Despite Diagnoses, Girls as Likely as Boys To Have Reading Disability, Study Reveals

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Despite a widespread assumption to the contrary, girls are just as likely as boys to have a reading disability, according to a study published last month.

But schools are more likely to diagnose the condition in boys, the researchers said, because their classroom behavior may be more disruptive.

"In general, teachers rate boys as significantly more active, more inattentive, and less dexterous and as having more problems in behavior, language, and academics than their female peers," writes Sally Shaywitz, the primary author of the report. "Yet, despite teacher reports of difficulties in the classroom, the measured overall ability and achievement of boys is comparable with that of girls."

Dr. Shaywitz's study, published in the Aug. 22-29 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association, is among a handful of investions this year reaching the same conclusion. A second, unrelated study is now being prepared for publication and a third has been published in part. Experts said the three studies, taken together, present an important challenge to the long-held belief in the field that reading disabilities are more common among boys.

Dr. Shaywitz, who is co-director of the Center for the Study of Learning and Attention Disorders at Yale University, and other researchers followed 445 Connecticut children from kindergarten through 3rd grade.

In 2nd grade, the researchers found, the schools identified four times as many boys as girls as having reading disabilities. In 3rd grade, the number of reading-disabled boys diagnosed by educators was twice as high as it was for their female classmates.

But, when the researchers used some of the same kinds of testing instruments to screen all the students independently, equal numbers of boys and girls in both grades were found to have the disability.

Dr. Shaywitz said some bias in schools' methods for diagnosing reading-disabled students may occur at two junctures: first, when teachers initially refer students for special-education testing, and second, following completion of the objective tests, when teachers, parents, and other professionals meet to determine whether a child needs special education.

"If the child is a girl who doesn't have some of these striking behavioral characteristics, they might be more likely to say, 'Why don't we wait awhile and see what happens,"' Dr. Shaywitz said. "People need to look beyond the behaviors and look at what is happening to the child in terms of academic achievement."--DV

Vol. 10, Issue 1

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >