Ed-Tech Policy

‘Cyberporn’ Is Not a School Problem, Experts Say

By Peter West — September 06, 1995 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Any federal law that tried to crack down on minors’ access to on-line pornography would probably have little impact on educational telecommunications, according to many educators.

Schools already can employ a variety of preventive measures to keep most student “cybersurfers” from gaining access to pornography and other illicit materials from school computers, those who administer educational-telecommunications networks say.

As Congress works on legislation to deregulate the telecommunications industry, much media attention has focused on what has been dubbed “cyberporn.”

Both the House and the Senate held hearings this summer on the availability of on-line pornography to children, and the telecommunications bill approved by the Senate in July would permit the Federal Communications Commission to impose fines and imprisonment on those who make such materials available to minors.

Sen. Charles E. Grassley, R-Iowa, has also introduced a separate measure that would give the Department of Justice the authority to prosecute such cases.

There are no such provisions in the House telecommunications bill. Neither Senate bill specifically discusses school access, and most observers say “cyberporn” is not a major problem for schools.

Home Use Likelier

Much of the concern about children’s access to electronic pornography was generated by a study, produced this spring by a student at Pittsburgh’s Carnegie Mellon University, that most experts say wildly exaggerated the prevalence of such materials on-line, and by a subsequent cover story in Time magazine about the study.

Although such materials do exist--in commercial on-line services, public Internet forums, or the World Wide Web, a growing segment of the Internet that contains images as well as text--the average school user is unlikely to see them, most educators argue, because student use of on-line resources is limited and students are usually closely supervised.

A relatively small number of schools provide classroom access to the Internet, the global computer network; students most often tap into telecommunications services from a central location, such as a media center or library.

“It’s ironic, because generally speaking, the kids aren’t getting [pornographic material] at school, they’re getting it at home,” said Cheryl S. Williams, the director of technology programs at the National School Boards Association.

Still, experts say, schools should take some precautions.

The Texas Education Network “home page” on the World Wide Web provides access to a collection of publications that deal with the question of appropriate on-line access for students. The network, known as TENET, also will hold a seminar for schools this fall to discuss the legal and ethical aspects of on-line access.

Taking Precautions

A new state law requires telecommunications companies to contribute to wiring classrooms, and thus many schools will be dealing with such questions in coming months, said Connie Stout, the director of TENET, a joint venture of the state education agency and the University of Texas system that gives K-12 educators low-cost access to the Internet. (See Education Week, Aug. 2, 1995.)

Many districts, added Kurt A. Steinhaus, the director of learning technologies for the New Mexico Department of Education, are contracting with private companies to erect in their computer networks so-called firewalls, which bar access to certain information. Restrictive software can also be installed in individual machines.

But Frank Withrow, the director of learning technologies for the Council of Chief State School Officers, suggested that “a clever kid is going to get around anything.”

Mr. Withrow, Ms. Stout, and Mr. Steinhaus all stressed that the best preventive measure is to teach students the appropriate use of the medium and discipline them if they abuse their privileges.

Some districts also require parental permission before students can use the Internet in school.

“The behavior should be similar to taking the class out on a field trip,” Mr. Stout said.

Meanwhile, the nonprofit Information Technology Association of America, based in Arlington, Va., has named a panel to study ways that service providers can regulate pornography on the Internet.

A version of this article appeared in the September 06, 1995 edition of Education Week as ‘Cyberporn’ Is Not a School Problem, Experts Say

Events

Jobs Regional K-12 Virtual Career Fair: DMV
Find teaching jobs and K-12 education jubs at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
College & Workforce Readiness Webinar
CTE for All: How One School Board Builds Future-Ready Students
Discover how CPSB uses partnerships and high-quality digital resources to build equitable, future-ready CTE pathways for every student.
Content provided by Cengage School
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Artificial Intelligence Webinar
Making AI Work in Schools: From Experimentation to Purposeful Practice
AI use is expanding in schools. Learn how district leaders can move from experimentation to coordinated, systemwide impact.
Content provided by Frontline Education

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Ed-Tech Policy Nation's 2nd Largest District Moves to Limit Student Screen Use
LAUSD will limit classroom screen time, emphasizing quality learning over device use.
Photos of board members decorate the walls inside LAUSD headquarters Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2026, in Los Angeles.
Photos of board members decorate the walls inside LAUSD headquarters Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2026, in Los Angeles. The Los Angeles Board of Education recently voted to limit screen time in classrooms.
Damian Dovarganes/AP
Ed-Tech Policy Letter to the Editor Don’t Ban Phones, Limit Them
Phones can be useful tools, says a high school student.
1 min read
Education Week opinion letters submissions
Gwen Keraval for Education Week
Ed-Tech Policy Welcome to the 'Funky' Politics of the Tech in Schools Debate
The Trump administration is cheerleading AI in schools as GOP lawmakers crack down on ed tech.
9 min read
In this Oct. 5, 1980, file photo, Nancy Armstrong, a teacher at the Marshall elementary school in Harrisburg, Pa., assists her students in the use of computers to aid them in their studies. Today’s grandparents may have fond memories of the “good old days,” but history tells us that adults have worried about their kids’ fascination with new-fangled entertainment and technology since the days of dime novels, radio, the first comic books and rock n’ roll.
In this Oct. 5, 1980, file photo, Nancy Armstrong, a teacher at Marshall Elementary School in Harrisburg, Pa., assists her students in the use of computers to aid them in their learning. The debate about how much time students should spend using technology to learn has been around for decades, but is now heating up in Congress and state legislatures and creating some unlikely allies.
Paul Vathis/AP
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Ed-Tech Policy Whitepaper
Something Has Shifted: Phone-Free Schools in 2026
This report explores what’s driving the shift, what schools are seeing in classrooms, and what it means for leaders navigating student ph...
Content provided by Yondr