Law & Courts

First Amendment Attitudes Found Troubling

By Jessica L. Tonn — February 01, 2005 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

A majority of high school students are apathetic toward, and ignorant of, Americans’ First Amendment rights, concludes a study being released this week that surveyed 112,000 students at 544 public and private high schools nationwide.

The report—commissioned by the Miami-based John S. and James L. Knight Foundation—also surveyed nearly 8,000 teachers and more than 500 principals.

It found that nearly three-fourths of the students either do not know how they feel about the First Amendment or admit that they take it for granted. In addition, 75 percent of those surveyed erroneously think flag burning is illegal, half believe the government can censor the Internet, and more than a third think the First Amendment goes too far in the rights it guarantees.

The report, “The Future of the First Amendment,” is available online from the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation. () See also the Future of the First Amendment site.

Some of the results for teachers and administrators were similarly troubling.

For instance, only 50 percent of teachers said they personally think about their First Amendment rights, while 46 percent said they take those rights for granted. Fifty-six percent of principals reported personally thinking about those rights, while 43 percent acknowledged taking them for granted.

‘Dangerous’ Results

Hodding Carter III, the Knight Foundation’s president and chief executive officer, expressed deep concern. “These results are not only disturbing; they are dangerous,” he said in a statement. “Ignorance about the basics of this free society is a danger to our nation’s future.”

Some educators also were troubled, but not surprised, by the findings.

“The statistics are pretty close to being correct,” said Cricket F.L. Kidwell, the director of curriculum for 11 school districts in Trinity County, Calif. She said the survey confirmed the “deplorable situation” of civic education.

In Ms. Kidwell’s opinion, time constraints imposed by testing systems prevent teachers from adequately discussing constitutional rights with their students. Teachers who must adhere to strict standards so their students will pass state tests only have time to relay specific content information, she said, not broad political concepts.

Civic education could be improved, she added, if teachers were better able to hold classroom discussions on current events, pose insightful questions, and provide their students with more opportunities to use analytical skills.

Marcie Taylor-Thoma, the social studies coordinator for the state of Maryland, pointed out that adults, including teachers and administrators, are “just as confused” about their First Amendment rights as students, and that may be part of the problem.

But she says her state is trying to fill that gap—at least for this generation of students.

Last year, 66 percent of Maryland public high school students passed the state’s high school assessment in government, which measures students’ understanding of U.S. government laws and principles.

In Maryland, high school students must take a government course, as required by state curriculum standards.

Practice in Schools

Charles C. Haynes, a senior scholar at the Arlington, Va., office of the Nashville, Tenn.-based First Amendment Center, a nonprofit organization that advocates protection of First Amendment rights, argues that students’ misinterpretation of and lack of interest in their First Amendment rights result not only from poor classroom instruction, but also from the “prison-like environment” of schools.

“We have to improve not only how we teach the First Amendment, but how we practice it in schools,” he said.

Schools must “model the freedoms they teach,” Mr. Haynes said, by improving their student governments, protecting religious-liberty rights, encouraging freedom of expression, promoting academic freedom, and supporting the student press.

Mr. Haynes bemoaned the elimination of journalism programs in some schools and said that students involved in such programs tend to have a better understanding of their constitutional rights.

The Knight Foundation report found that among students who were involved in three or more journalism-related activities, 39 percent believe that Americans should have the legal right to burn the flag as a means of protest. Only 15 percent of students not involved in such activities agreed.

“The key [to improving civic education],” Mr. Haynes said, “is to give people the ability to practice their rights.”

A version of this article appeared in the February 02, 2005 edition of Education Week as First Amendment Attitudes Found Troubling

Events

School & District Management Webinar Squeeze More Learning Time Out of the School Day
Learn how to increase learning time for your students by identifying and minimizing classroom disruptions.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Reading & Literacy Webinar
Improve Reading Comprehension: Three Tools for Working Memory Challenges
Discover three working memory workarounds to help your students improve reading comprehension and empower them on their reading journey.
Content provided by Solution Tree
Recruitment & Retention Webinar EdRecruiter 2026 Survey Results: How School Districts are Finding and Keeping Talent
Discover the latest K-12 hiring trends from EdWeek’s nationwide survey of job seekers and district HR professionals.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts How One Lawyer Helped Reshape Special Education at the Supreme Court
A documentary follows a lawyer behind major Supreme Court wins for students with disabilities.
9 min read
Roman Martinez, an attorney with Latham & Watkins, is featured in the Bloomberg Law documentary 'Supreme Advocacy.'
Roman Martinez, a Washington lawyer who has played a role in four U.S. Supreme Court cases about the rights of special education students, is featured in the Bloomberg Law documentary "Supreme Advocacy."
via YouTube
Law & Courts Supreme Court Weighs IQ Tests and Other School Records in Key Death Penalty Case
The court weighs the proper role of IQ tests for defendants claiming an intellectual disability.
8 min read
IQ test, paper sheet with test answer on the table
iStock/Getty
Law & Courts Supreme Court Orders New Review of Religious Exemptions to School Vaccines
The U.S. Supreme Court ordered a new look in a school vaccination case and declined to review library book removals.
6 min read
A U.S. Supreme Court police officer walks in front of the Supreme Court amid renovations as the justices hear oral arguments on President Donald Trump's push to expand control over independent federal agencies in Washington, D.C., on Dec. 8, 2025.
A U.S. Supreme Court police officer walks in front of the court amid renovations in Washington, on Dec. 8, 2025. The court took several actions in education cases, including ordering a lower court to take a fresh look at a lawsuit challenging a New York state law that ended religious exemptions to school vaccinations.
J. Scott Applewhite/AP
Law & Courts Supreme Court to Weigh Birthright Citizenship. Why It Matters to Schools
The justices will review President Trump's bid to end birthright citizenship, a move that could affect schools.
4 min read
President Donald Trump signs an executive order on birthright citizenship in the Oval Office of the White House, Monday, Jan. 20, 2025, in Washington.
President Donald Trump signs an executive order to on birthright citizenship in the Oval Office on Jan. 20, 2025. The U.S. Supreme Court will consider the legality of Trump's effort to limit birthright citizenship, another immigration policy that could affect schools.
Evan Vucci/AP