Education

Federal Court Finds Draft Law Applied Illegally

By Tom Mirga — November 24, 1982 2 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

A federal district judge in Los Angeles has ruled that the nation’s draft-registration law is illegal because the Carter Administration violated federal rules when it put the law into effect during the summer of 1980.

U.S. District Judge Terry J. Hatter Jr. issued that opinion last week in dismissing charges against David A. Wayte, a former Yale University student from Pasadena who had been indicted for failure to register for the draft.

The draft law requires all young men to register for military conscription within a month of their 18th birthday. Those convicted on charges of failure to register face a maximum penalty of five years in federal prison and a $10,000 fine.

To date, 13 men have been indicted on such charges, and four have been convicted. Mr. Wayte’s case is the first in which charges have been dismissed since the government actively began prosecuting nonregistrants this summer.

Order to be Appealed

In a short statement, the Justice Department said it believed the opinion “is wrong.” The department said it “will appeal the entire order” issued by Judge Hatter before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and will “proceed with the indictment and prosecution of nonregistrants in a routine manner” until its appeal is considered.

A spokesman for the Selective Service System said the draft agency will continue processing registration forms as usual. The agency will also continue cross-checking registration lists with state driver’s license and Internal Revenue Service computer tapes in order to locate nonregistrants.

Mr. Wayte’s lawyers defended his decision not to register on two fronts. First, they claimed that the government had unfairly chosen to prosecute him and several other vocal nonregistrants, hoping that publicity generated by their trials would spur most of the estimated 400,000 to 500,000 nonregistrants nationwide to sign up.

‘Selective Prosecution’

Last month, Judge Hatter ordered federal lawyers to produce documents related to the government’s so-called “selective prosecution” strategy and also ordered Edwin Meese 3rd, the President’s counselor, to testify about the strategy at Mr. Wayte’s trial. The Justice Department and the Presidential counselor, however, have refused to comply with those orders.

Second, Mr. Wayte’s counsel argued, the entire system of registration is illegal because former President Carter ordered the draft sign-up to begin 21 days after the law was published in the Federal Register. In doing so, he said, the President violated a 30-day public-notice rule.

Judge Hatter agreed with Mr. Wayte’s lawyers on both of those points.

Opponents of the draft-registration law hailed the dismissal of the charges against Mr. Wayte at a press conference here last week, predicting that it would set a precedent for all other nonregistrants facing similar charges.

“The government’s refusal to turn over important information to Judge Hatter indicates that there was an attempt to cover up their decision to selectively prosecute nonregistrants,” said Teresita J. Ferrera, co-chairman of the Committee Against Registration and the Draft. “We are optimistic that other courts around the country will accept this defense.”

Ms. Ferrera also called Judge Hatter’s decision to invalidate the entire registration program “a significant setback for the Selective Service System.”

“The government broke its own law when it failed to adhere to its own regulations,” she said. “They did not allow the public sufficient time to respond.”

A version of this article appeared in the November 24, 1982 edition of Education Week as Federal Court Finds Draft Law Applied Illegally

Events

School Climate & Safety K-12 Essentials Forum Strengthen Students’ Connections to School
Join this free event to learn how schools are creating the space for students to form strong bonds with each other and trusted adults.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Assessment Webinar
Standards-Based Grading Roundtable: What We've Achieved and Where We're Headed
Content provided by Otus
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
Creating Confident Readers: Why Differentiated Instruction is Equitable Instruction
Join us as we break down how differentiated instruction can advance your school’s literacy and equity goals.
Content provided by Lexia Learning

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Education Opinion The 10 Most-Read Opinions of 2023
Here are Education Week’s most-read Opinion blog posts and essays of 2023.
2 min read
Collage of lead images for various opinion stories.
F. Sheehan for Education Week / Getty
Education Letter to the Editor EdWeek's Most-Read Letters of 2023
Read the most-read Letters to the Editor of the past year.
1 min read
Illustration of a line of diverse hands holding up speech bubbles in front of a subtle textured newspaper background
iStock/Getty
Education Briefly Stated: November 1, 2023
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Briefly Stated: October 11, 2023
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read