Federal

Senate Panel OKs Small Spending Increase

By Michelle R. Davis — July 26, 2005 5 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The two largest federal programs for K-12 education would see an end to the significant increases they have received in recent years, under a spending bill approved by the Senate Appropriations Committee for the 2006 fiscal year.

The committee on July 14 approved $56.7 billion in discretionary spending for the Department of Education for the budget year that begins Oct. 1. The bill, approved 27-0, would provide the department with an increase of $143 million, or just 0.25 percent, over the current year.

While the Senate committee’s bill would restore funding for a host of programs President Bush proposed for elimination in his budget proposal, both the Title I program for disadvantaged students and funding for the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act would see only modest increases of $100 million each, less than a 1 percent increase per program.

“When I talk about discretionary spending, I talk about a concept of the past,” said Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., the chairman of the Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies. “Today, all we look at is how far from the bone we are.”

The Senate committee also largely rejected the wishes of President Bush, who proposed in his budget to eliminate funding for 48 programs and add funding for certain new initiatives.

The committee’s proposed increase to $12.8 billion for Title I would be the smallest in eight years. The increase to $10.7 billion for special education would mark the first time in a decade that the federal share of spending for special education would drop, going from 18.6 percent of the excess costs of educating students with disabilities this year to 18 percent in 2006. Funding for those items—$13.3 billion for Title I and $12.1 billion for the IDEA—also would come in well below the amounts proposed by the president.

Technology Aid Survives

“For the first time in 10 years, the federal government will slide backward on its commitment to students with disabilities,” said Sen. Tom Harkin of Iowa, the ranking Democrat on the education appropriations subcommittee. “I’m very concerned once again that many schools around the country … will lose Title I funding in FY 2006 at the very time that the No Child Left Behind Act is holding them to higher and higher standards.”

But holding a strict line on K-12 education’s largest programs gave Senate appropriators room to add spending elsewhere.

The bill making its way through the Senate would provide $1.3 billion for vocational and technical education, essentially keeping funding levels the same as this year’s appropriation. The Senate bill would also finance a handful of other programs proposed for scrapping in Mr. Bush’s budget, including:

  • $306.5 million for GEAR UP and $837 million for TRIO, both programs to help students from disadvantaged families pursue higher education;
  • $35.7 million for arts in education; and
  • $11 million for the Javits Gifted and Talented Education program.
  • The programs would be funded at similar levels as this year.

    The Appropriations Committee’s bill would also provide $425 million to the Enhancing Education Through Technology program, which helps boost students’ and teachers’ technology skills.

    That amount, or the $300 million proposed by the House, which passed its education appropriations bill on June 24, would save the program Mr. Bush wants to eliminate, following a 27 percent cut to the program in 2005. Those setbacks shocked into action a coalition of education groups that lobbied for school technology for many years, but let its guard down in 2004.

    “We learned not to assume victory until you have it,” said Don Knezek, the executive director of the International Society for Technology in Education, in Eugene, Ore.

    Mary Kusler, a senior legislative specialist for the American Association of School Administrators, said that while she was pleased the Senate proposal would restore funding for some programs “the spreading-out of money essentially ends up hurting programs rather than helping,” she said.

    “The federal formula programs benefit all districts, and yet those are the ones being cut or receiving dismal increases,” she said.

    Some programs would take a significant hit under the Senate committee’s bill, including the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities program, which would face a cut of $137 million, or 31 percent, from this year’s appropriation of $437 million.

    The Senate Appropriations Committee, like its counterpart in the House, also ignored President Bush’s request for $1.2 billion in new money for his high school initiative, which would bolster teacher training and learning plans for incoming 9th graders, among other goals, and $250 million for expanded high school testing. Unlike the House, which proposes $100 million for the president’s Teacher Incentive Fund, the Senate bill does not provide any money for it.

    Reading First

    The president got only a slight nod from the Senate committee when it came to reading. Mr. Bush had requested $200 million for his Striving Readers program. The House would provide $30 million, while the Senate bill would provide $35 million.

    Money for Reading First—the main federal initiative in the subject—would stay flat under both the House and the Senate proposals, at just over $1 billion.

    The Senate bill includes language addressing persistent complaints that the Reading First program has gone too far in restricting the selection of reading materials for participating schools. The Baltimore-based Success for All Foundation, for example, filed a complaint with the Education Department’s inspector general, citing pressure some schools said they felt to discontinue the curriculum in order to win Reading First funds. (“Complaint Filed Against Reading Initiative,” June 22, 2005.)

    The bill directs the Education Department to provide clear guidance to Reading First Technical Assistance Centers and to states that there is no “approved” list of programs for grant recipients, and that decisions on reading materials are to be made at the school level, subject to state approval.

    Associate Editor Kathleen Kennedy Manzo and Staff Writer Andrew Trotter contributed to this report.

    Events

    This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
    Sponsor
    Assessment Webinar
    Measuring What Matters: How District Leaders Are Redefining Student Assessment
    In this panel discussion, district leaders and systems experts will examine the gap between the outcomes we want and the systems in place.
    Content provided by Otus
    Early Childhood Webinar Selling Into Early Learning: New Survey Data and Strategies for Marketers
    Selling into PreK? Get fresh EdWeek Research Center data and strategies to position your products and reach the right early learning buyers.
    Artificial Intelligence Webinar AI and 'Techlash' Are on a Collision Course. How Should Schools Respond?
    Learn what strategies and tactics schools can develop to encourage smart and responsible AI use, while also enforcing tech guardrails.

    EdWeek Top School Jobs

    Teacher Jobs
    Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
    View Jobs
    Principal Jobs
    Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
    View Jobs
    Administrator Jobs
    Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
    View Jobs
    Support Staff Jobs
    Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
    View Jobs

    Read Next

    Federal Opinion Margaret Spellings and Arne Duncan: The Ed. Agenda We Can Agree On
    We need to get education back on track, write the former Ed. Secretaries. Let’s start at the top.
    Margaret Spellings & Arne Duncan
    •
    5 min read
    Government research, State budgets, public education, back on track, Education Agenda
    Vanessa Solis/Education Week + Getty
    Federal Q&A A Top Democrat Breaks Down His Party's Plans for K-12 in a House Majority
    If Democrats retake the House, Rep. Bobby Scott may be in a position to set his chamber’s K-12 agenda.
    5 min read
    Rep. Bobby Scott, D-Va., speaks during a prayer vigil held by the Chesapeake Coalition of Black Pastors at The Mount (Mount Lebanon Baptist Church) in Chesapeake, Va., Sunday, Nov. 27, 2022, for the six people killed at a Walmart in Chesapeake, Va., when a manager opened fire with a handgun before an employee meeting Tuesday night.
    Rep. Bobby Scott, D-Va., speaks during a prayer vigil in Chesapeake, Va., on Nov. 27, 2022. Scott is the ranking Democrat on the U.S. House of Representatives' education committee and will seek the panel's chairmanship if Democrats win a House majority in next month's elections.
    Carolyn Kaster/AP
    Federal What a Democratic Congress Could Mean for Trump's K-12 Agenda
    They may try to reverse—or at least investigate—the Trump admin.'s efforts to dismantle the Ed. Dept.
    9 min read
    House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., the top Democrat in the Republican-majority House, is joined by Rep. Pete Aguilar, D-Calif., chair of the House Democratic Caucus, as they criticize President Donald Trump and his policies while talking to reporters about the approaching midterm election, at the Capitol in Washington, Thursday, Sept. 17, 2026.
    House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries speaks at the U.S. Capitol on Sept. 17, 2026. He's joined by Rep. Pete Aguilar, D-Calif., who chairs the House Democratic Caucus. If Democrats gain a majority of either chamber of Congress after next month's elections, they'll be able to hold oversight hearings on and launch investigations into the dismantling of the U.S. Department of Education.
    J. Scott Applewhite/AP
    Federal The Future of Education Research: More Partisan and Largely Left to States?
    As Trump administration works to change federal grants, outside researchers try to regroup.
    6 min read
    Image of file folders with tabs called "funding" "grants" "projects" and a blank note paper paperclipped to the outside.
    Collage by Laura Baker/Education Week + Getty