B.B.
Pictured is a drawing by a 1st grader in California and given to a Black classmate that is at the center of a First Amendment legal challenge over the student's alleged punishment.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit