Equity & Diversity

Chicago Schools Dispute Desegregation Study

By Mary Ann Zehr — October 22, 2003 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The Chicago school district took the unusual step this month of releasing a consultant’s report on desegregation in the city’s schools, while also putting out its own memorandum rebutting some of the findings.

The report is one of four commissioned by the Chicago board of education to study whether the system has met the goals of a 22-year-old desegregation decree ordered by a federal court. G. Alfred Hess Jr., the director of the Center for Urban School Policy at Northwestern University, researched and wrote the report.

While the school system released the other three reports in March, it held on to the one by Mr. Hess, which was completed in May 2002 and then supplemented with an addendum in September of last year. The district released the report on Oct. 9 at the request of local news organizations.

Joi M. Mecks, the deputy communications director for the 439,000-student system, said the district didn’t make the report public initially because Mr. Hess had failed to complete some of the work that had been requested of him.

The main point of contention is whether Chicago’s most racially segregated elementary schools receive more money than other kinds of elementary schools, such as magnet schools. The desegregation plan said that the schools in which students were most segregated by race should receive extra money to compensate for that fact.

Mr. Hess is unhappy about how the matter was handled by the district. He said last week: “There was a continuing mystery about some of these monies. ... They prepared this memo [of rebuttal] even while I was working with someone from their budget office and their lawyer to try to solve these problems, and then they made it sound like I didn’t do my work.”

Disputed Point

Mr. Hess found that as recently as 1995, the more segregated elementary schools—those with at least 85 percent minority students—did get compensatory money. But in more recent years, they lost that funding edge. Segregated high schools, however, still had a funding advantage.

“Does the school system really want to provide extra funds for the schools that remain segregated?” Mr. Hess said last week. “No, it doesn’t. I don’t know whether this policy change has been intentional, or the district slipped into it without realizing its effect.”

But Ms. Mecks countered that Chicago’s more segregated schools still do receive extra money, and that Mr. Hess failed to take into account some sources of funding.

“What we asked him to look up was all funding that would go to compensatory types of programs,” she said. “There is funding beyond desegregation funding. We have invested more resources into the lowest-performing schools, which also happen to be the most racially isolated.”

G. Alfred Hess Jr.

She said that Mr. Hess also confused the findings by lumping the racially isolated magnet schools into the broader magnet school category in his study, making it impossible to track whether that type of more segregated school had a funding edge.

“I looked at every dollar in the budget,” Mr. Hess said, adding that racially isolated magnet schools are a very small proportion of Chicago’s most-segregated schools, so that his findings still hold true.

The disagreement over whether Chicago’s segregated schools have a funding advantage comes as the district is figuring out what to do about its desegregation plan.

At a court hearing in January, U.S. District Court Judge Charles P. Kocoras said the plan was out of date and no longer viable, particularly given how the demographics of the school system had changed over the past two decades, according to Ms. Mecks.

When the consent decree was signed in 1981, 61 percent of Chicago’s students were black, 20 percent were Latino, and 17 percent were white. Latinos now constitute 36 percent of students, blacks 51 percent, Asian-Americans 3 percent, and whites 9 percent.

At a hearing in May, the school system asked for 18 months to study the issue. The judge said that, instead, the district should produce a plan by Oct. 9 to be relieved of the consent decree. Last week, upon request, the school system was given an extension until Oct. 23.

Related Tags:

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Equity & Diversity Webinar
Classroom Strategies for Building Equity and Student Confidence
Shape equity, confidence, and success for your middle school students. Join the discussion and Q&A for proven strategies.
Content provided by Project Lead The Way
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Professional Development Webinar
Disrupting PD Day in Schools with Continuous Professional Learning Experiences
Hear how this NC School District achieved district-wide change by shifting from traditional PD days to year-long professional learning cycles
Content provided by BetterLesson
Jobs Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and other jobs in K-12 education at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Equity & Diversity Q&A How Schools Can Address Racial Stressors, An Expert Explains
A Stanford researcher looks at how schools play a role in interventions for students of color dealing with racial stressors.
6 min read
Student alone in an empty school hallway (blurred). Bullying, discrimination and racism.
Pornpak Khunatorn/iStock/Getty
Equity & Diversity Educational Inequality: 4 Moments in History That Explain Where We Are Today
A new Columbia University report highlights how inequality was embedded in the creation of public education in the United States.
5 min read
This May 8, 1964 file photo shows Linda Brown Smith standing in front of the Sumner School in Topeka, Kan. The refusal of the public school to admit Brown in 1951, then nine years old, because she is black, led to the Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas. In 1954, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled the "separate but equal" clause and mandated that schools nationwide must be desegregated.
This May 8, 1964 file photo shows Linda Brown Smith standing in front of the Sumner School in Topeka, Kan. The refusal of the public school to admit Brown in 1951, then nine years old, because she is black, led to the Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas. In 1954, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled the "separate but equal" clause and mandated that schools nationwide must be desegregated.
AP Photo
Equity & Diversity The Origins of Racial Inequality in Education
"Uncovering Inequality," a project from Columbia University, chronicles how policies created and sustained inequalities in schools.
4 min read
In this May 13, 2014, file photo National Education Association staff members from Washington joining students, parents and educators at a rally at the Supreme Court in Washington on the 60th anniversary Brown v. Board of Education decision that struck down "separate but equal" laws that kept schools segregated.
In this May 13, 2014, file photo National Education Association staff members from Washington joining students, parents and educators at a rally at the Supreme Court in Washington on the 60th anniversary Brown v. Board of Education decision that struck down "separate but equal" laws that kept schools segregated.
AP Photo
Equity & Diversity Opinion 'What We Need Is Compassion Toward One Another'
Robert F. Kennedy spoke timeless words following the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. His message should guide educators today.
A.J. Rinaldi
4 min read
Mourners gather at the Ebenezer Baptist Church for funeral services for the late Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., in Atlanta, Ga., April 9, 1968. Seated from far left are, Sen. Robert Kennedy and his wife, Ethel; Archbishop Cooke of New York, in front of Kennedy; Margaretta Rockefeller, third from left in next row; Whitney Young of the Urban League, leaning forward and speaking to Atlanta Mayor Ivan Allen, at far right. Among the people standing are, Michigan Gov. George Romney, third from right; New York Mayor John Lindsay; and New York Gov. Nelson Rockefeller, far right.
Mourners, including Robert F. Kennedy, gather on April 9, 1968, at the Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta for funeral services for the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.
AP