Opinion
Equity & Diversity Opinion

‘All the Black Kids at Harvard Are Rich,’ and Other Dangerous Myths About Affirmative Action

Why colleges should consider both race and class in admissions
By Julie J. Park — February 26, 2019 | Corrected: February 28, 2019 4 min read
BRIC ARCHIVE
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Corrected: A previous version of this piece misspelled Alexandria Radford’s name.

High school seniors will soon be showing up in droves for tours of college campuses, kicking off a new round of the higher-ed admissions scramble. Given the media coverage of the Harvard and University of North Carolina affirmative-action trials, guidance counselors may get questions about affirmative action policies from students and their families.

One common question is why campuses continue paying special attention to race and ethnicity in admissions: Can’t they just focus on socioeconomic disadvantage? After all, low-income students are greatly underrepresented at elite schools. Just considering class instead of race sounds like an easy solution to achieving diversity.

Socioeconomic diversity doesn't come from eliminating consideration of race, it comes from recognizing it."

Well, what do the data say? As a researcher who has extensively studied race and college admissions, I know that class-based affirmative action isn’t enough, and it’s not just an issue of racial diversity. Race matters for boosting economic diversity in higher education. Studies indicate that campuses are more socioeconomically diverse when colleges consider both race and class together, not just class alone.

Recent research suggests that the best way to expand low-income students’ opportunities to study at top colleges is not to ban race but to look at it alongside class. In a groundbreaking study by Stanford University professor Sean Reardon and colleagues, the researchers’ statistical simulations demonstrated that colleges get the most socioeconomic diversity when they strongly consider both race and class in the admissions process. Perhaps counter intuitively, socioeconomic diversity doesn’t come from eliminating consideration of race, it comes from recognizing it.

Why would greater class diversity stem from recognizing both race and class? One word: intersectionality. The term was coined by a legal scholar, but has proved widely useful. Basically, it refers to the cumulative effects of discrimination or inequality from the ways in which racism, classism, or gender discrimination intersect. Ignore one trait that leads to inequality (e.g., race), and you are ill-equipped to tackle the problem of inequality broadly considered. Examine where the categories intersect, and you have a fuller view of the issue.

In the United States, economic inequality isn’t race-neutral; it works in conjunction with race. According to the Urban Institute, in 2016, the average white family’s wealth was seven times greater than the average black family’s and five times greater than that of the average Latino family’s. The racial wealth gap is real and persistent. An admissions system that considers only class without addressing race will fall short of fostering diversity, both racial and socioeconomic.

Don’t believe the myth that all of the black kids at Harvard are rich. According to William Bowen and Derek Bok’s now-classic defense of affirmative action at elite colleges, The Shape of the River, black students were seven times more likely to come from poor families than white students. Also, as you might guess, a much higher percentage of white students than black students fell into the top socioeconomic category (44 percent for whites, 15 percent for blacks).

A related misconception is that current policies give no weight to social class. Sociologists Thomas Espenshade and Alexandria Radford found that class seemed to be an important factor in admissions at the 10 selective colleges they studied. “Private schools consistently [favor] candidates from lower- and working-class backgrounds over those from more privileged circumstances,” they reported in their 2009 book No Longer Separate, Not Yet Equal.

The evidence strongly suggests, they wrote, that “admission officers are awarding extra weight to nonwhite students from poor and working-class families—especially to those who are the closest to the bottom of the income distribution.” Considering both race and class allows colleges to pay special attention to low-income students of color.

And relevant to the lawsuit charging that Harvard discriminates against Asian-American applicants, Espenshade and Radford noted that low-income and working-class Asian-Americans were among those who were specially favored in the admissions process. Given my support of race-conscious admissions and as an Asian-American, I sometimes get asked, “Don’t you care about poor Asian-American kids?” To which I answer, “Absolutely. And there’s a good chance that they’d suffer under policies that don’t consider race.”

Espenshade and Radford’s research undermines the claim that race-conscious admissions is actually detrimental to low-income students. Is it perfect? No. Could we have even more low-income students of all races? Absolutely. But to say that the current system ignores social class is blatantly wrong.

Admissions need work, and colleges need more low-income students of all races. Colleges should do more proactive outreach to a wider variety of high schools and not just the typical feeder schools. But boosting socioeconomic diversity is not going to come from banning race-conscious admissions. We have to look at both race and class, and eliminating consideration of race will only threaten our ability to close opportunity gaps for low-income students.

Follow the Education Week Commentary section on Twitter.

Sign up to get the latest Education Week Commentaries in your email inbox.
A version of this article appeared in the February 27, 2019 edition of Education Week as Why Class-Based Affirmative Action Isn’t Enough

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
IT Infrastructure Webinar
A New Era In Connected Learning: Security, Accessibility and Affordability for a Future-Ready Classroom
Learn about Windows 11 SE and Surface Laptop SE. Enable students to unlock learning and develop new skills.
Content provided by Microsoft Surface
Classroom Technology K-12 Essentials Forum Making Technology Work Better in Schools
Join experts for a look at the steps schools are taking (or should take) to improve the use of technology in schools.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Budget & Finance Webinar
The ABCs of ESSER: How to Make the Most of Relief Funds Before They Expire
Join a diverse group of K-12 experts to learn how to leverage federal funds before they expire and improve student learning environments.
Content provided by Johnson Controls

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Equity & Diversity Opinion The ‘Great Replacement Theory’ Is a Lie. It's Also a Threat to Schools
The conspiracy espoused by the Buffalo shooting suspect is of particular concern for schools, writes Jonathan E. Collins.
Jonathan E. Collins
3 min read
Signs, balloons, and police tape are wrapped around a pole across from Tops Friendly Market, the Buffalo, N.Y., grocery store that was the site of a racist shooting rampage.
Signs, balloons, and police tape are wrapped around a pole across from Tops Friendly Market, the Buffalo, N.Y., grocery store that was the site of a racist shooting rampage on May 14.
Joshua Bessex/AP
Equity & Diversity A School Openly Discusses Race in a State That Bans It
At Millwood High School, discussions on race are everywhere, and students say the lessons are essential.
7 min read
Students pass through the halls in between classes at Millwood High School on April 20, 2022 in Oklahoma City.
Students change classes at Millwood High School this spring in Oklahoma City.
Brett Deering for Education Week
Equity & Diversity Opinion The Buffalo Massacre Is Exactly Why We Need to Talk About Racism With White Students
Too many white people are receiving their information about race from racist media rather than their schools, writes David Nurenberg.
David Nurenberg
4 min read
On May 15, people march to the scene of a mass shooting at a supermarket in Buffalo, N.Y.
On May 15, people march to the scene of a mass shooting at a supermarket in Buffalo, N.Y.
Matt Rourke/AP
Equity & Diversity Native American Children Endured Brutal Treatment in U.S. Boarding Schools, Federal Report Shows
Deaths, physical and psychological punishments, and manual labor occurred at the more than 400 federal boarding schools.
5 min read
Interior Secretary Deb Haaland speaks at the Cherokee Immersion School on Dec. 3, 2021, in Tahlequah, Okla. The Interior Department is on the verge of releasing a report on its investigation into the federal government's past oversight of Native American boarding schools. Interior Secretary Deb Haaland said Wednesday, March 16, 2022, the report will come out next month.
U.S. Secretary of the Interior Deb Haaland speaks at the Cherokee Immersion School in December, in Tahlequah, Okla. Her agency's report documents harmful conditions, deaths, and physical punishment for Native American students forced to attend federal boarding schools.
Michael Woods/AP