Alexander Bill Offers States More Latitude

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

A leading Republican introduced a bill last week to create a pilot project to give states greater flexibility under the No Child Left Behind Act, even though it has become clear that the Senate won’t pass a bill to reauthorize the law this year.

Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee proposed giving 12 states wide latitude in devising accountability systems and intervening in schools that fail to meet their NCLB achievement goals. In exchange, the states would agree to increase the rigor of their standards.

“In other words, instead of saying: ‘Do it exactly this way’ to the states,” Sen. Alexander said in introducing the bill Nov. 6, “the federal government would be saying: ‘Give us results, and we will give you more flexibility.’ ”

Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings promptly announced her support for the plan offered by Sen. Alexander, who was education secretary under President George H.W. Bush and is the senior Republican on the Children and Families Subcommittee of the Senate education committee.

See Also
For more stories on this topic see No Child Left Behind.

“This legislation is a reasonable and responsible step forward as Congress moves toward reauthorizing No Child Left Behind,” Ms. Spellings said in a statement.

But it’s unclear whether Sen. Alexander’s bill—or any other NCLB proposal in Congress—will advance in the near future. The day before Mr. Alexander introduced his bill, a spokeswoman for the Senate education committee acknowledged that the panel is unlikely to have enough time this year to pass a bill to reauthorize the nearly 6-year-old law.

One week earlier, a spokesman for the House Education and Labor Committee said the House was running out of time to pass a reauthorization bill this year. ("2007 NCLB Prospects Are Fading," Nov. 7, 2007.)

Seeking Bipartisan Support

Sen. Alexander’s bill seeks to respond to criticisms that the NCLB law is too prescriptive, while also maintaining the law’s goal of improving student achievement.


Education Week's David J. Hoff keeps you abreast of the latest news on the reauthorization of the No Child Left Behind Act. Read his blog, NLCB: ACT II.

To participate in the pilot, a state would have to agree to make its standards more challenging than they are now. The standards would need to be aligned with national and international exams, or to the admissions requirements of the state’s public universities.

After doing so, the state would be allowed to define what it would take for schools to achieve adequate yearly progress, and how the state would intervene in schools that failed to meet AYP goals.

Vol. 27, Issue 12, Page 23

Published in Print: November 14, 2007, as Alexander Bill Offers States More Latitude
Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories