Report Roundup

Study Evaluates Boston's Charter Schools

"Informing the Debate: Comparing Boston's Charter, Pilot, and Traditional Schools"

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Boston's charter schools significantly outperformed the city's traditional public schools in recent years, a new, in-depth report finds, while results for the city's "pilot schools" are "less conclusive."

In some cases, the pilot schools—public schools that are freed from some district mandates and union work rules—lost ground when compared with Boston's regular public schools.

The studyRequires Adobe Acrobat Reader, released last month by researchers from the Harvard Graduate School of Education and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, generally found "large positive effects" for charter middle and high schools on student achievement, based on a review of state test scores.

To provide a richer analysis, the researchers employed two strategies. One "observational" approach sought to control for a wide variety of student factors, from prior achievement to demographics. The other was a randomized lottery analysis, in which students who were accepted to the charter and pilot schools were compared to students who applied to the same schools but were not accepted.

"Charter schools appear to have a consistently positive impact on student achievement in all [state test] subjects in both middle school and high school," the report concludes.

As for the pilot schools, at the high school level, the observational analysis found positive effects for students similar to those for charters, but the lottery analysis failed to confirm those effects.

In middle schools, the observational analysis suggested negative effects for pilot students compared to their traditional-school peers.

Vol. 28, Issue 18, Page 5

Published in Print: January 21, 2009, as Study Evaluates Boston's Charter Schools
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >