Law & Courts

Southern Baptists Urge School Board Activism, Off-Campus Bible Study

By Jessica L. Tonn — June 16, 2006 | Corrected: February 22, 2019 3 min read

Corrected: This story originally misstated the headquarters of the Southern Baptist Convention. It is based in Nashville, Tenn.

The Southern Baptist Convention has again sidestepped a controversial proposal urging its members to pull their children from public schools, but overwhelmingly adopted two milder resolutions relating to public education in the final hours of its annual meeting.

The first of those calls on school boards to adopt policies that would allow students to leave school for Bible classes during the school day.

In the other resolution, the gathering targeted “the direction of the public school system” by urging Southern Baptist churches nationwide to solicit members to run for school board seats and exert “their godly influence” on school districts.

Resolutions adopted by the group serve as recommendations and are nonbinding. About 12,000 Southern Baptists attended the meeting, which was held June 13-14 in Greensboro, N.C.

Kenyn M. Cureton, a spokesman for the Nashville, Tenn.-based SBC, referred to the two resolutions on schools as “engagement strategies” for addressing public education.

For the third consecutive year, the group’s resolution committee declined to send to the full gathering a more drastic “exit strategy” calling for the withdrawal of Southern Baptist children from public schools, he said. (“Southern Baptists Decline to Take Up Call for Public School Exodus,” June 23, 2004.)

The Southern Baptist Convention, with 16 million members, is the nation’s largest Baptist body. Though concentrated in the South, it has a presence throughout the United States.

Constitutional Rights

The two education resolutions approved on June 14 point to the constitutional rights of the group’s members as both a reason and a means for change.

According to the first resolution, “some states and school districts do not recognize and accommodate those parents who desire their children to participate in off-campus biblical instruction.”

The document notes that the U.S. Supreme Court, in its 1952 decision in Zorach v. Clauson, ruled that releasing students from school to attend religious classes is constitutional. Just four years earlier, in McCollum v. Board of Education, the high court had struck down an Illinois district’s release-time plan, in which children took religion classes at their schools during the school day.

Despite the Zorach ruling, a spokesman for a leading advocacy group for strict separation of church and state said he doubts school districts will be quick to embrace the release-time policies urged by the Southern Baptists.

Robert Boston of the Washington-based Americans United for Separation of Church and State said that “the social and academic atmosphere is different now.” He speculated that if the Zorach case had come up even a decade later, in the 1960s, the practice of release time might not have passed muster with the Supreme Court.

Some districts, already have policies providing for the release of students for religious study, Mr. Boston said. But, he added, most districts are reluctant to approve such policies because they would cut into instructional time and would pose logistical problems, such as what to do with the students who do not leave school.

“The Baptists are barking up the wrong tree,” he said.

‘Wishful Thinking’

In encouraging Southern Baptists to run for school board seats, the other resolution refers to the high-profile battle over the Dover, Pa., school board’s policy that called for citing “intelligent design” as an alternative to the theory of evolution in biology class. That policy was overturned in a federal court case last year.

“In December 2005, a federal judge ruled in favor of government schools indoctrinating children with dogmatic Darwinism,” the resolution says.

The resolution also argues that schools continue to adopt “policies teaching that the homosexual lifestyle is acceptable.”

The Dover controversy could serve as a warning, rather than a call to action, for prospective school board members, however

Mr. Boston noted that local residents had voted out of office all eight board members who had voiced support for the policy on exposure to intelligent design—the belief that life on Earth is so complex that a divine hand must have played a role in its creation—after drawing intense criticism and media scrutiny to the 3,600-student district. (“Evolution Loses and Wins, All in One Day,” Nov. 16, 2005.)

Bruce N. Shortt, the Houston lawyer who co-sponsored the proposed exit-strategy resolution also questions the strategy behind the education resolutions. He said the effort they envision “reflects reformist wishful thinking.”

The education system is “unreformable,” he contended, because of government-mandated school curricula, court rulings, and special-interest groups.

His solution: “We need to send our adults in and take our children out.”

A version of this article appeared in the June 21, 2006 edition of Education Week as Southern Baptists Urge School Board Activism, Off-Campus Bible Study


This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Mathematics Webinar
Building Equitable Systems: Moving Math From Gatekeeper to Opportunity Gateway
The importance of disrupting traditional American math practices and adopting high-quality math curriculum continues to be essential for changing the trajectory of historically under-resourced schools. Building systems around high-quality math curriculum also is necessary to
Content provided by Partnership for L.A. Schools
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Student Well-Being Webinar
Measuring & Supporting Student Well-Being: A Researcher and District Leader Roundtable
Students’ social-emotional well-being matters. The positive and negative emotions students feel are essential characteristics of their psychology, indicators of their well-being, and mediators of their success in school and life. Supportive relationships with peers, school
Content provided by Panorama Education
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
School & District Management Webinar
Making Digital Literacy a Priority: An Administrator’s Perspective
Join us as we delve into the efforts of our panelists and their initiatives to make digital skills a “must have” for their district. We’ll discuss with district leadership how they have kept digital literacy
Content provided by

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts How a Cheerleader's Snapchat Profanity Could Shape the Limits of Students' Free Speech
Brandi Levy's social media post is the basis for a case before the U.S. Supreme Court on whether schools may punish off-campus speech.
9 min read
Image of Brandi Levy.
Brandi Levy, now an 18-year-old college freshman, was a cheerleader at Mahanoy Area High School in Pennsylvania when she made profane comments on Snapchat that are now at the center of a U.S. Supreme Court case on student speech rights.
Danna Singer/Provided by the American Civil Liberties Union
Law & Courts Student School Board Members Flex Their Civic Muscle in Supreme Court Free-Speech Case
Current and former student school board members add their growing voices to a potentially precedent-setting U.S. Supreme Court case.
7 min read
Image of the Supreme Court.
Law & Courts Justice Department Memo Could Stoke State-Federal Fights Over Transgender Students' Rights
Title IX prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity in schools, a Justice Department memo says.
3 min read
Stephanie Marty demonstrates against a proposed ban on transgender girls and women from female sports leagues outside the South Dakota governor's mansion in Pierre, S.D. on March 11, 2021.
Stephanie Marty demonstrates against a proposed ban on allowing transgender girls and women to play in female sports leagues outside the South Dakota governor's mansion in Pierre, S.D.
Stephen Groves/AP
Law & Courts Diverse Array of Groups Back Student in Supreme Court Case on Off-Campus Speech
John and Mary Beth Tinker, central to the landmark speech case that bears their name, argue that even offensive speech merits protection.
5 min read
In this photo taken Tuesday, Aug. 27, 2013, Mary Beth Tinker, 61, shows an old photograph of her with her brother John Tinker to the Associated Press during an interview in Washington. Tinker was just 13 when she spoke out against the Vietnam War by wearing a black armband to her Iowa school in 1965. When the school suspended her, she took her free speech case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court and won. Her message: Students should take action on issues important to them. "It's better for our whole society when kids have a voice," she says.
In this 2013 photo, Mary Beth Tinker shows a 1968 Associated Press photograph of her with her brother John Tinker displaying the armbands they had worn in school to protest the Vietnam War. (The peace symbols were added after the school protest). The Tinkers have filed a brief in the U.S. Supreme Court supporting a Pennsylvania student who was disciplined for an offensive message on Snapchat.
Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP