Find your next job fast at the Jan. 28 Virtual Career Fair. Register now.
Opinion
Education Opinion

Groupies

By Nancy Flanagan — July 22, 2010 2 min read

Very interesting and complex piece by Marion Brady in yesterday’s Answer Sheet. Whether you agree or disagree with his observations and prescriptions, Brady is a master at cutting through policy-speak and illuminating what happens in the classroom, between teachers and students. Unfortunately, many Talking Ed-Heads find the discourse on pedagogy dull and squishy.

This sentence jumped out at me:

[Students] learn more in small groups working together on a challenge than they do competing one-on-one.

I agree with that, supported by lots of observed and evaluated evidence from 30 years’ worth of student work in my own classroom. Not all group work is good, of course--too much of it is poorly conceived and designed--but a lot of traditional pedagogical methods and strategies, from the lecture to “seat work,” end up being intellectually unproductive, too. You can’t group kids for every concept or skill taught--but when groups are cooking, hooked on an interesting idea or goal, there’s a certain synergy at work.

Over at The Core Knowledge Blog, Diana Senechal takes deadly aim at a group-work template for brainstorming that she found at the Pennsylvania Department of Education website. The piece is masterfully wicked satire, an entertaining description of the familiar process-heavy, content-free lesson plan. Some of her commenters, however, are ready to trash group work, especially brainstorming, on principle.

One displeased-with-all-this-nonsense commenter provides research on the relative merit of individually brainstormed ideas over the products of group brainstorming. Since brainstorming was developed to generate multiple, divergent ideas and increase buy-in by groups doing project work, this assertion seemed a little ego-bound, if not churlish, to me: My ideas are better than the groups’ ideas, so why brainstorm? Go ahead and brainstorm, but I still win.

What the research actually endorses as optimum is “hybrid” brainstorming, where people generate ideas on their own, then bring them to a group for sorting, selecting and possible combination. The study comes out of the field of management science--R & D for product development--so I’m not entirely sure that it’s applicable to evaluating the learning of a bunch of 7th graders sitting in a circle, coming up with pre-writing topics for essays.

Senechal’s point about not being able to generate ideas until one has mastered sufficient content knowledge is a good one--but that doesn’t mean group work doesn’t benefit its members. In a doctoral class, I was assigned a partner-written paper on educational equity policy. My collaborator was a Chinese woman. We split the writing duties--I’d analyze current policy and she would research the background of equity issues in America. When we met to combine our work, she was excited about what she’d learned, asking “Have you ever heard of the Civil War?”

I guess it’s possible to see that conversation as a waste of my time as a serious scholar, but in truth, I learned a great deal about my own nation and its formalized positions on equity through her eyes. I believe that the core issue here relates to Brady’s point: the worry is not shoddy work product from groups, but a fear that competition will take a back seat to equitable access.

Who stands to lose when kids are heterogeneously grouped for graded projects? The student who’s always been the shining star, ahead of the pack. When children are taught that grades are a competition, the perennial winners are loath to relinquish their status.

The opinions expressed in Teacher in a Strange Land are strictly those of the author(s) and do not reflect the opinions or endorsement of Editorial Projects in Education, or any of its publications.

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Branding Matters. Learn From the Pros Why and How
Learn directly from the pros why K-12 branding and marketing matters, and how to do it effectively.
Content provided by EdWeek Top School Jobs
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
How to Make Learning More Interactive From Anywhere
Join experts from Samsung and Boxlight to learn how to make learning more interactive from anywhere.
Content provided by Samsung
Teaching Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table With Education Week: How Educators Can Respond to a Post-Truth Era
How do educators break through the noise of disinformation to teach lessons grounded in objective truth? Join to find out.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Head of Lower School
San Diego, California
San Diego Jewish Academy
Head of Lower School
San Diego, California
San Diego Jewish Academy
Project Manager (Contractor)
United States
K12 Inc.
Elementary Teacher
Madison, Wisconsin
One City Schools

Read Next

Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: January 13, 2021
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Obituary In Memory of Michele Molnar, EdWeek Market Brief Writer and Editor
EdWeek Market Brief Associate Editor Michele Molnar, who was instrumental in launching the publication, succumbed to cancer.
5 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: December 9, 2020
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: Stories You May Have Missed
A collection of articles from the previous week that you may have missed.
8 min read