U.S. Supreme Court to Weigh Church-State Aid Case With Potentially Broad Impact

By Mark Walsh — January 16, 2016 3 min read

The U.S. Supreme Court has granted review of a church-state case that could hold major implications for government aid to religious schools.

The justices on Friday agreed to hear the appeal of a Lutheran church and preschool in Missouri that was denied a grant from a state program to use recycled tires to build safer playgrounds.

The denial, by a federal district court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit, in St. Louis, was based on the Missouri constitution’s prohibition against providing any money, “directly or indirectly, in aid of any church, sect, or denomination of religion.”

But the case, Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia v. Pauley (No. 15-577), has significance well beyond scrap tire remnants and preschool playgrounds.

“The rule adopted by the Eighth Circuit—and numerous other courts—threatens to marginalize religious schools, churches, and other faith-based entities from public life in the United States by licensing religious discrimination against them in the administration of public benefits,” says a friend-of-the-court brief filed on the Lutheran church’s side by the Association of Christian Schools International, a Colorado Springs, Colo.-based group whose membership includes more than 3,000 schools in the United States (and more than 20,000 outside this country).

The potential scope of the Trinity Lutheran case is exemplified by another appeal that is pending at the Supreme Court. In Douglas County School District v. Taxpayers for Public Education (Case No. 15-557), the school district and other parties are appealing a June 2015 decision by the Colorado Supreme Court that struck down the program because it aided religious schools in violation of the state constitution.

The pending appeal in the Douglas County case raises a broad question—whether language in Colorado’s constitution barring government aid to religion was born of 19th Century anti-Catholic bigotry and violates the U.S. Constitution. The language against government aid to religion in Colorado’s constitution, and those of about three dozen other states, are referred to as “Blaine amendments.”

They are named for the 19th-century congressman James G. Blaine, who led an unsuccessful effort to amend the U.S. Constitution to prohibit public funding of “sectarian” schools at a time when Roman Catholics were pressing for government funding for parochial schools.

A More Narrow Scope

The Trinity Lutheran appeal granted by the justices on Jan. 15 was framed somewhat differently. It asks whether the 8th Circuit incorrectly interpreted a 2004 Supreme Court decision about aid to theology majors.

In Locke v. Davey, the court upheld a Washington state scholarship program that excluded theology majors against a challenge that such an exclusion violated the First Amendment free-exercise-of-religion clause.

The Trinity Lutheran church contends the 8th Circuit court mistakenly interpreted Locke as requiring the exclusion of a church from a neutral state aid program where there was no valid concern that the aid would amount to a government establishment of religion.

“No public benefit could be further removed from the state’s antiestablishment concerns than a grant for safe rubber playground surfaces that serve no religious function or purpose,” said the church’s appeal, which was filed by the Alliance Defending Freedom, a Scottsdale, Ariz.-based legal group. “This court should grant review to establish that, whatever Locke‘s scope, its holding does not apply to the wholly secular benefit of providing safe play areas for kids.”

Although the Trinity Lutheran appeal downplayed the Blaine Amendment backdrop for Missouri’s state constitutional language, the Supreme Court could certainly address that question.

The case is likely to be argued in March or April, with a decision due by late June.

A version of this news article first appeared in The School Law Blog.

Let us know what you think!

We’re looking for feedback on our new site to make sure we continue to provide you the best experience.


This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Future of Work Webinar
Digital Literacy Strategies to Promote Equity
Our new world has only increased our students’ dependence on technology. This makes digital literacy no longer a “nice to have” but a “need to have.” How do we ensure that every student can navigate
Content provided by
Mathematics Online Summit Teaching Math in a Pandemic
Attend this online summit to ask questions about how COVID-19 has affected achievement, instruction, assessment, and engagement in math.
School & District Management Webinar Examining the Evidence: Catching Kids Up at a Distance
As districts, schools, and families navigate a new normal following the abrupt end of in-person schooling this spring, students’ learning opportunities vary enormously across the nation. Access to devices and broadband internet and a secure

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Data Analyst
New York, NY, US
New Visions for Public Schools
Project Manager
United States
K12 Inc.
High School Permanent Substitute Teacher
Woolwich Township, NJ, US
Kingsway Regional School District
MS STEM Teacher
Woolwich Township, NJ, US
Kingsway Regional School District

Read Next

Education Obituary In Memory of Michele Molnar, EdWeek Market Brief Writer and Editor
EdWeek Market Brief Associate Editor Michele Molnar, who was instrumental in launching the publication, succumbed to cancer.
5 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: December 9, 2020
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: Stories You May Have Missed
A collection of articles from the previous week that you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: Stories You May Have Missed
A collection of stories from the previous week that you may have missed.
8 min read