Law & Courts

End Near for Chicago Desegregation Decree

By Andrew Trotter — May 16, 2006 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

A federal judge overseeing a 26-year-old school desegregation case in Chicago has indicated that as long as some details are added, he is inclined to approve a proposed final settlement between the school system and the U.S. Department of Justice that could end court supervision of the district by July of next year.

“The end is clearly in sight,” U.S. District Judge Charles P. Kocoras said during a May 4 hearing on the proposed settlement for concluding the consent decree, the Chicago Tribune reported.

But responding to objections raised by civil rights lawyers, the judge gave the American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois until May 25 to propose a list of details that it believes should be addressed in the settlement.

Race in Chicago

The Chicago school system says that racial integration of its schools has remained elusive because some 90 percent of its enrollment is made up of minority-group members. White students make up a smaller proportion of enrollment than they did when the district first entered into a school desegregation consent decree in 1980.

*Click image to see the full chart.

Click to enlarge: Race in Chicago

Note: The remaining 2.5 percent in 1980 and 3.4 percent today were made up of students of other races.
SOURCE: Chicago Public Schools

Chicago dragged its feet in the 1960s and ’70s on efforts to desegregate its schools. It largely escaped the severe rancor that resulted from court-ordered busing in another Northern city, Boston. In late 1980, President Jimmy Carter’s administration, sensing that civil rights enforcement would be less vigorous under incoming President Ronald Reagan, exacted what commitments it could from the Chicago system, and the two sides entered a consent decree.

Under the 1980 decree, the Chicago district operates a system of magnet schools to provide racially and ethnically diverse educational options by attracting students from neighborhoods across the city.

The decree, which was extensively modified in 2004, also has preschool, after-school, summer school, and reading programs, as well as offerings for English-language learners. Complying with the decree costs the 427,000-student system more than $300 million a year beyond the regular annual budget of $4.2 billion, district officials say.

When the school system entered into the consent decree a quarter-century ago, white students’ share of enrollment had already declined to 17 percent. Today, whites make up only 9 percent of enrollment.

Magnet School Plans

The school district said the magnet schools’ specialized educational programs would continue after court supervision ended.

Arne Duncan, the chief executive officer of the Chicago school system, said in a press statement that while the proposed settlement would relieve the district of the significant financial burden of producing regular compliance reports, the district remains firmly committed to desegregation.

The agreement “means more money will go toward improving learning in the classroom, rather than to lawyers making reports to the court,” he said on May 2, the day after the proposed settlement was filed in federal court.

But Harvey Grossman, the legal director of the ACLU of Illinois, said the proposed plan has too many loose ends.

“We are concerned about the lack of justification of the changes that the parties have now agreed to and are seeking court approval of,” he said in an interview last week.

The settlement needs to clarify issues such as the school system’s ability to change school attendance boundaries and the future of the magnet program, he said.

School boundaries “have always been recognized as a tool that the board could use to limit or … increase diversity or potentially relieve some of the conditions of racially isolated schools,” Mr. Grossman said.

And he said that while the district affirmed that magnet schools would continue, those schools effectively are the only source of racial diversity in the city’s predominantly white neighborhoods.

Before being released from the decree, the school system should be required to show what its future plans are for the magnet schools, Mr. Grossman said.

Public Hearing Planned

The proposed settlement would also let the district continue using majority-to-minority transfers, which allow students to move from schools in which they are in the racial or ethnic majority to ones in which they would be in the minority when space and transportation are available, and “open-enrollment schools,” which are nonmagnet schools that accept transfers from other attendance zones.

Mr. Grossman said that “while it’s difficult to make a broad generalization, generally the schools in white neighborhoods are better equipped” and receive more money from private sources such as PTAs than schools in mostly minority neighborhoods do.

At the May 4 hearing, Judge Kocoras canceled a two-week series of public hearings that had been scheduled to begin May 15. The proposed settlement will be aired later at a public hearing. If Judge Kocoras approves the settlement, the mayorally appointed Chicago board of education will also have to do so.

Events

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Teens Drop Lawsuit Against Trump's Trans Sports Order After Supreme Court Ruling
The Supreme Court last month upheld state bans on transgender girls in school sports.
4 min read
Two teens challenging New Hampshire's new law banning transgender girls from girls' sports teams, Parker Tirrell, third from left, and Iris Turmelle, sixth from left, pose with their families and attorneys in Concord, N.H., Aug. 19, 2024.
Parker Tirrell, third from left, and Iris Turmelle, sixth from left, pose with their families and attorneys in Concord, N.H., Aug. 19, 2024. The teens initially sued over New Hampshire's law banning transgender girls from school sports teams, and later expanded their lawsuit to challenge President Donald Trump's February 2025 executive order threatening to withhold federal funds from schools that allow transgender girls to join girls' sports teams. They've since withdrawn the legal challenge following a Supreme Court ruling allowing states to ban transgender girls from sports under Title IX.
Holly Ramer/AP
Law & Courts What Schools Need to Know About the Supreme Court’s Transgender Sports Ruling
The justices upheld two state laws that bar transgender girls from participating in female sports.
10 min read
A group prays outside of the Supreme Court ahead of the court's ruling on whether transgender girls and women can play on school athletic teams, on June 30, 2026, on Capitol Hill in Washington.
A group prays outside of the U.S. Supreme Court ahead of the court's ruling on whether transgender girls and women can play on school athletic teams, on June 30, 2026, in Washington. The court upheld two state laws barring transgender girls from joining girls' school sports teams.
Jose Luis Magana/AP
Law & Courts Judges Strike Down Trump Admin.'s Student Loan Forgiveness Overhaul
Two judges sided with advocates who said the program risked becoming a tool for political retribution.
3 min read
In this May 5, 2018, file photo, graduates at the University of Toledo commencement ceremony in Toledo, Ohio.
Graduates at the University of Toledo commencement ceremony in Toledo, Ohio, on May 5, 2018. Two judges have ruled against the Trump administration's overhaul of a public service loan forgiveness program for which teachers have qualified.
Carlos Osorio/AP
Law & Courts Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship, Rejecting Trump's Proposed Limits
The justices relied on the 14th Amendment and federal law to rule that anyone born in the U.S. is a citizen.
4 min read
Members of the Supreme Court sit for a group portrait in Washington, Oct. 7, 2022. Bottom row, from left, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Samuel Alito and Justice Elena Kagan. Top row, from left, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Justice Neil Gorsuch, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. The Supreme Court justices will take the bench Monday, July 1, 2024, to release their last few opinions of the term, including their most closely watched case: whether former President Donald Trump has immunity from criminal prosecution.
Members of the Supreme Court sit for a group portrait in Washington, Oct. 7, 2022. Bottom row, from left, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Samuel Alito, and Justice Elena Kagan. Top row, from left, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Justice Neil Gorsuch, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. The high court, on June 30, 2026, rejected President Donald Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP