Law & Courts

Union Accuses Charter Operator of Skirting Ohio Law

March 14, 2006 4 min read

The Ohio Federation of Teachers, long a vocal critic of charter schools, issued a report last week that portrays one for-profit charter operator in the state as far more concerned about making money than improving student learning. It argues that the schools it operates are nothing more than a “chain of company stores” in violation of state law.

The analysis follows a series of reports that the Ohio affiliate of the American Federation of Teachers has written in recent years criticizing White Hat Management Inc. The privately held Akron-based company operates 34 charter schools serving some 16,000 students in Ohio, as well as 20 schools in other states with 6,000 students.

“This report shows clearly that [White Hat Chairman] David [L.] Brennan has been allowed to circumvent numerous state laws, and that profit, not helping children learn, is the primary motive,” said OFT President Tom Mooney in a March 7 statement.

“Education Empire: David Brennan’s White Hat Management Inc.” is published by the Ohio Federation of Teachers.

The 82-page report, jointly prepared by the OFT and the Food and Allied Service Trades Division of the AFL-CIO, outlines a long series of charges about the company and its chairman.

Thomas F. Needles, a White Hat consultant, said Mr. Mooney has long been unfairly savaging the company.

“The theme is just that … there’s some grand conspiracy by Mr. Brennan and White Hat to somehow bilk the taxpayers,” he said. “It’s a patently absurd charge and one we reject categorically.”

He added, “You have to understand that it’s a series of vicious professional and personal attacks that are also replete with errors, omissions, and outright lies.”

Mr. Needles declined to go into detail, and neither the company nor Mr. Brennan issued a formal response to the report.

‘Company Stores’

The report charges that schools run by White Hat are not truly independent from the company. For instance, the report says the same nine individuals constitute the boards of eight White Hat schools. In addition, four of those trustees also serve on the boards of five others.

The report suggests that many of those board members were handpicked by White Hat.

The report says the name of each school operated by White Hat is a trade name registered by White Hat Learning Systems. The company has established a limited-liability company under the name of each school, the report says.

White Hat is the “sole vendor” for its charter schools, renting them buildings, selling them computers, books, and other supplies, and leasing them teachers and administrative staff, the report says.

And it says that White Hat has loaned substantial sums to five of its charter schools. Public school districts may not carry operating debt beyond the current school year, the report notes.

“The ability of a charter school’s board of trustees to negotiate fair and equitable contracts for its school is further compromised when they are indebted to the management company that operates the school,” the report says.

In an interview, Mr. Mooney said all of this amounts to a violation of state law. “The law says that a charter school has to be nonprofit, and have its own board,” Mr. Mooney said in an interview. “This is illegal because this is a chain of company stores. … The schools are not just operated by White Hat, they are owned by White Hat. … The veil has been removed.”

J.C. Benton, a spokesman for the Ohio Department of Education, said he had not reviewed the report.

“The state does not have a direct relationship with White Hat Management,” he said. “White Hat handles the day-to-day operations of some schools in Ohio. I’m not going to defend David Brennan or White Hat Management. The sponsors of the schools have control and they use White Hat, which provides services.”

Terry Ryan, the vice president for Ohio programs and policy at the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation, a Washington think tank that backs charter schools, said the union report is part of an ongoing battle between the OFT and White Hat Management.

“The union is out to try to bring down charter schools by attaching them to David Brennan,” he said. “I think he does things that make him an easy target.”

Mr. Ryan said that while he found some of the charges questionable or even “loopy,” others appear to show reason for legitimate concern, such as questions about the independence of the boards for the schools. He emphasized that he had not independently researched that information.

Mr. Ryan noted that the Fordham Foundation serves as an authorizer of charter schools in Ohio. “And, as such, we think it’s important that there be a separation between the governing authority for the school and the management company that runs it,” he said.

He added: “The way that the White Hat schools have operated has alienated folks in local communities. … They’re seen as outsiders or carpetbaggers. It’s the perception that I hear from people.”

The report cites many other issues of concern, from campaign donations Mr. Brennan and his family members made to state lawmakers writing charter legislation to the use of charter school buildings as collateral to secure a loan for one of his companies.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the March 15, 2006 edition of Education Week as Union Accuses Charter Operator of Skirting Ohio Law


School & District Management Live Event Education Week Leadership Symposium
Education Week's Premier Leadership Event for K12 School & District Leaders.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Law & Courts Webinar
The Future of Criminal Justice Reform: A Sphere Education Initiative Conversation
America’s criminal justice system is in crisis and calls for reform are dominating the national debate. Join Cato’s Sphere Education Initiative and Education Week for a webinar on criminal justice and policing featuring the nation’s
Content provided by Cato Institute
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Student Well-Being Webinar
Equity, Care and Connection: New SEL Tools and Practices to Support Students and Adults
As school districts plan to welcome students back into buildings for the upcoming school year, this is the perfect time to take a hard look at both our practices and our systems to build a
Content provided by Panorama Education

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Appeals Court Weighs Idaho Law Barring Transgender Female Students From Girls' Sports
The three-judge federal court panel reviews a lower-court ruling that blocked the controversial statute and said it was likely unconstitutional.
4 min read
Image of a gavel.
Marilyn Nieves/E+
Law & Courts Federal Appeals Court Backs Socioeconomic-Based Admissions Plan for Boston 'Exam Schools'
The court denies an injunction to block the plan for next year and says considering family income in admissions is likely constitutional.
3 min read
Image shows lady justice standing before an open law book and gavel.
iStock/Getty Images Plus
Law & Courts U.S. Supreme Court Wary About Extending School Authority Over Student Internet Speech
In arguments, the justices looked for a narrow way to decide a case about the discipline of a cheerleader over a profane Snapchat message.
7 min read
Members of the Supreme Court pose for a group photo at the Supreme Court in Washington on April 23, 2021.
Members of the U.S. Supreme Court pose for a group photo at the court on April 23. The justices heard arguments Wednesday in a major case on student speech.
Erin Schaff/The New York Times via AP
Law & Courts Supreme Court to Weigh When School Board Censure of a Member Violates the First Amendment
The justices will decide an issue that has become more salient as a few board members rant inappropriately on social media.
5 min read
Image of the Supreme Court.