Law & Courts

Coalition of Conn. School Leaders and Mayors Plans Finance Lawsuit

By Jeff Archer — November 15, 2005 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Connecticut appears poised to join the growing list of states that have been sued in an effort to ensure that their public schools receive enough money.

A year-old coalition of Connecticut municipal leaders, school districts, and education organizations has said that it plans to file an “adequacy” lawsuit against the state during a meeting of the group scheduled for Nov. 22.

The news comes as Gov. M. Jodi Rell has begun to form a task force to suggest changes to the state’s school finance system, but backers of the planned lawsuit said last week they still intend to forge ahead.

“I’m tired of attending meetings or being on task forces to try to tweak a system that’s broken,” said Mayor Eddie A. Perez of Hartford. “This is looking at the funding of education in the state totally, not just tweaking around the edges.”

BRIC ARCHIVE

Mr. Perez is the vice president of the group that is behind the planned suit, the Connecticut Coalition for Justice in Education Funding. Along with leaders from some two-dozen other cities and towns, members include the Connecticut school administrators’ and school boards’ associations and the state affiliates of the National Education Association and the American Federation of Teachers.

Organizers say much of their case will rest on a recent study they commissioned to determine the cost of providing learning opportunities sufficient for students to achieve state and federal performance objectives.

Carried out by the Denver-based consulting group Augenblick, Palaich, and Associates, which has done similar studies in other states, the analysis suggested Connecticut would have to add $1 billion to the $1.7 billion it now spends annually on aid to local districts for school operations in order to meet improvement goals set by the state for the No Child Left Behind Act.

Coalition members blame the shortfall on broken promises by state lawmakers. Connecticut’s current formula for distributing money to districts was adopted after an earlier school finance lawsuit resulted in a 1977 state supreme court ruling that ordered the state to alleviate inequities in spending between its low- and high-income communities.

Law School Steps In

In recent years, state-legislated caps on aid have resulted in less money for districts than the finance formula would dictate, lawsuit supporters contend. As local communities have picked up the slack through increased property taxes, the state share of spending on public schools has dropped from 46 percent to about 38 percent over the past 15 years.

Stephen Cassano, the mayor of Manchester, Conn., said his town’s school district would have gotten $26.8 million more in state support over the 10 years if the state had followed its aid formula. To make up the difference, he said, Manchester has had to raise local taxes and trim parts of the town budget.

“We’re not funding schools the way they should be, and we are clearly not funding police, fire, and other local services the way we should be,” said Mr. Cassano. He is stepping down after 14 years as mayor and serves as the executive director of the coalition behind the impending lawsuit.

Similar complaints were lodged by a group of 12 towns that backed a suit against the state in 1998, but that case was dropped by the plaintiffs five years later because of a lack of money to continue pursuing it. This time, a professor at Yale University’s law school, in New Haven, Conn., and his students have agreed to represent the plaintiffs pro bono.

Robert Solomon, who directs the law school’s clinical-practice programs, which provide students with hands-on experience, said that a special project, the Education Adequacy Project, was set up to handle the case.

Noting that the Connecticut Constitution guarantees a “suitable and substantially equal educational opportunity,” Mr. Solomon said the plaintiffs’ challenge would be to convince a court that the right way to meet that guarantee is through a funding mechanism based on what it costs to give students the education they need.

“The remedy is much more critical than proving liability,” he said.

Judd Everhart, a spokesman for Gov. Rell, said the Republican state leader considered the threatened lawsuit “unfortunate.” In September, the governor announced plans to form a task force to recommend ways to fix the school funding system to be considered in the 2006 legislative session, which begins in February.

Her office said that it expects to appoint members of that task force in the coming weeks. Other members will be appointed by the legislature.

Related Tags:

Events

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Teens Drop Lawsuit Against Trump's Trans Sports Order After Supreme Court Ruling
The Supreme Court last month upheld state bans on transgender girls in school sports.
4 min read
Two teens challenging New Hampshire's new law banning transgender girls from girls' sports teams, Parker Tirrell, third from left, and Iris Turmelle, sixth from left, pose with their families and attorneys in Concord, N.H., Aug. 19, 2024.
Parker Tirrell, third from left, and Iris Turmelle, sixth from left, pose with their families and attorneys in Concord, N.H., Aug. 19, 2024. The teens initially sued over New Hampshire's law banning transgender girls from school sports teams, and later expanded their lawsuit to challenge President Donald Trump's February 2025 executive order threatening to withhold federal funds from schools that allow transgender girls to join girls' sports teams. They've since withdrawn the legal challenge following a Supreme Court ruling allowing states to ban transgender girls from sports under Title IX.
Holly Ramer/AP
Law & Courts What Schools Need to Know About the Supreme Court’s Transgender Sports Ruling
The justices upheld two state laws that bar transgender girls from participating in female sports.
10 min read
A group prays outside of the Supreme Court ahead of the court's ruling on whether transgender girls and women can play on school athletic teams, on June 30, 2026, on Capitol Hill in Washington.
A group prays outside of the U.S. Supreme Court ahead of the court's ruling on whether transgender girls and women can play on school athletic teams, on June 30, 2026, in Washington. The court upheld two state laws barring transgender girls from joining girls' school sports teams.
Jose Luis Magana/AP
Law & Courts Judges Strike Down Trump Admin.'s Student Loan Forgiveness Overhaul
Two judges sided with advocates who said the program risked becoming a tool for political retribution.
3 min read
In this May 5, 2018, file photo, graduates at the University of Toledo commencement ceremony in Toledo, Ohio.
Graduates at the University of Toledo commencement ceremony in Toledo, Ohio, on May 5, 2018. Two judges have ruled against the Trump administration's overhaul of a public service loan forgiveness program for which teachers have qualified.
Carlos Osorio/AP
Law & Courts Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship, Rejecting Trump's Proposed Limits
The justices relied on the 14th Amendment and federal law to rule that anyone born in the U.S. is a citizen.
4 min read
Members of the Supreme Court sit for a group portrait in Washington, Oct. 7, 2022. Bottom row, from left, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Samuel Alito and Justice Elena Kagan. Top row, from left, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Justice Neil Gorsuch, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. The Supreme Court justices will take the bench Monday, July 1, 2024, to release their last few opinions of the term, including their most closely watched case: whether former President Donald Trump has immunity from criminal prosecution.
Members of the Supreme Court sit for a group portrait in Washington, Oct. 7, 2022. Bottom row, from left, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Samuel Alito, and Justice Elena Kagan. Top row, from left, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Justice Neil Gorsuch, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. The high court, on June 30, 2026, rejected President Donald Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP