Bickering Exposes the Frailty of Summit's Consensus

Article Tools
  • PrintPrinter-Friendly
  • EmailEmail Article
  • ReprintReprints
  • CommentsComments

Charlottesville, Va--Moments after President Bush and several governors had pledged to make the summit a substantive, bipartisan effort to redefine education reform, a sharp and searing debate erupted.

The debate, which came last Wednesday in one of the summit's first working sessions, pitted governors against the White House and Democrats against Republicans.

The confrontation was significant, several summit participants observed, because it starkly exposed the thin web of consensus holding the historic meeting together.

The lively session in question was moderated by William J. Bennett, the nation's drug-policy coordinator and former Secretary of Education, who opened the meeting with a quote from Aristotle: "We should be candid and of good will."

According to an account of the closed meeting from Gov. Evan Bayh of Indiana, one of the governors at the session suggested that the nation should reorder its priorities to provide more funds for education, prompting Mr. Bennett to reply: "Well, you certainly passed the candid test."

But many at the meeting--as well as several participants at a post-session press briefing--wondered aloud whether Mr. Bennett himself had passed the test of "good will."

After Mr. Bennett's remarks, conversation at the session, which was to have focused on the learning envi4ronment, turned quickly to a debate over federal funding.

Descriptions of the session from governors and governors' aides ranged from "spirited" and "vigorous" to an outright "row."

Sources said the scene was almost comical, with some of the governors jumping into the fray, while others nervously read from prepared statements.

During the news briefing after the session, Mr. Bennett characterized the meeting by saying that there had been "feisty exchanges" about the relative merits of defense and education spending.

"The tone was tilted neither to partisanship nor nonpartisanship," he said.

But it was Mr. Bennett's next series of remarks that made him a major topic of discussion on Thursday, the second day of the summit:

"There was pap--standard Democratic pap and standard Republican pap. There was a lot something that rhymes with pap."

"There were occasional outbursts of candor and attempts to suppress them," he continued. "Much of the discussion reflected little knowledge of what works."

Govs. Raymond E. Mabus of Mississippi and Guy Hunt of Alabama, who shared the stage with Mr. Bennett at the post-session briefing, stood silently at the former Secretary's side.

When it was his turn to speak, Mr. Mabus noted that Mr. Bennett had not specified who was uninformed and that "there were Administration people in there, too."

Mr. Bennett responded, his voice dripping with sarcasm: "I didn't know anything. The governors knew a lot. That's the way it was."

On Thursday, governors and their aides expressed varying levels of indignation, and there were indications that White House officials disapproved as well.

Gov. Terry E. Branstad of Iowa, chairman of the National Governors' Association, said several people had "expressed regret that the Secretary was somewhat flip in his remarks."

"I thought Mr. Hunt and Mr. Mabus handled themselves well," he said. "I think Secretary Bennett went overboard."

Frank Newman, president of the Education Commission of the States and a summit observer, said he was not surprised by Mr. Bennett's remarks--given his outspoken record as Secretary of Education during the Reagan Administration.

"He's made a career of slashing," Mr. Newman said. "This is a group of people trying to build, and he is not the person to do it."

Many summit participants and observers said the Bennett session and subsequent remarks represented the low point of the summit.

The tone in the other closed sessions, some of which were also marked by discussions of the need for more federal funding, was more constructive than destructive, they said.

Still, the Bennett session was not the only sign of discord among summit participants.

In a memo circulated before the meeting, Gov. Bill Clinton of Arkansas, a chief planner of the event, complained about the White House's insistence that gubernatorial staff members be barred from the small, issue-oriented sessions.

Mr. Clinton also complained that the White House had decided to permit only Administration aides to prepare a summary of the closed discussions.

At the last moment, the White House did relent and allowed the governors to bring a note-taker to the sessions.

The White House did not budge, however, on allowing the press to attend the sessions, a decision Mr. Clinton also said he disagreed with.

One governor's aide said he wondered whether the White House strategy of keeping the governors, their aides, and the press apart was an attempt to "divide and conquer."

Planning for the historic meeting not only pitted governors against the White House, but also prompted some divisions among the governors themselves.

In an interview before the summit, Gov. Garrey E. Carruthers of New Mexico, chairman of the Education Commission of the States,4said, "There has been a lot of political intrigue along the way."

"I think it is highly unusual that a couple of Democratic governors have taken it upon themselves to release position papers while most of the Republican governors have shown a great deal of restraint," the Republican Mr. Carruthers said. "It suggests to me that there is a jockeying for position of leadership at the education summit."

Mr. Carruthers also said he saw the press conference by Congressional Democrats earlier this month as an attempt to "pre-empt the President."

But in the end, summit observers said, the political maneuvering and the meeting's format had little effect on the substance of the final summit agreement.

The document was hammered out late Wednesday night and early Thursday morning at the Boar's Head Inn in Charlottesville by Mr. Clinton; Mr. Branstad; Gov. Carroll A. Campbell of South Carolina; Roger B. Porter, Mr. Bush's domestic-policy adviser; and John Sununu, the White House chief of staff.

Mr. Clinton said that a first draft was circulated to the governors about 2 A.M. Thursday and that another followed shortly after sunrise.

Given the amount of political posturing that occurred before and during the summit, and given the meeting's shaky first session, many governors expressed some surprise that, in the end, the web of consensus survived.

Said Gov. Thomas Kean of New Jersey: "It is amazing the number of controversial things we were finally able to agree on."

Vol. 09, Issue 05

Notice: We recently upgraded our comments. (Learn more here.) If you are logged in as a subscriber or registered user and already have a Display Name on, you can post comments. If you do not already have a Display Name, please create one here.
Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Back to Top Back to Top

Most Popular Stories





Sponsor Insights

Vocabulary Development for Striving Readers

Free Ebook: How to Implement a Coding Program in Schools

Successful Intervention Builds Student Success

Effective Ways to Support Students with Dyslexia

Stop cobbling together your EdTech

Integrate Science and ELA with Informational Text

Can self-efficacy impact growth for ELLs?

Disruptive Tech Integration for Meaningful Learning

Building Community for Social Good

5 Resources on the Power of Interoperability from Unified Edtech

New campaign for UN World Teachers Day

5 Game-Changers in Today’s Digital Learning Platforms

Hiding in Plain Sight - 7 Common Signs of Dyslexia in the Classroom

The research: Reading Benchmark Assessments

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

All Students Are Language Learners: The Imagine Learning Language Advantage™

Shifting Mindsets: A Guide for Training Paraeducators to Think Differently About Challenging Behavior

How to Support All Students with Equitable Pathways

2019 K-12 Digital Content Report

3-D Learning & Assessment for K–5 Science

Climate Change, LGBTQ Issues, Politics & Race: Instructional Materials for Teaching Complex Topics

Closing the Science Achievement Gap

Evidence-based Coaching: Key Driver(s) of Scalable Improvement District-Wide

Advancing Literacy with Large Print

Research Sheds New Light on the Reading Brain

Tips for Supporting English Learners Through Personalized Approaches

Response to Intervention Centered on Student Learning

The Nonnegotiable Attributes of Effective Feedback

SEE MORE Insights >