Leadership Symposium Early Bird Deadline Approaching | Join K-12 leaders nationwide for three days of empowering strategies, networking, and inspiration! Discounted pricing ends March 1. Register today.
Classroom Technology

What Factors Make-or-Break Ed-Tech Implementation? Study Takes a Look

By Michele Molnar — March 17, 2020 4 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

When an ed-tech product doesn’t get much traction in the school district that bought it, someone inevitably asks: What went wrong?

The EdTech Genome Project last year started to tackle that problem to help educators and district administrators make better-informed decisions about education technology.

The “genome” project—a collaborative effort involving more than 100 education research and advocacy organizations—is mapping the many factors that influence the outcome of an ed-tech product’s usage.

Ultimately, they identified about 80 variables. And recently, they winnowed the field to what they deemed to be the 10 most worthy of more study this year. Those implementation factors are:

  • Adoption plans
  • Competing priorities
  • Foundational resources, such as technology and financial resources and operational tech support
  • Implementation plans
  • Professional development/learning and support
  • School or staff culture
  • Support from school and district administration
  • Teacher agency or autonomy
  • Teachers’ beliefs about technology/self-efficacy and technological pedagogical-content knowledge
  • Vision for teaching and learning with technology

Each variable is being evaluated further by a working group that will build consensus about how to define and measure them those factors, said Bart Epstein, the president and CEO of the Jefferson Education Exchange, which is leading the project. JEX is a nonprofit affiliated with the University of Virginia Curry School of Education and Human Development.

These variables that make or break implementation echo comments Johns Hopkins University has heard in its longitudinal studies of school districts’ ed-tech initiatives, said Steven M. Ross, a senior research scientist and professor at the Center for Research and Reform in Education there.

Although Johns Hopkins has not studied the same 10 factors, many of them have been mentioned as important by teachers and administrators in the center’s ongoing work with such districts as 111,000-student Baltimore County in Maryland and 188,000-student Fairfax County in Virginia, he said.

“All of those factors are valuable to look at,” said Ross, “but, ultimately, the question is, ‘What raises achievement and what doesn’t?’”

What the Research Reflects

Having good implementation doesn’t necessarily mean math scores will go up, he said. “That may depend on the teacher.”

Epstein said the genome project identified the variables by reviewing academic research that showed they could be responsible for the success or failure of various interventions. Some studies found that it was impossible to get statistically significant data because a product or program wasn’t used enough, he said.

Among the working-group members trying to get more clarity by studying specific variables are representatives from school districts, research organizations, nonprofits, and companies across the country.

Eventually, the collaborating organizations plan to publish an implementation framework for educators, companies, and other interested parties late this year.

“Education is overdue to do what every other industry has done, which is to develop shared instruments of measurement and language to describe how the tools of their trade are applied,” said Epstein.

The lack of a common language and means of monitoring progress has created a challenge for teachers and administrators alike, according to Epstein.

“One thing that keeps coming up over and over is how much frustration there is in education when we have to rely on anecdotes,” he said. “When you go into a school and ask, ‘How much agency and authority do teachers have about the decision to bring in technology?,’ you’re almost sure to get anecdotes.”

The point of conducting this research is to “help schools understand how ready they are—or are not—for different products, programs, and policies,” said Epstein. “Districts across the U.S. are spending billions of dollars on well-intentioned efforts that fail because they don’t have the data to understand that their environment is not conducive to the success of what they’re buying.”

Did Specific Tools Work?

Ross commended the project’s intention to help districts conduct self-evaluations in areas they want to improve, and, he said the variables may be a useful checklist with “good discussion points” for educators and administrators alike. But he said they should have “reasonable expectations” about outcomes since “the jury is out as to what degree these tools and resources are actually used to make changes.”

Meanwhile, plans are underway for the next phase of study on implementation.

Next year, JEX expects to develop a platform that will allow districts to document the technologies in their classrooms, how they were chosen, and what the implementation is like. “In the interim, we’re collecting research manually and paying cash stipends to large numbers of educators in return for their taking the time to provide this information,” Epstein said.

The teachers document their experiences and perspectives to help ed-tech decisionmakers and policymakers understand and explain why any given ed-tech tool can work in some environments but not in others.

“The goal,” Epstein said, “is to avoid educators’ buying things that won’t work.”

Related Tags:
Product Implementation Research District Leadership

A version of this article appeared in the March 18, 2020 edition of Education Week as Project Probes Gaps in Districts’ Ed-Tech Usage

Events

Jobs Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and other jobs in K-12 education at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
Science of Reading: Emphasis on Language Comprehension
Dive into language comprehension through a breakdown of the Science of Reading with an interactive demonstration.
Content provided by Be GLAD
English-Language Learners Webinar English Learners and the Science of Reading: What Works in the Classroom
ELs & emergent bilinguals deserve the best reading instruction! The Reading League & NCEL join forces on best practices. Learn more in our webinar with both organizations.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Classroom Technology AI Policies Should Leave Room for Teachers and Students to Mess Up, Superintendents Say
Superintendents whose districts have crafted AI policies discussed establishing guardrails and encouraging the AI-hesitant to try it out.
4 min read
Photo collage of woman using tablet computer and AI icon.
iStock / Getty Images Plus
Classroom Technology AI Is Common Thread Through the Big Challenges Schools Are Facing, New Report Says
Recruiting and retaining educators, cybersecurity, and scaling innovation across schools are some of the biggest challenges.
3 min read
School-aged boy using laptop in classroom.
iStock / Getty Images Plus
Classroom Technology 8 Tips for Schools to Avoid Chaos in the Age of AI
Most district leaders are in the beginning stages of figuring out how to integrate AI into K-12 education.
6 min read
A group of researchers studies elements impacted by artificial intelligence
Kathleen Fu for Education Week
Classroom Technology What Is Age-Appropriate Use of AI? 4 Developmental Stages to Know About
Child development experts and teachers offer advice on when K-12 students should start using AI-powered tech and for what purposes.
11 min read
Elementary, Middle, and High-school age children interact with a giant artificial intelligence brain.
Kathleen Fu for Education Week