Assessment

Nation’s Report Card: How ELLs Fared in 2011

By Lesli A. Maxwell — November 02, 2011 2 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

As the edu-world now well knows, the 2011 NAEP results are out and the news is somewhat promising in math and disappointing in reading.

Let’s take a look at how English-language learners fared on this year’s exam. In 4th-grade reading, 70 percent of ELLs scored below basic and 7 percent were at or above proficient, an ever so slight uptick from 2009 when those percentages were 71 and 6, respectively. In 8th grade reading, 71 percent of ELLs were below basic and just 3 percent scored at or above proficient. In 2009, 75 percent of 8th grade ELLs were below basic, with 3 percent scoring at or above proficient.

In 4th grade math, 42 percent of ELLs were below basic (compared to 43 percent in 2009) while 14 percent were at or above proficient (compared to 12 percent in 2009). In 8th grade, 72 percent scored below basic and 5 percent were at or above proficient, which represents no change from 2009.

But just how reflective of the overall ELL population were NAEP test takers in 2011?

This is an important question because 2011 was to be the first administration of the NAEP since the exam’s governing board began pushing states and school districts to exclude fewer students who are English-language learners and who have disabilities.

In 2011, 11 percent of 4th grade ELLs were excluded from the reading portion of NAEP in the nation as a whole (See Table A-9), compared to 16 percent two years ago, when the NAEP reading and math exams were last given. For 8th grade ELLs, the exclusion rate dropped from 17 percent in 2009 to 14 percent. That seems like real progress. For the math exam, (See Table 9) 4 percent of 4th grade ELLs were excluded, compared to 6 percent in 2009; and 7 percent of 8th grade ELLs were excluded, compared to eight percent two years before.

State by state, the rates of exclusion on the reading test (the exclusion rates were generally smaller on the math exam) lay bare the wild variation in how representative a slice of the overall ELL population ends up taking the test. In California, home to the most ELLs in the nation, 4 percent were excluded from the reading test this year, down a single percentage point from 2009 when 5 percent were excluded.

In Georgia, more than 30 percent of ELLs were excluded from the reading test, a rate that has changed little in the last several administrations of the test. I’m sure the ELL population in Georgia has grown significantly and may explain in part why the number of exclusions hasn’t changed more. Kentucky—and I’m not sure why, so perhaps someone can enlighten us—excluded 63 percent of ELLs from the test, up from an already high figure of 43 percent in 2009.

The states with the lowest rates of excluding ELLs from NAEP—with a rate of 1 percent each—were Arizona and Nevada, both home to large numbers of English learners.

I am interested to hear from the experts about these NAEP results for English-language learners.

Related Tags:

A version of this news article first appeared in the Learning the Language blog.


Commenting has been disabled on edweek.org effective Sept. 8. Please visit our FAQ section for more details. To get in touch with us visit our contact page, follow us on social media, or submit a Letter to the Editor.


Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Teaching Webinar
What’s Next for Teaching and Learning? Key Trends for the New School Year
The past 18 months changed the face of education forever, leaving teachers, students, and families to adapt to unprecedented challenges in teaching and learning. As we enter the third school year affected by the pandemic—and
Content provided by Instructure
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Curriculum Webinar
How Data and Digital Curriculum Can Drive Personalized Instruction
As we return from an abnormal year, it’s an educator’s top priority to make sure the lessons learned under adversity positively impact students during the new school year. Digital curriculum has emerged from the pandemic
Content provided by Kiddom
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Equity & Diversity Webinar
Leadership for Racial Equity in Schools and Beyond
While the COVID-19 pandemic continues to reveal systemic racial disparities in educational opportunity, there are revelations to which we can and must respond. Through conscientious efforts, using an intentional focus on race, school leaders can
Content provided by Corwin

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Assessment Spotlight Spotlight on Assessment in 2021
In this Spotlight, review newest assessment scores, see how districts will catch up with their supports for disabled students, plus more.
Assessment 'Nation's Report Card' Has a New Reading Framework, After a Drawn-Out Battle Over Equity
The new framework for the National Assessment of Educational Progress will guide development of the 2026 reading test.
10 min read
results 925693186 02
iStock/Getty
Assessment Opinion Q&A Collections: Assessment
Scores of educators share commentaries on the use of assessments in schools.
5 min read
Images shows colorful speech bubbles that say "Q," "&," and "A."
iStock/Getty
Assessment Standardized Tests Could Be in Jeopardy in Wake of Biden Decisions, Experts Say
Has the Biden administration shored up statewide tests this year only to risk undermining long-term public backing for them?
6 min read
Image of a test sheet.
sengchoy/iStock/Getty