Teacher-Preparation Accountability

"Measuring What Matters: A Stronger Accountability Model for Higher Education"

States should overhaul accountability systems for teacher-preparation programs to include a variety of gauges of teacher effectiveness, a report from the Washington-based Center for American Progress urges.

Accountability requirements put into place in the 1998 rewrite of the federal Higher Education Act have largely failed to signal program quality, with states identifying fewer than 2 percent of preparation programs as low-performing, according to recent federal data cited in the report. New indicators, the report says, should include “value added” measures of teacher effectiveness, classroom-based observations of teachers, better teacher assessments, surveys of program graduates and district administrators, and retention rates of program graduates in districts. They should apply equally to traditional programs and to alternative-certification routes, it argues.

The report also notes that states now use a mix of some 1,100 teacher tests to gauge basic skills, content knowledge, and pedagogical knowledge. It concludes that those tests should be replaced with common measures and benchmarks.

By Stephen Sawchuk

Vol. 29, Issue 37, Page 5

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Login | Register

Ground Rules for Posting
We encourage lively debate, but please be respectful of others. Profanity and personal attacks are prohibited. By commenting, you are agreeing to abide by our user agreement.
All comments are public.

Viewed

Emailed

Commented

6935 Arlington Road, Bethesda MD 20814 301-280-3100 1-800-346-1834

Teacher-Preparation Accountability

"Measuring What Matters: A Stronger Accountability Model for Higher Education"

Access selected articles, e-newsletters and more!

Viewed

Emailed

Recommended

Commented

Sponsored Whitepapers