Law & Courts

Texas Poised to Close Long Chapter on School Aid

By David J. Hoff — May 23, 2006 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

After several failed attempts, Texas is about to get a new school finance system.

Gov. Rick Perry said last week that he would sign the package of tax and appropriations bills that the legislature passed to meet the state supreme court’s June 1 deadline to rewrite Texas’ property-tax code and still adequately finance schools.

The measures also contain a series of policy changes that include a boost in teacher pay and additional course requirements for high school graduation.

“Because of this plan,” Gov. Perry, a Republican who is seeking re-election in November, said in a May 16 statement, “our schools will improve, our economy will grow, and our state will prosper.”

Some legal advocates and finance experts doubt, however, that the plan is a long-term solution. They note that it relies on the state’s $8.2 billion surplus for short-term financing and doesn’t provide enough tax revenues to pay for schools in future years.

“This is yet another quick-fix,” said David Hinojosa, a staff lawyer for the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, one of the plaintiffs in the case arguing that the state inadequately finances its schools.

“They seem to be digging their own grave” for the future, he said, referring to the legislature.

Cuts and Increases

Working in response to last year’s Texas Supreme Court decision, the legislature convened last month in a special session to overhaul the school finance system.

In November, the court overturned a lower-court ruling that said the state inadequately financed its schools. But while the high court did not require the state to spend more on schools, it did order a revision of the tax system, which caps the amount districts can assess when taxing property and requires wealthy districts to share a portion of their revenues with poor districts.

The court ruled that the property-tax cap amounted to a statewide property tax—something the Texas Constitution prohibits. (“Texas School Finance Ruling Draws National Attention,” Dec. 7, 2005.)

Lawmakers had failed in their efforts to revise the finance program in their regular 2005 session and two special sessions last year, and in a special session in 2004.

But the task was made easier this year by a projected $8.2 billion surplus in the $72 billion budget for fiscal years 2006 and 2007.

The series of bills the legislature sent Gov. Perry last week would cut property taxes, close loopholes in a business tax, and raise cigarette taxes. At the same time, the package would increase K-12 spending by $1.8 billion in the next school year—about a 5 percent increase—with most of the money going toward a $2,000 teacher-pay raise and Mr. Perry’s plan to improve high schools.

In his statement, Mr. Perry said that, under the proposal, property-tax payers would save $15.7 billion over the next three years.

Under the revisions to the way property-tax revenues have been shared, $1 billion in tax revenues would stay in local communities rather than be redistributed across the state through what is known as the “Robin Hood” system.

Policy Changes

The bills would also make some significant policy changes.

They would create a $260 million pool to pay teachers bonuses based on their students’ achievement gains. The bonuses, worth as much as $10,000 each, would be distributed based on rules devised by local school districts. A mentoring program to help new teachers adjust to their jobs would also be started.

In addition, future students would be required to take four years of mathematics and four years of science to earn their diplomas. For a regular diploma, the state now requires three years of each subject.

While the governor and his allies bragged about their accomplishments last week, his opponents warned that the tax bills wouldn’t generate enough revenue to pay for all of the proposed K-12 programs.

Texas Comptroller Carole Keeton Strayhorn, an Independent candidate in this year’s gubernatorial election, estimates that the bills would fall $23 billion short of the revenue needed to pay for the bills’ programs over the next five years. The plan would use all of the state’s projected surplus to pay for the school finance program, she said in a letter to Gov. Perry.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the May 24, 2006 edition of Education Week as Texas Poised to Close Long Chapter on School Aid

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Artificial Intelligence Webinar
Managing AI in Schools: Practical Strategies for Districts
How should districts govern AI in schools? Learn practical strategies for policies, safety, transparency, as well as responsible adoption.
Content provided by Lightspeed Systems
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
Unlocking Success for Struggling Adolescent Readers
The Science of Reading transformed K-3 literacy. Now it's time to extend that focus to students in grades 6 through 12.
Content provided by STARI
Jobs Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and K-12 education jubs at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Supreme Court Strikes Trump Tariffs in Case Brought by Educational Toy Companies
Two educational toy companies were among the leading challengers to the president's tariff policies
3 min read
Members of the Supreme Court sit for a new group portrait following the addition of Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, at the Supreme Court building in Washington, Oct. 7, 2022. Bottom row, from left, Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice of the United States John Roberts, Associate Justice Samuel Alito, and Associate Justice Elena Kagan. Top row, from left, Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch, Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh, and Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson.
Members of the U.S. Supreme Court sit for a new group portrait following the addition of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, at the court building in Washington, Oct. 7, 2022. On Feb. 20, 2026, the court ruled 6-3 to strike down President Donald Trump's broad tariff policies, ruling that they were not authorized by the federal statute that he cited for them.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
Law & Courts California Sues Ed. Dept. in Clash Over Gender Disclosures to Parents
California challenges U.S. Department of Education findings on state policies over gender disclosure.
4 min read
California Attorney General Rob Bonta speaks to reporters as Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes, left, and Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield, right, listen outside the Supreme Court on Wednesday, Nov. 5, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)
California Attorney General Rob Bonta speaks to reporters outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington on Nov. 5, 2025, with Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes and Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield behind him. Bonta this week sued the U.S. Department of Education, asking a court to block the agency's finding that the state is violating FERPA by <ins data-user-label="Matt Stone" data-time="02/13/2026 4:22:45 PM" data-user-id="00000185-c5a3-d6ff-a38d-d7a32f6d0001" data-target-id="">not requiring schools to disclose</ins> students’ gender transitions <ins data-user-label="Matt Stone" data-time="02/13/2026 4:22:45 PM" data-user-id="00000185-c5a3-d6ff-a38d-d7a32f6d0001" data-target-id="">to</ins> parents.
Mark Schiefelbein/AP
Law & Courts Oklahoma Board Rejects Jewish Charter as Supreme Court Fight Looms
Oklahoma's charter school board rejected the Jewish school as members said their hands were tied.
4 min read
Ben Gamla Charter Schools founder and former U.S. Rep. Peter Deutsch, right, speaks with Brett Farley, executive director of the Catholic Conference of Oklahoma, left, before a Jan. 12 meeting of the Statewide Charter School Board in Oklahoma City. Both are founding board members of an Oklahoma Jewish Charter School.
Ben Gamla Charter Schools founder and former U.S. Rep. Peter Deutsch, right, speaks with Brett Farley, executive director of the Catholic Conference of Oklahoma, before a Jan. 12, 2026, meeting of the Statewide Charter School Board in Oklahoma City. The board rejected the proposed Jewish charter school on Feb. 9, 2026.
Nuria Martinez-Keel/Oklahoma Voice
Law & Courts Religious Charter Schools Push New Cases Toward Supreme Court
Advocates seeking to establish publicly funded religious schools in three states.
9 min read
The U.S. Supreme Court is seen, Wednesday, Jan. 14, 2026, in Washington.
The U.S. Supreme Court is seen on Wednesday, Jan. 14, 2026, in Washington. Religious charter advocates are betting a full Supreme Court will side with their efforts to establish religious charter schools.
Rahmat Gul/AP