Professional Development

Reading-Achievement Program Is Off to a Quiet Start

By Kathleen Kennedy Manzo — January 13, 1999 5 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Just as its passage slipped quietly through the federal appropriations process last fall, implementation of the Reading Excellence Act, a plan to raise American schoolchildren’s lackluster reading achievement, is proceeding without fanfare.

The program’s staff at the Department of Education, appointed a few weeks ago, is working behind the scenes to ready applications, draft procedures, and inform states about how to tap $520 million in block grants over the next two years.

Most of the money is intended to have a direct effect on the classrooms that need it most, with 85 percent targeted to professional development for teachers and to assistance programs for disadvantaged children who may be at risk of failure in reading. States will be required to distribute the grants to their poorest districts and to those that state education officials identify as most in need of improving student achievement. What’s left will go to family-literacy and tutoring programs.

The program is expected to reach 500,000 children.

“I think [the Reading Excellence Program] has the potential to have a substantial impact on the children most at risk of reading failure,” Joseph Conaty, who was appointed the program’s director last month, said in an interview last week. Mr. Conaty previously worked for the department’s office of educational research and improvement, most recently as the director of the Student Achievement Institute. “If well done, the program can provide teachers with the knowledge and information they need to help these children learn to read by the 3rd grade,” he said.

Research-Based Programs

The Reading Excellence Act has won praise for putting improved reading instruction at the forefront of education reform.

“We have an enormous problem in achievement disparity in poor districts,” said Marilyn J. Adams, a professor of education at Harvard University and a prominent reading researcher. “I am very pleased that the government has the initiative in addressing it.”

Ms. Adams said the new law, because of its emphasis on professional development, will ensure that teachers understand the latest research findings on how children learn to read and how to help those struggling with reading.

But some experts are wary of the potential for bias to creep into the grant-review process. The legislation outlines a definition of reading that can be agreed on by many advocates of both phonics- and literature-based approaches to reading instruction. The requirement that programs receiving the awards follow “scientifically based reading research,” however, concerns some researchers who believe that the phrase has become code for instruction steeped in phonics. That method teaches children to break words into letters and sounds before putting them into the context of sentences and stories.

“Because of the way the language [in the legislation] is worded, it has the potential to be exclusive and ideological,” argued P. David Pearson, a professor of education at Michigan State University in East Lansing and a co-director of the Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement.

A panel composed of representatives of several federal agencies--including the Education Department, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and the National Institute for Literacy--as well as the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences will decide which applications best meet the goals of the legislation.

The law requires that programs receiving aid use a balance of strategies, including both systematic phonics and rich literature, to develop phonemic awareness (the understanding of the letters and sounds that make up words), fluency, and reading comprehension.

The composition of the panel will determine whether applications are reviewed objectively, said Alan E. Farstrup, the executive director of the Newark, Del.-based International Reading Association. “We try to make sure that these important policies are not held hostage to other political agendas.”

But Catherine Snow, a professor of education at Harvard University who was instrumental in preparing an NRC report on reading last year, said that many experts now agree on what makes a good reading program.

“There is a fair degree of consensus across the field concerning methods and approaches to teaching children to read,” she said. “Now, we can focus on putting what we know into practice and stop having the fights that detract from a focus on the kids and what they need.”

Under the legislation, the National Institute for Literacy, an independent federal agency charged with helping to coordinate federal, state, and local literacy efforts, will be the main source for information on effective reading programs. Though the institute’s primary focus is on adult learners, its experience in family literacy and reading research can be effectively applied to the K-12 arena, Mr. Conaty said.

The states receiving the grants must establish “reading and literacy partnerships” made up of state government and education representatives and members of community groups.

Teacher Training Crucial

The reading initiative grew out of President Clinton’s proposal, unveiled during his 1996 re-election campaign, to build a citizen army of a million volunteer tutors to help children learn to read.

The $2.7 billion plan was widely criticized for its lack of focus on the classroom and on teacher qualifications, and for implying that volunteers with minimal training and supervision could cure the nation’s reading woes.

The Reading Excellence Act, the Republican response to Mr. Clinton’s initiative, focused instead on improving teachers’ knowledge of the reading process and their skill in bringing struggling young readers up to grade level.

Rep. Bill Goodling, R-Pa., the House Education and the Workforce Committee chairman who was the chief sponsor of the measure, “is thrilled that it is law,” according to Jay Diskey, a spokesman for the committee’s Republicans.

“From the start of the debate, Mr. Goodling said that training is the most important element. This will do a lot more for teachers and children than America Reads,” Mr. Diskey said.

But Mr. Clinton’s plan for reading tutors did not disappear. Aside from the 15 percent set aside in the Reading Excellence Act for tutors, a drastically scaled-down version of the America Reads program has flourished with thousands of participants from the federal work-study and AmeriCorps programs tutoring children in reading. (“‘America Reads’ Is Taking Hold at Grassroots,” May 6, 1998.)

A version of this article appeared in the January 13, 1999 edition of Education Week as Reading-Achievement Program Is Off to a Quiet Start


Budget & Finance Webinar Leverage New Funding Sources with Data-Informed Practices
Address the whole child using data-informed practices, gain valuable insights, and learn strategies that can benefit your district.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Classroom Technology Webinar
ChatGPT & Education: 8 Ways AI Improves Student Outcomes
Revolutionize student success! Don't miss our expert-led webinar demonstrating practical ways AI tools will elevate learning experiences.
Content provided by Inzata
Classroom Technology K-12 Essentials Forum Tech Is Everywhere. But Is It Making Schools Better?
Join us for a lively discussion about the ways that technology is being used to improve schools and how it is falling short.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Professional Development A Year of PD: One District's Strategy for Training Teachers on Climate Change
Teachers in the Bloomingdale, Ill., district get a salary premium for attending a yearlong PD program on climate change.
9 min read
Kelly Ashline, the faciliator of Roy DeShane Elementary School’s Environmental Club, talks to students during their weekly nature walk on May 12, 2023, in Carol Stream, Ill.
Kelly Ashline, the Roy DeShane Elementary School’s Environmental Club facilitator, leads students on a weekly nature walk on May 12, 2023, in Carol Stream, Ill. Encouraging students' interest in the natural environment is one element of the climate change training teachers in the district receive.
Jamie Kelter Davis for Education Week
Professional Development Opinion How to Engage Educators When Leading Professional Development
The further removed a leader is from the classroom, the harder it is to turn training into practice. One PD facilitator has advice.
Michael Nelson
5 min read
Screen Shot 2023 05 07 at 7.03.55 AM
Professional Development Teachers Need PD on Artificial Intelligence. What It Should Look Like
Schools are just beginning to think about how to integrate AI into teacher professional development.
6 min read
Photo collage of teacher working at desk with laptop computer.
F. Sheehan for Education Week / Getty
Professional Development Q&A Can AI Do Teacher Observations and Deliver PD? In Some Schools, It Already Does
A school district in Washington state is trying out an artificial-intelligence-powered instructional coach.
4 min read
Photo collage of tablet computer and teacher instructing class.
F. Sheehan for Education Week / Getty