School & District Management

Project to Vet Think Tanks’ Work With Eye Out for Ideological Bias

By Lynn Olson — March 21, 2006 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

A just-launched project will review education reports released by private think tanks for the quality of their research, methodology, and conclusions, using expert academic reviewers.

The Think Tank Review Project is a joint collaboration of the Arizona State University Education Policy Studies Laboratory and the University of Colorado’s Education and Public Interest Center. It has pledged to provide “expert reviews” to policymakers, the news media, and the public within two weeks of a report’s release. The first such reviews—of three reports released since January—were posted online last week at http://thinktankreview.org.

The project reflects a growing concern among researchers that studies on hot-button issues increasingly appear in public without having undergone an independent peer review by scholars. The project’s creators particularly hope to provide a counterpoint to what they view as a proliferation of education reports coming from think tanks that were founded to advance particular ideological points of view. (“Research: Researching the Researchers,” Feb. 20, 2002.)

View Think Tank Project Reviews from Arizona State University’s Education Policy Studies Laboratory.

“Despite garnering media attention and their influence with many legislators, reports released by private think tanks are often of very poor quality,” Alex Molnar, the director of the Education Policy Studies Laboratory, said in a press release announcing the project.

“Many think tank reports are little more than ideological argumentation dressed up as research,” he said. “We believe that policymakers, reporters, and the public will greatly benefit from having qualified social scientists provide reviews of these documents in a timely fashion.”

Neutrality Debated

BRIC ARCHIVE

Ellen Condliffe Lagemann, a professor of education at Harvard University’s graduate school of education and a former president of the Chicago-based Spencer Foundation, which focuses on education research, called the project a “much-needed development.”

“It’s very difficult for laypeople to react critically to the claims made in reports published by these organizations,” she said in an e-mail. “We all need help in understanding some of the complicated design issues that arise in evaluating programs, judging the significance of different test scores, and the like.”

But the project itself has raised eyebrows about whether it will be bias-free. Its funding comes from the Great Lakes Center for Education Research and Practice, an East Lansing, Mich.-based group founded by the Michigan Education Association, an affiliate of the National Education Association. (“Union-Funded Study Finds Fault With High-Stakes Testing,” Sept. 28, 2005.)

BRIC ARCHIVE

While it’s useful and appropriate for researchers and advocates to monitor and critique each other’s work, said Frederick M. Hess, the director of education policy studies at the conservative American Enterprise Institute in Washington and the executive editor of Education Next,the Arizona State scholars “are more than a little ideological in their own right.”

“Even aside from the issue of funding, these are individuals who have clearly articulated policy preferences,” he said. “While that’s fine, they’re certainly not neutral authorities. I’d hope that media treat these ‘critiques’ accordingly and carefully weigh their claims.”

Kevin Welner, the director of the Education and Public Interest Center at the University of Colorado at Boulder, said: “Each of our reviewers is an independent scholar. I do not think the reviewers even know the source of the funding. There is absolutely no pressure being exerted by the Great Lakes Center on the content of the reviews.”

The project’s first three reviews cover a report by the Cato Institute and the Milton & Rose D. Friedman Foundation, on the District of Columbia voucher program; a report by the Manhattan Institute for Policy Studies evaluating Florida’s plan to end social promotion, which later appeared as an article in Education Next; and a report by the Wisconsin Policy Research Institute on the status of high school education in that state.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the March 22, 2006 edition of Education Week as Project to Vet Think Tanks’ Work With Eye Out for Ideological Bias

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Classroom Technology Webinar
Seamless Integrations for Engagement in the Classroom
Learn how to seamlessly integrate new technologies into your classroom to support student engagement. 
Content provided by GoGuardian
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Recruitment & Retention Webinar
Be the Change: Strategies to Make Year-Round Hiring Happen
Learn how to leverage actionable insights to diversify your recruiting efforts and successfully deploy a year-round recruiting plan.
Content provided by Frontline
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Equity & Diversity Webinar
Critical Ways Leaders Can Build a Culture of Belonging and Achievement
Explore innovative practices for using technology to build an environment of belonging and achievement for all staff and students.
Content provided by DreamBox Learning

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

School & District Management 'How Are You?' Teachers and Principals Benefit From Check-Ins, Too
Check-ins are an important part of social-emotional learning for students. But what about check-ins for the adults in the school?
Image of a teacher in a classroom.
E+
School & District Management Opinion 3 Shifts That Will Benefit Every New Ed. Leader
We need leaders who can develop shared visions of what school can be.
Jennifer Perry Cheatham, Rodney Thomas & Adam Parrott-Sheffer
4 min read
conceptual image of people coming together to form a lightbulb
DigitalVision Vectors/Getty
School & District Management After Student's Death, L.A. Schools to Carry Overdose Antidote
The nation’s second-largest school district will provide all its schools with a medication that can reverse opioid overdoses.
1 min read
Students and community members place flowers and candles at Helen Bernstein High School where a teenage girl died of an overdose on Thursday, Sept. 15, 2022, in Los Angeles. Authorities said multiple Los Angeles teenagers have overdosed on pills likely laced with fentanyl over the past month, including the 15-year-old girl who died on the high school campus.
Students and community members place flowers and candles at Helen Bernstein High School where a girl died of an overdose earlier this month in Los Angeles. Authorities said multiple Los Angeles teenagers have overdosed on pills likely laced with fentanyl over the past month, including the 15-year-old girl who died on the high school campus.
Jason Armond/Los Angeles Times via AP
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Whitepaper
Glimpse Into the Future of Education
World renowned futurist Gerd Leonhard and Promethean's Head of International Education Strategy explore the evolution of education.
Content provided by Promethean