Your Education Road Map

Politics K-12®

ESSA. Congress. State chiefs. School spending. Elections. Education Week reporters keep watch on education policy and politics in the nation’s capital and in the states. Read more from this blog.


House Democrats Plan to Offer Their Own NCLB Rewrite

By Lauren Camera — February 10, 2015 2 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

House Democrats will try—though likely fail—to replace a rewrite of the No Child Left Behind Act that the House education committee is marking up Wednesday with a version of their own that includes early education.

The measure, which will be offered as a substitute amendment, is a complete departure from the bill Republicans are slated to clear through committee Wednesday and then through the full House the last week in February.

Notably, the Democratic proposal would create a new title for early-childhood education that would provide funding through a formula to states willing to match the amount. The federal dollars would be targeted to 4-year-olds from families earning below 200 percent of the federal poverty level.

The proposal is essentially dead on arrival, but there are a few tidbits worth pointing out. In relation to the Republican bill, the Democratic substitute would:

  • Keep an annual testing requirement, but allow states to eliminate low-quality tests;
  • Require assessments to be based on student growth, not proficiency;
  • Require states to establish accountability systems that set performance, growth, and graduation targets for all students, including subgroups of students;
  • Eliminate the Title I portability language;
  • Alter the Title I formula to include actual teacher salaries in state aid calculations;
  • Restore maintenance of effort (which requires school districts and states to keep up their own spending at a certain level in order to tap federal dollars);
  • Restore “High Quality Teachers” (which means they must show they are competent in the subject they are teaching, hold a bachelor’s degree, and be certified in their states);
  • Require states to address equitable distribution of high-quality teachers;
  • Restore separate streams of funding for migrant students, neglected and delinquent students, English-learners, and rural students;
  • Revise Title IV for out of school programs and expanded learning time programs that put a priority on low-performing and low-income schools;
  • Prevent schools from using restraint and seclusion as forms of punishment;
  • Set minimum standards for concussion safety;
  • Require criminal and child-abuse background checks of all school employees.

Why bother reading a Democratic substitute amendment that’s just going to get shot down? You never know when the electoral landscape will change, so it’s worth taking a look at what Democratic leaders would do on K-12 if they had their way.

You can read more about the measure here: