Find your next job fast at the Jan. 28 Virtual Career Fair. Register now.

Rural States Rank Low on Standards Review

By Mary Schulken — July 21, 2010 3 min read

Most states with large numbers of rural students—as well as those with the highest percentages of small, rural districts—have language and math guidelines inferior to proposed common academic-content standards, according to a report by the Thomas B. Fordham Institute.

A quick analysis also shows that most states in which the majority of school districts are small and rural have not adopted the higher common standards, developed through the Common Core State Standards Initiative. Several of the more populous rural states, meanwhile, have embraced the voluntary guidelines.

In eight states, at least half of all rural districts are smaller than the 535-student median enrollment size for public school districts nationwide, according to Why Rural Matters 2009, a biennial statistical snapshot compiled by the Rural School and Community Trust and based heavily on information from the National Center for Education Statistics. Those states: North Dakota, Montana, Vermont, South Dakota, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Maine, and Alaska. While the numbers of students in those schools and states may be low, they represent a key constituency in rural education. Such districts are among the nation’s tiniest and most geographically isolated. Many have high percentages of students living at or below the federal poverty level.

The Fordham study judged standards in all but one of those states—Oklahoma—to be inferior to the common standards in both language arts and math guidelines. Oklahoma’s language arts and math guidelines ranked favorably with the common standards.

Only two of those eight states—North Dakota and Oklahoma—have adopted the common standards. (See our updated map below, and keep up with the latest state adoptions of the standards at Curriculum Matters.)

In general, states with high numbers of rural students and rural schools did not fare well in the study of existing state guidelines, although many of them have embraced common standards.

Here’s a summary, by the numbers:

States that have the largest numbers of rural students, according to National Center for Education Statistics information, include, in order of enrollment, North Carolina, Texas, Georgia, Ohio, Virginia, Pennsylvania, New York, Tennessee, Michigan, California, and Alabama. The four states with the largest rural enrollments—North Carolina, Texas, Georgia, and Ohio—together serve one in four of all rural students in the nation.

Of those, the Fordham study found North Carolina’s and Ohio’s language arts guidelines inferior to the common standards. It ranked Texas too close to call and gave Georgia a B-plus.

In math guidelines, Georgia scored an A-minus, while the other top rural states (North Carolina, Texas, and Ohio) ranked inferior. (To cross-reference all rural states, see the complete list of state rankings accompanying Education Week writer Stephen Sawchuk’s coverage of this issue.)

Seven of those 11 most-populous rural states have adopted the common standards, including North Carolina, Georgia, and Ohio. Texas has not.

Here’s a summary of how majority rural-school states fared:

In 15 states, the majority of schools are classified as rural: South Dakota, Montana, North Dakota, Vermont, Maine, Alaska, Nebraska, Wyoming, Arkansas, Iowa, Oklahoma, New Hampshire, Alabama, West Virginia, and Kansas.

The Fordham study gave existing standards in two of those states, Oklahoma and Alabama, a B-plus and a B, respectively, on language arts guidelines. It ranked standards in the rest inferior. For math guidelines, those same two states got B-plus grades, while the rest scored inferior to common standards.

Of the 15 majority rural-school states, only five have adopted common standards: Wyoming, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Hampshire, and West Virginia.

A version of this news article first appeared in the Rural Education blog.


This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
School & District Management Webinar
Branding Matters. Learn From the Pros Why and How
Learn directly from the pros why K-12 branding and marketing matters, and how to do it effectively.
Content provided by EdWeek Top School Jobs
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
School & District Management Webinar
How to Make Learning More Interactive From Anywhere
Join experts from Samsung and Boxlight to learn how to make learning more interactive from anywhere.
Content provided by Samsung
Teaching Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table With Education Week: How Educators Can Respond to a Post-Truth Era
How do educators break through the noise of disinformation to teach lessons grounded in objective truth? Join to find out.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Human Resources Manager
Madison, Wisconsin
One City Schools
Elementary Teacher - Scholars Academy
Madison, Wisconsin
One City Schools
Special Education Teacher
Chicago, Illinois
JCFS Chicago
Communications Officer
Chattanooga, Tennessee
Hamilton County Department of Education

Read Next

Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: January 13, 2021
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Obituary In Memory of Michele Molnar, EdWeek Market Brief Writer and Editor
EdWeek Market Brief Associate Editor Michele Molnar, who was instrumental in launching the publication, succumbed to cancer.
5 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: December 9, 2020
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: Stories You May Have Missed
A collection of articles from the previous week that you may have missed.
8 min read