Equity & Diversity

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Not Yet Desegregated, Court Rules

By Karla Scoon Reid — December 06, 2000 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

A federal appeals court ruled last week that the Charlotte-Mecklenburg, N.C., schools are not fully desegregated, overturning a lower-court decision that would have ended decades of busing just as the district was putting a school choice plan in place.

The Nov. 30 ruling by a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit in Richmond, Va., was not unanimous. Two judges found that the district had achieved “unitary” status in some areas, such as student discipline and faculty, but called the district’s remaining predominantly one- race schools a “vestige of segregation.”

“We must decide whether the task of desegregating Charlotte-Mecklenburg schools has reached its end,” Judges Diana Gribbon Motz and Robert B. King wrote. “We hold that it has not.”

Judge William B. Traxler Jr. wrote a dissenting opinion agreeing with the U.S. District Court’s ruling.

A lawyer representing black members of the school community praised the ruling as an affirmation that the district has not provided equal educational opportunities for black students.

But leaders of the 103,000-student district, who weren’t seeking to be released from court supervision, are scrambling to determine whether they should continue with plans to end race-based student assignment next fall.

Board members met with Superintendent Eric Smith in closed-door, emergency sessions last week. As of press time Dec. 1, they had not commented publicly.

Maree Sneed, a Washington- based lawyer with Hogan & Hartson, a firm representing the school board in the case, said she was pleased the district had prevailed in its argument.

“We think that the court made a very careful and thoughtful ruling,” she said. “Now we have to say what it means.”

Historic Case

Charlotte- Mecklenburg, where minority students, including black children, make up 60 percent of the overall student enrollment, uses busing and magnet schools to desegregate its system as part of the historic 1965 case known as Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education.

That case led to the landmark 1971 U.S. Supreme Court decision that permitted the use of mandatory busing to integrate schools, opening the way for court-ordered busing in other districts as well.

In 1997, white parents challenged the use of such tools, claiming their children were denied access to magnet programs because of their race. The parents later broadened their attack to include the district’s entire desegregation plan.

Last year, U.S. District Judge Robert D. Potter of Charlotte issued an injunction against the use of race for student assignment in the district and mandated that a new student-assignment plan be implemented in the fall of 2000. He declared the district “unitary,” or free of any indications of a dual education system for blacks and whites.

The school board appealed Judge Potter’s ruling, even as it began developing a complex plan of school choice. The district also was granted a year’s extension to start the new assignment plan.

Nora Carr, the district’s assistant superintendent for public information, said the board moved forward with the development of the choice plan last year following numerous public hearings in which parents had expressed the desire for more educational choices, neighborhood schools, and more stability about where their children attend school. The board adopted the plan in June.

The district planned to go ahead with a school showcase on Dec. 2 to allow parents and students to meet with faculty and staff members of every school. According to the school choice plan, next fall all students must select a school and will no longer be assigned to one based on their residence.

“Clearly, we’re going to need to make some decisions pretty quickly in terms of how to proceed,” Ms. Carr said.

The ruling will not have national implications because desegregation cases are based on the factual situations and legal obligations of individual districts, Ms. Sneed said.

Gloria J. Browne-Marshall, a lawyer with the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund in New York City who represents local black parents, students, and school staff members in the case, said the district likely would need to make changes to the proposed student-assignment plan.

The court’s ruling gives Charlotte-Mecklenburg the flexibility and authority to eradicate all remaining vestiges of a separate and unequal school system, she said.

“I think the Fourth Circuit Court ruling sends a message that a school system, especially one that acknowledges that there is more work to be done, should be allowed to do that,” she said.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the December 06, 2000 edition of Education Week as Charlotte-Mecklenburg Not Yet Desegregated, Court Rules

Events

Jobs Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and other jobs in K-12 education at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
Ed-Tech Policy Webinar Artificial Intelligence in Practice: Building a Roadmap for AI Use in Schools
AI in education: game-changer or classroom chaos? Join our webinar & learn how to navigate this evolving tech responsibly.
Education Webinar Developing and Executing Impactful Research Campaigns to Fuel Your Ed Marketing Strategy 
Develop impactful research campaigns to fuel your marketing. Join the EdWeek Research Center for a webinar with actionable take-aways for companies who sell to K-12 districts.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Equity & Diversity Teachers Say They Have Little Influence in Curriculum Debates
New survey paints a complicated picture of where teachers stand in debates over instruction of topics of race and gender.
4 min read
Conservative groups and LGBTQ+ rights supporters protest outside the Glendale Unified School District offices in Glendale, Calif., on June 6, 2023. Several hundred people gathered in the parking lot of the district headquarters, split between those who support or oppose teaching about exposing youngsters to LGBTQ+ issues in schools.
Conservative groups and LGBTQ+ rights supporters protest outside the Glendale Unified school district offices in Glendale, Calif., on June 6, 2023.
Keith Birmingham/The Orange County Register via AP
Equity & Diversity Spotlight Spotlight on Inclusion & Equity
This Spotlight will help you examine disparities in districts’ top positions, the difference between equity and equality, and more.
Equity & Diversity Opinion You Should Be Teaching Black Historical Contention
How to responsibly teach this critical component of Black history instruction —and why you should.
Brittany L. Jones
4 min read
A student raises their hand to ask a question before a group of assorted historical figures.
Camilla Sucre for Education Week
Equity & Diversity Opinion 2 Billion People Celebrate Lunar New Year. Your Class Can, Too
Many school districts are putting the upcoming holiday on their calendars. Guests, music, food, and red envelopes can help bring the festival alive.
Sarah Elia
4 min read
 Illustration depicting a vibrantly colored dragon winding through traditions practiced during the lunar new year.
Changyu Zou for Education Week