Law & Courts

Dallas School Roiled by Segregation Ruling

By Mary Ann Zehr — December 05, 2006 3 min read

A civil rights group criticized Dallas school officials last week because they haven’t removed an elementary school principal who was found by a federal judge to be illegally segregating African-American and Latino children from their non-Hispanic white peers.

The Mexican-American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, a Latino advocacy group, had sued on behalf of Lucresia Mayorga Santamaria, saying that two of the Dallas mother’s children were discriminated against because they were assigned to English-as-a-second-language classes at Preston Hollow Elementary School based on their ethnicity, not their language ability.

Read the court ruling, posted by the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund.

In a 107-page ruling issued Nov. 16, U.S. District Judge Sam A. Lindsay ruled that Teresa Parker, the principal of Preston Hollow, was personally liable for violating the children’s rights under the equal-protection clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. He ordered the principal to pay Ms. Santamaria $20,200 in damages.

Judge Lindsay gave the 161,000-student Dallas school district until Jan. 17 to eliminate segregation at the school. The judge stopped short of finding the district or higher-level administrators liable for the situation at Preston Hollow, but he wrote that district officials were “asleep at the wheel.”

“I was pretty shocked that the district didn’t come out immediately and state they were going to terminate [the principal] or relieve her of her duties,” David G. Hinojosa, MALDEF’s lead lawyer in the case, said in an interview last week. “For a district that serves a substantial number of minority children, what message are they sending to those children and families by keeping this principal?”

But Kaky Wakefield, the vice president of the parent-teacher association at the school, said that except for the two parents who complained, she believes Preston Hollow parents want Ms. Parker to stay.

“Teresa Parker is there for every child at that school,” she said. “To paint her as a racist and segregationist is truly offensive.”

Clyde A. Henderson, a spokesman for the Dallas district, acknowledged last week that Ms. Parker was still in her position, and he said that the situation was being investigated.

He declined to comment on the court ruling, except to say that the district was looking at schools to make sure illegal segregation isn’t occurring, and was “making sure schools know what they are supposed to do.”

Ms. Parker didn’t return phone calls left at Preston Hollow Elementary last week seeking comment.

‘Separate But Equal’?

Judge Lindsay said in his opinion that Ms. Parker “was, in effect, operating, at taxpayer’s expense, a private school for Anglo children within a public school that was predominantly minority.”

The plaintiffs argued that African-American and Latino children who were fluent in English were assigned to classes designated as ESL, while non-Hispanic whites generally were not.

The judge held a trial in August, with three teachers and an assistant principal testifying on behalf of the plaintiffs. No teacher testified on behalf of Ms. Parker or the other defendants.

The judge quoted a Preston Hollow teacher as testifying that Anglo children had been assigned to classes that were primarily Anglo because “the people who live in the Preston Hollow neighborhood, who are the majority being white, would want their children grouped together.”

The judge said he was “baffled that in this day and age, defendants are relying on what is, essentially, a ‘separate but equal’ argument.”

Preston Hollow’s 445 students are about 18 percent non-Hispanic white, 66 percent Latino, 14 percent African-American, and 2 percent Asian, according to the ruling.

Ms. Wakefield and Joe Bittner, another parent at the school, said Ms. Parker never gave them any indication she had grouped white children in classrooms and, in fact, they chose the school because of its diversity. Ms. Wakefield’s twin 4th-grade boys are in classrooms that are about one third non-Hispanic white and two-thirds minority, she said.

According to court papers, the principal testified that children in English-as-a-second-language classes at Preston Hollow receive a general education regardless of whether they are English-language learners or not, and they receive the same curriculum as regular students. She told the court she had never assigned a student to a particular classroom based on race or national origin.

Judge Lindsay said in his opinion that Ms. Parker’s testimony “at times lacked credibility, was evasive and confusing.”

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the December 06, 2006 edition of Education Week as Dallas School Roiled by Segregation Ruling


School & District Management Webinar What's Ahead for Hybrid Learning: Putting Best Practices in Motion
It’s safe to say hybrid learning—a mix of in-person and remote instruction that evolved quickly during the pandemic—is probably here to stay in K-12 education to some extent. That is the case even though increasing
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Mathematics Webinar
Building Equitable Systems: Moving Math From Gatekeeper to Opportunity Gateway
The importance of disrupting traditional American math practices and adopting high-quality math curriculum continues to be essential for changing the trajectory of historically under-resourced schools. Building systems around high-quality math curriculum also is necessary to
Content provided by Partnership for L.A. Schools
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Student Well-Being Webinar
Measuring & Supporting Student Well-Being: A Researcher and District Leader Roundtable
Students’ social-emotional well-being matters. The positive and negative emotions students feel are essential characteristics of their psychology, indicators of their well-being, and mediators of their success in school and life. Supportive relationships with peers, school
Content provided by Panorama Education

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts How a Cheerleader's Snapchat Profanity Could Shape the Limits of Students' Free Speech
Brandi Levy's social media post is the basis for a case before the U.S. Supreme Court on whether schools may punish off-campus speech.
9 min read
Image of Brandi Levy.
Brandi Levy, now an 18-year-old college freshman, was a cheerleader at Mahanoy Area High School in Pennsylvania when she made profane comments on Snapchat that are now at the center of a U.S. Supreme Court case on student speech rights.
Danna Singer/Provided by the American Civil Liberties Union
Law & Courts Student School Board Members Flex Their Civic Muscle in Supreme Court Free-Speech Case
Current and former student school board members add their growing voices to a potentially precedent-setting U.S. Supreme Court case.
7 min read
Image of the Supreme Court.
Law & Courts Justice Department Memo Could Stoke State-Federal Fights Over Transgender Students' Rights
Title IX prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity in schools, a Justice Department memo says.
3 min read
Stephanie Marty demonstrates against a proposed ban on transgender girls and women from female sports leagues outside the South Dakota governor's mansion in Pierre, S.D. on March 11, 2021.
Stephanie Marty demonstrates against a proposed ban on allowing transgender girls and women to play in female sports leagues outside the South Dakota governor's mansion in Pierre, S.D.
Stephen Groves/AP
Law & Courts Diverse Array of Groups Back Student in Supreme Court Case on Off-Campus Speech
John and Mary Beth Tinker, central to the landmark speech case that bears their name, argue that even offensive speech merits protection.
5 min read
In this photo taken Tuesday, Aug. 27, 2013, Mary Beth Tinker, 61, shows an old photograph of her with her brother John Tinker to the Associated Press during an interview in Washington. Tinker was just 13 when she spoke out against the Vietnam War by wearing a black armband to her Iowa school in 1965. When the school suspended her, she took her free speech case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court and won. Her message: Students should take action on issues important to them. "It's better for our whole society when kids have a voice," she says.
In this 2013 photo, Mary Beth Tinker shows a 1968 Associated Press photograph of her with her brother John Tinker displaying the armbands they had worn in school to protest the Vietnam War. (The peace symbols were added after the school protest). The Tinkers have filed a brief in the U.S. Supreme Court supporting a Pennsylvania student who was disciplined for an offensive message on Snapchat.
Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP