Law & Courts News in Brief

Indiana Supreme Court Upholds Voucher Law

By Alyssa Morones — April 03, 2013 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

The Indiana Supreme Court last week unanimously upheld the state law that created Indiana’s school voucher program, the Associated Press reported.

The Indiana state government enacted its Choice Scholarship program during the 2011 legislative session. It is the only voucher program in the country that is not limited to low-income students or students who attend low-performing schools. It also has no enrollment cap. More than 9,000 students participated in the program this year.

Indiana students are eligible for vouchers that cover either 90 percent or 50 percent of private school tuition costs—depending on income and the number of household members—with the cap at $4,500 annually.

The legal battle began soon after the program’s enactment. In its suit in the Marion Superior Court, the Indiana State Teachers Association said that the program drained money from public schools and argued that vouchers redirect those funds to schools whose primary purpose is to promote religious teachings. Marion Superior Court Judge Michael Keele upheld the legislation in 2011 and rejected claims of constitutional violation.

In its 5-0 opinion, the state supreme court affirmed that ruling. It said that the law does not violate the Indiana Constitution’s guarantee of religious freedom, nor does it violate a ban on using state funds for religious institutions. Rather, the primary benefits of the program went to parents by giving them a choice in their children’s education, the court said. While the state is not permitted to directly spend money on religious institutions, those institutions are not prohibited from receiving indirect government services, according to the court.

The ruling also clears the way for expanding the voucher program. Earlier this year, Indiana lawmakers introduced a bill that would waive the requirement that all students attend at least one year of public school before they are eligible for vouchers. Kindergartners and voucher students’ siblings would also be immediately eligible.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the April 03, 2013 edition of Education Week as Indiana Supreme Court Upholds Voucher Law

Events

School Climate & Safety K-12 Essentials Forum Strengthen Students’ Connections to School
Join this free event to learn how schools are creating the space for students to form strong bonds with each other and trusted adults.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Mathematics Webinar
Math for All: Strategies for Inclusive Instruction and Student Success
Looking for ways to make math matter for all your students? Gain strategies that help them make the connection as well as the grade.
Content provided by NMSI
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Mathematics Webinar
Equity and Access in Mathematics Education: A Deeper Look
Explore the advantages of access in math education, including engagement, improved learning outcomes, and equity.
Content provided by MIND Education

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Supreme Court Declines to Hear School District's Transgender Restroom Case
The case asked whether federal law protects transgender students on the use of school facilities that correspond to their gender identity.
4 min read
People stand on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court on Feb. 11, 2022, in Washington, D.C.
People stand on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court on Feb. 11, 2022, in Washington, D.C.
Mariam Zuhaib/AP
Law & Courts What a Proposed Ban on AI-Assisted ‘Deep Fakes’ Would Mean for Cyberbullying
Students who create AI-generated, intimate images of their classmates would be breaking federal law, if a new bill is enacted.
2 min read
AI Education concept in blue: A robot hand holding a pencil.
iStock/Getty
Law & Courts Supreme Court Declines Case on Corporal Punishment for Student With Autism
The justices refused to hear the appeal of an 11-year-old Louisiana student who alleges that two educators slapped her on her wrists.
3 min read
The Supreme Court building is seen on Capitol Hill in Washington, Jan. 10, 2023.
The Supreme Court building is seen on Capitol Hill in Washington, Jan. 10, 2023.
Patrick Semansky/AP
Law & Courts U.S. Supreme Court Declines Bid to Rename 'Brown v. Board of Education'
Descendants argued that their case, not the one from Topeka, Kan., should have topped the 1954 decision on racial segregation in schools.
3 min read
Linda Brown Smith stands in front of the Sumner School in Topeka, Kan., on May 8, 1964. The refusal of the public school to admit Brown in 1951, then nine years old, because she is black, led to the Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas. In 1954, the U.S. Supreme Court overruled the "separate but equal" clause and mandated that schools nationwide must be desegregated.
Linda Brown Smith stands in front of the Sumner School in Topeka, Kan., in 1964, a segregated white school where she had been denied enrollment in 1951, leading to the landmark 1954 U.S. Supreme Court decision striking down the "separate but equal" doctrine in the case that bears her family name, <i>Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka.</i> The high court on Jan. 8 turned away an effort by descendants of the litigants in a companion desegregation case from South Carolina to rename the historic decision for their case, <i>Briggs</i> v. <i>Elliott</i>.
AP