Federal

Capitol Recap

June 06, 2001 8 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The following offers education-related highlights of the recent legislative sessions. The enrollment figures are based on estimated fall 2000 data reported by the National Center for Education Statistics for prekindergarten through 12th grade in public elementary and secondary schools. The figures for precollegiate education spending include money for state education administration, but not federal, flow-through dollars, unless otherwise noted.

Indiana | Iowa | Kansas

INDIANA

Leaner Times Leave Mark on K-12 Spending Plan

In its budget for the upcoming biennium, Indiana increased the general operating aid it gives school districts and also made available a small amount of funding for the first time for districts to run all-day-kindergarten programs.

Given the economic slowdown in the state, officials in the department of education are feeling grateful about even modest increases in money for schools, according to Terry Spradlin, the legislative liaison for the department.

“All things considered, it’s a good budget for K-12 education,” Mr. Spradlin said. “By funding an all-day kindergarten and some other new things, we’ve got our foot in the door, and two years from now, if we have an upturn of the economy, we’ll be able to get more funding.”

Gov. Frank L. O'Bannon

Democrat
Senate:
18 Democrats
32 Republicans
House:
53 Democrats
47 Republicans
Enrollment:
989,000

The state has allocated $3.41 billion for general operating aid to school districts in the 2001-02 fiscal year, a 3.5 percent increase over what it gave districts during the current fiscal year. And the general operating-aid allocation for fiscal 2002-03 contains an additional 3.5 percent increase over fiscal 2001-02. The full state K-12 budget for fiscal 2001-02 is $3.75 billion and will increase to $3.89 billion in fiscal 2002-03.

The budget contains $10 million for each year of the biennium for all-day kindergarten programs.

In another move that pleased the department of education, the legislature agreed on a new cutoff date of July 1 for when kindergartners must turn 5 to enroll in school the following fall. While many states use a cutoff date of Sept. 1, Indiana has required children to have turned 5 by June 1 to enter kindergarten the following fall. The change will permit more children to enter school at a younger age, which advocates of the move say is particularly beneficial to children who have little access to informal education before they enter school.

State education officials had hoped to get more money for summer schools, alternative education programs, adult education, and programs for students with limited English skills, but the legislature left the levels of funding for those areas unchanged.

Many of Gov. Frank L. O’Bannon’s proposals for new education funding were either greatly modified or rejected by the legislature. For example, the governor had proposed that the state provide $50 million over the biennium for school-readiness programs, including full-day kindergarten. But the final budget contained only $20 million for full-day kindergarten.

Also, the governor had requested that the state spend $30 million over the biennium on a teacher-training program that was authorized as part of school accountability legislation passed in 1999. The legislature approved $16.25 million for the program, though, which will be spent during the second year of the biennium.

But Mr. O’Bannon was pleased that the legislature passed a law this spring that will permit charter schools in Indiana, something he had promoted for seven years. (“Indiana Legislature Passes Charter School Law,” April 25, 2001.)

—Mary Ann Zehr


IOWA

Teacher-Salary Package Cuts a New Policy Path

Passage of a groundbreaking teacher-compensation package and declining state revenues dominated this year’s legislative session in Iowa.

The state scrapped its traditional teacher-salary schedule, which was based on seniority, and replaced it with a plan that will pay educators based on their work performance and their students’ achievement. (“Iowa Approves Performance Pay for Its Teachers,” May 16, 2001.)

Although opposed by the Iowa State Education Association and many Democrats, Gov. Tom Vilsack signed the plan into law last month, along with the state’s $2 billion K-12 education budget for the coming fiscal year.

The teacher-pay plan, which is expected to cost the state $40 million in the first year, establishes standards for teachers, creates a new evaluation system, and provides cash rewards for staff members at schools in which students show improvement on tests. The minimum annual salary for beginning teachers will climb from $23,000 to $28,000.

Gov. Tom Vilsack

Democrat
Senate:
20 Democrats
30 Republicans
House:
44 Democrats
56 Republicans
Enrollment:
497,000

Most critics of the plan believe it relies too heavily on nonrenewable funding sources and local money. The compensation package is being financed with money from Iowa’s share of the multistate settlement with the nation’s tobacco companies.

The debate over the teacher-quality legislation had its especially contentious moments, acknowledged Ann McCarthy, the legislative liaison for the Iowa Department of Education. Yet, she added: “The positive thing is we had the Iowa legislature very engaged in teacher quality.”

For the 2001-02 fiscal year, every state agency was forced to contend with an average 6 percent budget cut to make up for a $300 million decrease in state revenues. Nevertheless, the legislature lived up to its pledge to increase the per-pupil allocation for schools’ day-to-day operations by 4 percent, or about $59 million, in fiscal 2001.

Still, there were significant cuts in higher education and the department of education, totaling $60 million, with community colleges and universities suffering the lion’s share of the budget reductions. And the education department’s general administration budget will be reduced by 6 percent, or $363,000.

The legislature also supported an additional $32 million in budget reductions to standing appropriations for education. School technology will suffer the deepest cut, with funding dropping by $20 million, bringing it to $10 million for fiscal 2002.

Mary Gannon, the director of policy services for the Iowa Association of School Boards, said school districts with long-term technology contracts would be forced to make tough budget decisions, shifting general-fund dollars to make up the shortfall.

But the governor used his line-item-veto authority to soften the budget blow by restoring money for a variety of other education programs earmarked by the legislature for cuts or no increase.

Gov. Vilsack restored the promised $10 million increase for class-size reductions and early-literacy programs. Funding for both multiyear programs, which began in the 2000 fiscal year, is up to $30 million, from $20 million this year. A minimum of $30 million has been promised for fiscal 2003. School districts statewide had put hiring on hold and considered laying off employees in anticipation of no increases for class-size- reduction and early literacy.

To support the teacher-quality package, Mr. Vilsack restored a proposed $2 million decrease in funding for teacher professional development, which brings that budget up to $23 million.

The governor also restored $550,000 set aside to reimburse families for providing transportation for their children who attend private schools.

Meanwhile, legislation to authorize charter schools made significant headway before falling by the wayside. The Senate passed the bill, which would have established pilot charter schools and districts, by a vote of 33-16. In the House, however, it never reached a vote.

—Karla Scoon Reid


KANSAS

Finance Changes Debated, But Ultimately Dropped

Lawmakers vigorously debated revamping Kansas’ system of school finance this legislative session.

But in the end, they chose to leave the current plan intact, while providing cost-of-living increases for employees in the state’s 304 K-12 school districts and expanding programs for children considered at risk for academic failure.

Ultimately, the package passed mirrored a proposal articulated by Gov. Bill Graves in his State of the State Address in January. The legislation provides $67 million in new funding for precollegiate education in fiscal 2002, for a total of $2.4 billion. The state’s overall fiscal 2002 budget is $4.5 billion.

Gov. Bill Graves

Republican
Senate:
10 Democrats
30 Republicans
House:
47 Democrats
78 Republicans
Enrollment:
470,000

The plan increases per-pupil spending by $50, to $3,870; allocates $7.5 million more to expand two established programs for preschool and elementary school students deemed at risk; and provides $8 million more to fund the state’s share of special education expenses.

State officials, however, say that the latter increase will be nearly negated by special education costs that are rising at a sometimes staggering rate.

While lawmakers touted their ability to hold taxes at the current level, critics contend that the package provides far too little for schools to run properly.

“This a woefully inadequate increase,” said Mark Tallman, a lobbyist for the Kansas Association of School Boards, which represents 294 school districts.

Budget increases total less than half the rate of inflation, and as a consequence, local school districts will have to raise taxes, Mr. Tallman said. Meanwhile, localities will have to find a way to finance raises for teachers, an important consideration in attracting and retaining educators, he said.

Members of the House and the Senate, eyeing revenue projections that fell short of estimates, soundly rejected legislation that would have changed the way the state pays for its public schools.

If enacted, the measures would have introduced new taxes or would have raised those already in place.

The legislature aimed to strike a balance, however, and shot down a bill that would have lowered the taxes earmarked for schools.

In the end, the lawmakers appropriated $220,000 to study the need to overhaul the school finance system. The report is due out in January.

—Julie Blair

A version of this article appeared in the June 06, 2001 edition of Education Week as Capitol Recap

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Harnessing AI to Address Chronic Absenteeism in Schools
Learn how AI can help your district improve student attendance and boost academic outcomes.
Content provided by Panorama Education
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Science Webinar
Spark Minds, Reignite Students & Teachers: STEM’s Role in Supporting Presence and Engagement
Is your district struggling with chronic absenteeism? Discover how STEM can reignite students' and teachers' passion for learning.
Content provided by Project Lead The Way
Recruitment & Retention Webinar EdRecruiter 2025 Survey Results: The Outlook for Recruitment and Retention
See exclusive findings from EdWeek’s nationwide survey of K-12 job seekers and district HR professionals on recruitment, retention, and job satisfaction. 

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Federal How Trump Can Hobble the Education Department Without Abolishing It
There is plenty the incoming administration can do to kneecap the main federal agency responsible for K-12 schools.
9 min read
Former President Donald Trump speaks as he arrives in New York on April 15, 2024.
President-elect Donald Trump speaks as he arrives in New York on April 15, 2024. Trump pledged on the campaign trail to eliminate the U.S. Department of Education in his second term.
Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via AP
Federal Opinion Closing the Education Department Is a Solution in Search of a Problem
There’s a bill in Congress seeking to eliminate the U.S. Department of Education. What do its supporters really want?
Jonas Zuckerman
4 min read
USA government confusion and United States politics problem and American federal legislation trouble as a national political symbol with 3D illustration elements.
iStock/Getty Images
Federal Opinion 'Education Is Not Entertainment': What This Educator Wants Linda McMahon to Know
Her experience leading a pro wrestling organization could be both an asset and a liability
Robert Barnett
4 min read
A group of students reacting to a spectacle inside a ring.
Vanessa Solis/Education Week + Getty Images
Federal Opinion No, the U.S. Ed. Dept. Won't Be Abolished. But Here's What’s Likely to Happen Instead
There are plenty of big changes ahead that could catch educators, advocates, and others by surprise.
5 min read
The United States Capitol building as a bookcase filled with red, white, and blue policy books in a Washington DC landscape.
Luca D'Urbino for Education Week