Educator-turned congressman Tim Walz plans to shake up Washington.
Until last spring, Tim Walz was a high school teacher and football coach from southern Minnesota. He had no political experience whatsoever, but he didn’t like the choices being made on Capitol Hill, and struggled to explain them to his social studies students.
So Walz made a decision: He would run for Congress as a Democrat. On the cam paign trail, the barrel-chested former National Guardsman called for a new approach to the war in Iraq and sharply criticized the No Child Left Behind Act, calling it a “bureaucratic nightmare.”
We visited Walz in his congressional offices just weeks after he arrived. He gushed about his favorite perks—tours of the Capitol dome and the private reading room at the Library of Congress—seeming wide-eyed and still a little surprised to find himself in Washington, as though he has to occasionally pinch himself.
When we sat down to talk about how he came to power and what he hopes to change, though, Walz became all business, slipping into the polished persona of a far more experienced statesman.
How did you decide to run for Congress?
I was very frustrated by the direction of the country, and I’d been giving it some thought. Some of my neighbors and people in town thought that this was the time for a teacher—someone who was more grounded in what people really care about—and that’s when I said yes. A bit naively, I might add, but we did it.
How did your students and your teaching colleagues react?
They were inspired by the idea that if you think something needs to be changed, that you have an obligation to go out and do it.
Did you expect to win?
We believed we could win, and, as it turned out, I think the skill set of teaching served me well.
The biggest thing is communicating an idea. It’s trying to get people to be involved and to look at the facts. ... Teaching is the same way. You’re trying to present a system of facts; you’re trying to teach students what’s the best way to think about problems to solve them in a rational way.
Which is more challenging, teaching or politics?
Right now they’re about equal. Somebody said, “Do you feel like you’re juggling about 10 balls?” and I said, “Yeah, and that’s pretty much what I came from before.” The biggest thing here is I actually get some support help. Of course, with budget cuts in education, we do our own copying, our own everything. Here I get some help.
Tell us about your experiences as a teacher with the No Child Left Behind law.
The goal and the ambition of NCLB is one that all teachers share. … My experience, though, is that NCLB and the application of it has had very little impact on real student achievement.
We do have large [achievement] gaps, especially in some of our subgroups. I’m a firm believer that the best way to eliminate those gaps is to never let them get started. So when we’re cutting money from early childhood education, we’re ending up with a gap.
It’s taught me, as a teacher, that we have to take ownership of this because we have the expertise in this, and we need to define what success is going to look like instead of having someone do that for us.
What did you see in your classroom that made you want to come to Washington?
The discourse in general in the country was very discouraging to our younger generation. They quite honestly don’t understand why we continue to circle and circle on some issues … and why we’re not addressing global warming, why we’re not addressing the crisis in the Middle East, why we’re not doing investments in cancer and AIDS research, and why we’re seeing cuts in all those things.
So your students’ frustration inspired you?
I didn’t think there was a civil discourse. I didn’t think people were actually here [on Capitol Hill] to solve problems. I thought this was more about a narrow agenda and more ideological than practical. It actually came up several times, students would say this: “Well, what are you going to do about it?” And [the answer] finally became, “I’m going to run for Congress.” They thought that was all right. The thing that felt so gratifying was that they saw nothing crazy about it.
Do you think NCLB can be fixed?
It’s going to be hard. I think there’s going to be resistance to trying to fix it the way it needs to [be fixed].
If you could have your way, would you scrap the law or revamp it?
I would start over, because what I found is when you try [to fix a law], you get a monstrosity with a lot of attachments—Band-Aids and duct tape.
What do you most hope to accomplish while you’re in Washington?
I want to make college more affordable. I want to make more students believe that they are an American dream. I want to have more Americans have faith that this works for them, not against them.
Vol. 18, Issue 05, Pages 10-11