Law & Courts

FCC Rule Boosts Education on Digital TV

By Andrew Trotter — January 10, 2006 4 min read

A recent accord between the television industry and children’s advocacy groups over federal rules promises to ease the transition of TV programming for children into the era of digital broadcasting.

Until last month, the two sides had been in dispute over the industry’s obligation to provide expanded educational and informational fare for children younger than 16. Congress mandated those obligations in general terms in the Children’s Television Act of 1990 but left many important details to be worked out by the Federal Communications Commission.

The FCC has issued several sets of rules that have made the broadcaster’s obligation’s increasingly precise, such as an order in 1996 that said that TV stations, to renew their broadcast licenses, must broadcast a minimum of three hours of children’s educational and informational programming at popular times every week, among other requirements.

In September 2004, the FCC issued rules, to take effect at the start of 2006, to beef up the requirements for stations that broadcast in a digital rather than traditional analog format.

Put simply, digital television encodes the information that makes up a TV picture in the ones and zeros of computers, while analog television turns picture information into a radio signal with varying frequencies.

As they adopt digital technology, broadcasters are able to use a technique known as multicasting, in which multiple programs can be beamed over a tiny ribbon of the broadcast spectrum that formerly could carry only a single analog broadcast. The digital streams can include Web-based content and other services, as well as conventional television shows.

Under current law, all of the nation’s 1,700 TV stations must shift to digital transmission by 2009; already, about 1,300 local stations have both analog and digital broadcasts.

The FCC rules on multicasting, which were to go into effect Jan. 1, require that broadcast licensees add another three hours of children’s educational or informational shows per week for each additional 24-hour multicast channel.

The rules also put strict limits on commercial messages during educational programs and barred the use of animated characters to sell products to children.

Both broadcasters and children’s advocacy groups have filed lawsuits that threatened to bog down the rules in the federal courts, by challenging whether the FCC has properly fulfilled its obligations under the act.

Most galling to the television industry, the new rules would bar TV stations from pre-empting more than 10 percent of their children’s programs. Under the rule currently in effect, the stations have considerable flexibility to pre-empt that schedule for other shows, typically weekend broadcasts of sports.

In a breakthrough, however, the recent agreement compromises on some key issues, while putting the lawsuits on hold.

A Template for Revisions

By potentially ending the lawsuits and giving the FCC a template for revising its rules in a way both sides will accept, the December agreement “will serve children very well,” said Gloria Tristani, a former FCC commissioner and one of the negotiators for the Children’s Media Policy Coalition, which includes various medical and child-advocacy groups, including the National PTA.

The industry agreed to accept the same requirements for educational and informational programming for each additional channel that is created using multicasting techniques. The children’s advocates agreed to accept the use of characters to sell products to children on certain Web sites, with Web addresses displayed on shows that include those characters.

“There will be protections for children against excessive advertisements—not perfect protections, but you always may give up something when you reach an agreement,” said Ms. Tristani, who was a Democratic member of the FCC from 1997 to 2001 who is now the managing director of the Washington-based communications office of the United Church of Christ.

The accord also gives the television industry a boon by not placing limits on the pre-emption of the children’s programming. “That was absolutely key,” said Shannon Jacobs, a spokeswoman for CBS, a division of Viacom Inc. “Given the amount of sports we had on Saturday morning, that was really important for us—we were happy to be able to get that flexibility back.”

But the FCC must still accept the deal. In its Dec. 16 order, the commission said it would delay the new rules until March 1, giving it time to seek public comment on the parties’ recommendation and make its own determination on proposed changes to the rules.

“[W]e greatly appreciate a joint recommendation from these previously adverse interests and will give their recommendation serious consideration,” the commission’s statement said.

Even if the FCC does not revise the rules by March 1, the agreement between broadcasters and children’s advocates requires that the TV industry comply with the terms of the accord by then.

Related Tags:


This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Law & Courts Webinar
The Future of Criminal Justice Reform: A Sphere Education Initiative Conversation
America’s criminal justice system is in crisis and calls for reform are dominating the national debate. Join Cato’s Sphere Education Initiative and Education Week for a webinar on criminal justice and policing featuring the nation’s
Content provided by Cato Institute
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Student Well-Being Webinar
Equity, Care and Connection: New SEL Tools and Practices to Support Students and Adults
As school districts plan to welcome students back into buildings for the upcoming school year, this is the perfect time to take a hard look at both our practices and our systems to build a
Content provided by Panorama Education
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Classroom Technology Webinar
Here to Stay – Pandemic Lessons for EdTech in Future Development
What technology is needed in a post pandemic district? Learn how changes in education will impact development of new technologies.
Content provided by AWS

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Law & Courts Court Restores Officers' Immunity Over Seizure of High School Athletes in Peeping Probe
A federal appeals court ruled in the case of two campus officers involved in detaining football camp participants for hours of questioning.
4 min read
Image of cellphones.
Law & Courts Appeals Court Weighs Idaho Law Barring Transgender Female Students From Girls' Sports
The three-judge federal court panel reviews a lower-court ruling that blocked the controversial statute and said it was likely unconstitutional.
4 min read
Image of a gavel.
Marilyn Nieves/E+
Law & Courts Federal Appeals Court Backs Socioeconomic-Based Admissions Plan for Boston 'Exam Schools'
The court denies an injunction to block the plan for next year and says considering family income in admissions is likely constitutional.
3 min read
Image shows lady justice standing before an open law book and gavel.
iStock/Getty Images Plus
Law & Courts U.S. Supreme Court Wary About Extending School Authority Over Student Internet Speech
In arguments, the justices looked for a narrow way to decide a case about the discipline of a cheerleader over a profane Snapchat message.
7 min read
Members of the Supreme Court pose for a group photo at the Supreme Court in Washington on April 23, 2021.
Members of the U.S. Supreme Court pose for a group photo at the court on April 23. The justices heard arguments Wednesday in a major case on student speech.
Erin Schaff/The New York Times via AP