Assessment

Testing Watchdog in Funding Squeeze

By Rhea R. Borja — March 06, 2006 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Tongues wagged in the education world when FairTest, the Cambridge, Mass.-based watchdog of the testing industry, disclosed last month that it had only enough money to operate through 2006.

At its high-water mark in the 1990s, FairTest had an annual budget of $500,000 and a full-time staff of six. But funding from its two main donors, the Ford Foundation and the Joyce Foundation, has been “phased down or phased out,” said Robert Schaeffer, a spokesman for the nonprofit group, formally known as the National Center for Fair & Open Testing. As a result, it has cut its budget to $168,000 and laid off all but two people.

The news came to light when Michael Winerip of The New York Times wrote what some observers saw as a paean to FairTest in the newspaper’s Feb. 22 “On Education” column. The piece praised the 21-year-old organization as one of the few outspoken voices to question the influence of standardized testing and lamented the group’s possible demise.

Education bloggers were less charitable. Alexander Russo of This Week in Education called the group “marginalized and extreme.” Andrew J. Rotherham of Eduwonk sniped that Mr. Winerip was “source greasing.” And Mike Antonucci of Intercepts said it was “awfully sporting” of Mr. Winerip to “raise money for FairTest.”

Mr. Schaeffer said donors had given $4,000 via the FairTest Web site in the two days after the column ran, and others had pledged support. “We’re in the middle of a down cycle,” he said. “But rumors of our imminent demise are not accurate.”

FairTest is axing its quarterly print newsletter but will offer an electronic version eight times a year. The group is also shifting its fund-raising focus to individual donors through its mailing lists and online.

Stanley Rabinowitz, the director of assessment- and standards-development services for the San Francisco-based research group WestEd, said that while he doesn’t usually agree with FairTest, it provides “an important voice” in the testing debates.

“The stakes of tests have changed, … so perhaps their criticisms are more valid today than they were 10 years ago,” he said. “The more voices in the market, the better it is for consumers.”

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
Your Questions on the Science of Reading, Answered
Dive into the Science of Reading with K-12 leaders. Discover strategies, policy insights, and more in our webinar.
Content provided by Otus
Mathematics Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table: Breaking the Cycle: How Districts are Turning around Dismal Math Scores
Math myth: Students just aren't good at it? Join us & learn how districts are boosting math scores.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Student Achievement Webinar
How To Tackle The Biggest Hurdles To Effective Tutoring
Learn how districts overcome the three biggest challenges to implementing high-impact tutoring with fidelity: time, talent, and funding.
Content provided by Saga Education

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Assessment The 5 Burning Questions for Districts on Grading Reforms
As districts rethink grading policies, they consider the purpose of grades and how to make them more reliable measures of learning.
5 min read
Grading reform lead art
Illustration by Laura Baker/Education Week with E+ and iStock/Getty
Assessment As They Revamp Grading, Districts Try to Improve Consistency, Prevent Inflation
Districts have embraced bold changes to make grading systems more consistent, but some say they've inflated grades and sent mixed signals.
10 min read
Close crop of a teacher's hands grading a stack of papers with a red marker.
E+
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Assessment Sponsor
Fewer, Better Assessments: Rethinking Assessments and Reducing Data Fatigue
Imagine a classroom where data isn't just a report card, but a map leading students to their full potential. That's the kind of learning experience we envision at ANet, alongside educators
Content provided by Achievement Network
Superintendent Dr. Kelly Aramaki - Watch how ANet helps educators
Photo provided by Achievement Network
Assessment Opinion What's the Best Way to Grade Students? Teachers Weigh In
There are many ways to make grading a better, more productive experience for students. Here are a few.
14 min read
Images shows colorful speech bubbles that say "Q," "&," and "A."
iStock/Getty