Law & Courts

Florida Can Recover Money From Funds for Girl Who Was Hurt After Exiting School Bus

By Mark Walsh — June 06, 2022 2 min read
Photo shows a summer day in front of the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, DC.
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

In a case involving a Florida student hit by a truck after stepping off her school bus, leaving her in a vegetative state, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday ruled that federal Medicaid law allows a state to seek reimbursement from a settlement the student’s parents reached with the school board and other defendants.

The justices ruled 7-2 against Gianinna Gallardo, who was 13 years old in 2008 when she exited her school bus and was struck by a pickup truck. She has been on life support ever since. Her parents sued the Lee County, Fla., school district as well as the truck’s owner and the driver.

The parties reached a settlement of $800,000 in 2015, even though her suit sought as much as $20 million in damages for past and future medical expenses and future earnings.

Florida’s Medicaid program, which was not a party to the settlement, paid some $862,000 for Gallardo’s medical care. The state placed a lien on the settlement, and under Florida law, it was entitled to recover 37.5 percent of the amount for medical expenses, or about $300,000 of the settlement amount.

Gallardo’s family challenged Florida’s actions in federal court, arguing that the state was entitled to reimbursement for only a relatively small amount—$35,000—from the settlement that covered the girl’s past medical expenses.

A federal district court ruled for the family. But the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, in Atlanta, ruled for the state, holding that the federal Medicaid Act permits state programs to seek reimbursement of third-party payments for both past and future medical expenses. The Florida Supreme Court, in a separate case, had reached the opposite conclusion.

The U.S. Supreme Court, in its June 6 decision in Gallardo v. Marstiller, affirmed the 11th Circuit court and ruled for Florida.

In a dry opinion for the majority, Justice Clarence Thomas said that “Medicaid requires participating states to pay for certain needy individuals’ medical costs and then to make reasonable efforts to recoup those costs from liable third parties.”

Under a plain reading of federal Medicaid law, he said, “Florida may seek reimbursement from settlement amounts representing ‘payment for medical care,’ past or future.”

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justices Samuel A. Alito Jr., Elena Kagan, Neil M. Gorsuch, Brett M. Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett joined Thomas’s opinion.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, in a dissent joined by Justice Stephen G. Breyer, said the majority read one Medicaid Act provision in isolation and gave “short shrift” to a larger context of the statute.

“The court’s holding is inconsistent with the structure of the Medicaid program and will cause needless unfairness and disruption,” Sotomayor said.

She noted that Gallardo “has continued to receive Medicaid benefits, despite the proceeds from her tort settlement, because those proceeds were transferred into a congressionally authorized Special Needs Trust, a narrow exception to Medicaid’s asset limits.”

The majority decision undercuts Congress’s choice to allow such special needs trusts, Sotomayor said, and lawmakers may need to act to prevent any “disruption” to that option.

Events

Jobs Virtual Career Fair for Teachers and K-12 Staff
Find teaching jobs and other jobs in K-12 education at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
Science of Reading: Emphasis on Language Comprehension
Dive into language comprehension through a breakdown of the Science of Reading with an interactive demonstration.
Content provided by Be GLAD
English-Language Learners Webinar English Learners and the Science of Reading: What Works in the Classroom
ELs & emergent bilinguals deserve the best reading instruction! The Reading League & NCEL join forces on best practices. Learn more in our webinar with both organizations.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts School District Lawsuits Against Social Media Companies Are Piling Up
More than 200 school districts are now suing the major social media companies over the youth mental health crisis.
7 min read
A close up of a statue of the blindfolded lady justice against a light blue background with a ghosted image of a hands holding a cellphone with Facebook "Like" and "Love" icons hovering above it.
iStock/Getty
Law & Courts In 1974, the Supreme Court Recognized English Learners' Rights. The Story Behind That Case
The Lau v. Nichols ruling said students have a right to a "meaningful opportunity" to participate in school, but its legacy is complex.
12 min read
Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court William O. Douglas is shown in an undated photo.
U.S. Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas, shown in an undated photo, wrote the opinion in <i>Lau</i> v. <i>Nichols</i>, the 1974 decision holding that the San Francisco school system had denied Chinese-speaking schoolchildren a meaningful opportunity to participate in their education.
AP
Law & Courts Supreme Court Declines to Hear School District's Transgender Restroom Case
The case asked whether federal law protects transgender students on the use of school facilities that correspond to their gender identity.
4 min read
People stand on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court on Feb. 11, 2022, in Washington, D.C.
People stand on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court on Feb. 11, 2022, in Washington, D.C.
Mariam Zuhaib/AP
Law & Courts What a Proposed Ban on AI-Assisted ‘Deep Fakes’ Would Mean for Cyberbullying
Students who create AI-generated, intimate images of their classmates would be breaking federal law, if a new bill is enacted.
2 min read
AI Education concept in blue: A robot hand holding a pencil.
iStock/Getty