Classroom Technology Q&A

Ed-Tech Skeptic Larry Cuban Finds New Perspective

By Benjamin Herold — February 07, 2017 5 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Few observers have been more skeptical of technology’s role in K-12 education than Stanford University professor Larry Cuban, whose books are an essential guide to understanding how technological innovations are frequently “domesticated” by schools and teachers.

But after three decades of writing about the classroom limitations of technology, Cuban decided a year ago to take a different tack.

Since then, he’s been poking around Silicon Valley’s most tech-savvy educational efforts, from the Facebook-affiliated Summit Public Schools charter network, to private-school-network-slash-software-company Alt School, to the algorithm-driven Teach to One model, to a handful of traditional public schools that have adopted technology “whole hog.”

The goal is to better understand how such models are using the internet, computers and tablets, software, and social-media platforms for teaching and learning.

That’s significant, he said, because such schools have shifted their focus to using technology to support learning, rather than on adopting technology for technology’s sake.

That’s not to say Cuban is optimistic that such models will be scalable. Nor does he see technology dramatically reshaping the fundamental building blocks of school, despite the frequent claims of those who believe tech-driven personalized learning can disrupt and transform the “factory model” of education.

But what Cuban is seeing are “meaningful, incremental improvements in how teachers organize and teach a lesson.”

And that, he says, is worth paying attention to.

This transcript of the conversation has been edited for length and clarity.

BRIC ARCHIVE

Has what you’ve seen made you less skeptical?

What I saw impressed me greatly. Teachers are regularly and easily integrating technology. It’s now in the background, as common as paper and pencils and blackboards were decades ago. The fact that it’s moved from the foreground to the background, to, “What are the learning goals of this lesson?” and “When and how can I use these technologies to best achieve those goals?"—I saw that going on and was very impressed.

The types of classroom lessons you’ve been describing on your blog are not “transformative” or radically new.

“Transformative” is the language of hype, of vendors, promoters, and technologically driven reformers. I am not advocating for that.

Public schools in a democratic, capitalistic society serve multiple functions: making kids literate, preparing them for the workplace, passing on the moral values of community. The socialization that schools must perform, that’s where a lot of the stability in classroom practice comes from. So what I see is generally not transformative. I do see changes, however. I do see new additions to teachers’ repertoires.

You describe observing a spectrum of approaches to personalized learning. Can you explain that?

The last major effort to try to transform teaching occurred in the early part of the 20th century, with the progressive education movement. There were two wings of the movement. One was focused on pedagogy, with John Dewey’s idea of learning through doing and the whole child. The other wing was focused on efficiency: measuring everything, testing, and making sure that schools are efficient mechanisms for preparing students for adult society. Both of those wings continue today. When it comes to personalized learning, at one end, you have competency-based education, or the behaviorist approach of a Teach to One (a program that personalizes middle school math instruction through algorithms.) That’s the efficiency-driven wing of the progressive movement.

At the other end of the spectrum are the pedagogical progressives, who believe in more student decisionmaking and more project-based, independent learning where kids are following their passions.

In the middle, of course, are a lot of hybrids.

You described AltSchool as one of the few existing examples of that pedagogical-progressive approach.

I saw four classes over two mornings, so this is my take on a narrow observation. What I saw was pretty close to what John Dewey described. He would have nodded his head next to me.

The company is very aggressive about collecting massive amounts of student and classroom data to inform its approach. Did you come away from your observations optimistic that such an analytics-driven technology infrastructure can support progressive pedagogy?

I saw the efficiency wing of the progressive movement, too, in the way the company has hired software engineers, and they are on-site and constantly helping the technology platform become more efficient. But the teachers they’ve hired are generally five to 15 years into their careers. They’re risk-takers. And they mostly seem to have already had these progressive pedagogical beliefs in their heads. So I think AltSchool marries both the efficiency and the pedagogy wings of the progressive educational movement in an unusual way. And I think it’s promising, yes. But it also costs$26,000 [per student] a year. How will it turn out and will it have any impact on public schools? It’s too soon for me to make any predictions.

At Summit Public Schools, you seem to have been more taken with the network’s stable, flexible leadership than with its use of technology.

Summit goes beyond a particular teacher in a particular classroom. This was a whole school plan to integrate technology and put it in the background, not the foreground. I saw how they develop a school culture, hire teachers, socialize everyone working in that system to have that kind of direction. And it’s in a public school. I saw that at work and I was impressed with it.

What stood out to you in the Summit classrooms you observed?

There are three basic activities that teachers use in any class: whole-group instruction, small-group instruction, and independent work. What I saw at Summit, compared to other schools, was less whole group, and more small group and more independent. And the technology helped with that small group and independent learning.

Did that also apply to Summit’s focus on “habits of success” and other nonacademic skills?

A good chunk of that was also aided by technology. I saw kids assessing how far along they were on goals they had set. That’s unusual and hard to do in a group of 25 to 30 with one teacher. I saw technology as making that more possible in the hands of an expert teacher.

So have you gone from ed-tech skeptic to believer?

I wouldn’t go that far. Skepticism is in my DNA.

A version of this article appeared in the February 08, 2017 edition of Education Week as Ed-Tech Skeptic Finds a New Perspective

Events

Jobs Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and other jobs in K-12 education at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
English-Language Learners Webinar English Learners and the Science of Reading: What Works in the Classroom
ELs & emergent bilinguals deserve the best reading instruction! The Reading League & NCEL join forces on best practices. Learn more in our webinar with both organizations.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Teaching Webinar
Challenging the Stigma: Emotions and STEM
STEM isn't just equations and logic. Join this webinar and discover how emotions fuel innovation, creativity, & problem-solving in STEM!
Content provided by Project Lead The Way

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Classroom Technology How Young Is Too Young to Teach Students About AI? Survey Reveals Differing Opinions
Educators overwhelmingly agree that students need to learn how AI works, but at what age, exactly, is a source of debate.
4 min read
A young kid using a tablet building robot game with a chat bot notification face icon pop up
iStock/Getty Images
Classroom Technology From Our Research Center Will AI Use in Schools Increase Next Year? 56 Percent of Educators Say Yes
Some districts are already looking for ways the technology might help save educators' time.
1 min read
Illustration of a network of laptops around a chatbot
iStock/Getty
Classroom Technology Opinion Ed Tech Can Be an Invaluable Tool for Teachers. Here’s How to Use It Best
Ed-tech tools can enhance student learning. But teachers need to ensure they can prove meaningful and promote fact-based knowledge.
10 min read
Images shows colorful speech bubbles that say "Q," "&," and "A."
iStock/Getty
Classroom Technology From Our Research Center Does Your District Ban ChatGPT? Here's What Educators Told Us
More than three-quarters of educators say their districts haven't banned ChatGPT and other AI tools.
1 min read
Vector illustration of the letters AI partially breaking through the red circle and slash symbol representing it being banned
iStock/Getty