State Tests, NAEP Often a Mismatch
Bars Defining 'Proficient' Unaligned, Study Shows
Many of the states that claim to have large shares of their students reaching proficiency in reading and mathematics under the No Child Left Behind Act have set less stringent standards for meeting that threshold than lower-performing states , a new federal study finds.
The study drew an immediate and strong reaction from many public officials and education advocates, who said it laid bare states’ vastly divergent standards for testing students.
The report judges states’ reading and math tests against a common yardstick: the proficiency standards used by the National Assessment of Educational Progress , often referred to as...
This article is available to subscribers only.
To keep reading this article and more, subscribe now or start a 2-week FREE trial.
Subscribe to Education Week
You Save 20% or More!
Viewed
Emailed
Recommended
Commented
Sponsored Whitepapers
• Best Practices in Information Management, Reporting and Analytics for Education
• Smart infrastructure report to get your district ready for future IT needs.
• Integrating Social and Emotional RTI to Improve Student Performance
• Taming the wild west: How America’s third largest school district manages PCs, Macs, and iPads
• Overcoming the Odds: Getting Every Student to College YES Prep Shares Its Success Story
- Openings for 2013-2014
- Newton Public Schools, Newton, MA
- Principal
- Christ the King Preparatory School, NJ
- Superintendent
- Round Rock ISD, Round Rock, TX
- Principal
- The Berkeley Institute, HAMILTON, Bermuda
- Principal
- Chattahoochee Hills Charter School, Multiple Locations


