Opinion
Education Letter to the Editor

‘What Works’ Director Says Critical Letter Is Incorrect

March 18, 2008 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

To the Editor:

James P. Connell’s Feb. 20, 2008, letter to the editor about the What Works Clearinghouse’s review of research on the First Things First school reform model suggests that the clearinghouse based its conclusions on an incomplete review of the available research evidence. This is incorrect.

For the record, the clearinghouse conducted a literature search to identify research that related to the First Things First model. In November 2007, we shared with the Institute for Research and Reform in Education, which developed the First Things First model and where Mr. Connell serves as president, citations for the five studies that the literature search had identified (including four that were part of one evaluation), and asked the institute to suggest studies that the search may have missed. The institute responded in December with an additional citation, a study by Henry M. Levin that Mr. Connell cites in his letter. The study was a cost-benefit analysis that did not estimate the effectiveness of First Things First, and for this reason it was not added to the review.

The What Works Clearinghouse’s effectiveness ratings are based only on studies that pass its evidence standards. Of the five studies of First Things First, one met these standards. Full citations for these five studies, as well as the specific reasons four of them did not pass the clearinghouse’s evidence standards, are found in our report on First Things First. In the study that did meet the evidence standards, a replication of the First Things First model in Houston, the effects were not statistically significant or large enough to be meaningful.

As Education Week noted in its article that prompted Mr. Connell’s letter (“U.S. Review Finds No Proof That Reform Model Works,” Feb. 6, 2008), more research on First Things First is under way, and the clearinghouse will incorporate new findings of effectiveness when it updates its report on First Things First.

Mark Dynarski

Director

What Works Clearinghouse

Senior Fellow

Mathematica Policy Research Inc.

Princeton, N.J.

A version of this article appeared in the March 19, 2008 edition of Education Week as ‘What Works’ Director Says Critical Letter Is Incorrect

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Artificial Intelligence Webinar
Managing AI in Schools: Practical Strategies for Districts
How should districts govern AI in schools? Learn practical strategies for policies, safety, transparency, and responsible adoption.
Content provided by Lightspeed Systems
Jobs Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and K-12 education jubs at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Absenteeism Webinar
Turning Attendance Data Into Family Action
This California district cut chronic absenteeism in half. Learn how they used insight and early action to reach families and change outcomes.
Content provided by SchoolStatus

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Education Quiz The Ed. Dept. Has a New Funding Priority. Can You Guess It?
Test your knowledge on the latest news and trends in education.
1 min read
Education Letter From the Editor-in-Chief
Here's why we did it.
We knew that our online content resonated strongly across our many robust digital platforms, especially during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. It has remained consistently high in the wake of the 2024 presidential election, which ushered in massive changes to federal K-12 education policies.
3 min read
Education Week Editor-in-Chief Beth Frerking, second from left, reviews pages for the new print magazine alongside members of the visuals team in the Bethesda, Md., newsroom on June 24, 2025.
Education Week Editor-in-Chief Beth Frerking, second from left, reviews pages for the new print magazine alongside members of the visuals team in the Bethesda, Md., newsroom on June 24, 2025.
Jaclyn Borowski/Education Week
Education Quiz Do You Think You’re Up to Date on the School Funding Changes? Take This Weekly Quiz
Test your knowledge on the latest news and trends in education.
1 min read
Education Quiz Why Are 24 States Suing Trump? Take the Weekly Quiz
Test your knowledge on the latest news and trends in education.
1 min read