School-Based Health Centers Await Boost Under New Law
$200 million in federal aid, to roll out over four years, has yet to begin flowing.
School-based health centers, which provide comprehensive medical care to students beyond the standard school-nurse clinic model, are awaiting a big boost from the federal government under the law overhauling the nation’s health-care system.
The legislation provides a guaranteed $200 million over four years to help centers pay for capital improvements, like buying medical equipment or expanding or improving building space.
The bill also authorizes the government to distribute additional money for operating costs, such as salaries for medical professionals.
The measure is important because it created a federal authorization for the first time that is specific to school-based health clinics, which were once a controversial innovation. And with other sources of funding pinched by budget constraints at the local and state levels, supporters say the clinics need a federal infusion of cash to keep their doors open.
The money isn’t flowing as readily as some supporters may have hoped, however. Though the money for operating expenses is authorized, it has not been appropriated by Congress. Seven Democratic senators wrote a letter July 8 to Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, the chairman of the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education in favor of funding. The letter said that many centers “are at risk of cutting services or even closing” and asked the panel to set aside $50 million next fiscal year for the centers. The subcommittee did not designate funds during its markup session July 27.
Linda Juszczak, the executive director of the National Assembly on School-Based Health Care, in Washington, said that the organization and its members would continue lobbying for $50 million a year in operating funds, in addition to the money for capital improvements. At the same time, the organization is working with clinics to improve their cost-management procedures and to increase reimbursements from other sources, such as private insurance and Medicaid.
“We’re not planning on walking away from this on a federal level,” Ms. Juszczak said.
Close to Students
Meanwhile, the mandatory appropriation for capital costs has gone through some changes that have drawn out the disbursement process.
Health centers were first given until the end of July to submit applications for that money. However, the federal Health Resources and Services Administration postponed the application process until September. The delay was due to the high number of questions clinic administrators had about the application process, and the limited time that health centers would have had to develop their requests, the agency said.
Nearly 2,000 school-based health centers around the country provide comprehensive medical, mental-health, and social services to approximately 1.7 million children and adolescents. They are located in 44 states and the District of Columbia, with more than half in urban areas, according to a 2007-08 school year census conducted by the National Assembly on School-Based Health Care. Twenty-seven percent of the centers are in rural areas, with the remainder in suburban communities.
In addition to dealing with students who get sick at school, medical personnel at the centers dispense and in some cases prescribe medication; help students manage chronic illnesses, such as diabetes and asthma; in some cases, provide medical care for students’ infant children; and offer reproductive-health-related services such as gynecological exams and screening for sexually transmitted infections.
The birth control services offered by some school-based health centers remains a contentious issue. Language included in the new federal health-care law prevents school-based health centers that receive federal aid from performing abortions, though none do now, Ms. Juszczak said. The distribution of birth-control pills, condoms, or other contraceptives from the health centers is governed by local regulations.
Supporters of the centers say they help keep comprehensive health services close to where they’re needed most. “We keep students in the school and achieving academically,” Ms. Juszczak said.
But the centers, which have existed since the 1960s, have always had to piece together various funding sources to stay open, such as federal grants, state and local aid, and private grants.
Keeping Doors Open
Kathleen Conway, the administrator for pediatrics for the Henry Ford Health System in Detroit and the director for its school-based and community health program, oversees 11 school-based health centers, most of which are located in that city’s middle and high schools.
The clinics under her jurisdiction provide mental health care, obesity-prevention programs, and dental service. About $1 million of the centers’ $2.7 million yearly budget comes from the nonprofit health system, which also manages hospitals and medical facilities in southeastern Michigan; just under $1 million comes from the state of Michigan; and several smaller pots of money provide the rest of the funding, Ms. Conway said.
But the centers have endured budget cuts in recent years. Last year, employees at the centers volunteered to get paid for only 37 hours of work each week instead of 40, in order to save money and prevent centers from closing.
“It’s really unfortunate that these cuts are coming right at the very time people need us most,” she said of the reductions from existing sources.
The health department in Prince George’s County, Md., runs school-based health centers in four county high schools, providing school physicals, mental-health services, immunizations, and reproductive-health exams, said Frances J. Caffie-Wright, the centers’ program manager.
In her suburban county, next door to Washington, “the need is for sustaining existing centers,” she said. “It doesn’t make sense to have very plush, laid-out centers if you can’t provide the services.”
For example, the centers in Prince George’s County once were able to provide dental services, but those services had to be cut in 2006.
“It’s important to keep [the centers] that have been successful going,” Ms. Caffie-Wright said.
Vol. 29, Issue 37, Page 17