Equity & Diversity

Meals-Eligibility Option May Complicate Data Collection

By Charles Edwards — October 02, 2013 2 min read

The rollout of a new “community eligibility option” for federal school meals programs has gone smoothly, but one of the new option’s major advantages—the elimination of family income-eligibility surveys—has generated difficulties for other federal and state education programs in states participating so far.

Historically, the ready availability of free- and reduced-price lunch counts has made such data a favorite tool for allocating poverty-targeted federal aid among schools, as well as for disaggregating achievement of low-income students for accountability purposes. In fact, some states use school lunch data in their own education funding formulas.

Under the new option, being used in 10 states and the District of Columbia so far, schools are barred from collecting income-survey forms in conjunction with the meals program. That’s proved troubling for the federal Title I program, which directs money to low-income schools to provide additional services for low-achieving students.

Only ‘Directly Certified’ Children

School lunch data play no part in determining how much Title I funding each district receives, but play a critical role in how districts subdivide their aid among individual schools. Although districts are allowed to use other types of poverty data for that purpose, “it’s next to impossible to get that [data] for a school attendance area within a district,” Montana’s state Title I director, B.J. Granbery, said at a conference of state Title I directors held in Washington this summer.

See Also

For more on how USDA rules are affecting school meals, see “Rollout of School Meals Option Popular, Report Says.”

A similar difficulty involves disaggregation of student-achievement data for “economically disadvantaged,” students, a key subgroup that must be tracked for accountability under the No Child Left Behind Act.

In a school participating in the new option, only children who have been “directly certified” as eligible because

they already take part in other federal need-based programs can be identified with certainty as economically disadvantaged.

That provision will result in a mismatch with low-income data derived from traditional school lunch counts in other schools, and it may pose problems for “growth models” that depend on tracking individual students’ achievement by demographic characteristics.

A More Direct Approach

Some states have adopted a more direct approach to obtaining comparable income data: conducting a separate family-income survey divorced from the meals program. For example, in 2012-13, Kentucky and Michigan went that route.

The U.S. Department of Education issued preliminary guidance in 2012 suggesting work-arounds, and it is preparing comprehensive guidance for release later this fall.

At the summer Title I conference, Todd Stephenson, a grants management specialist for the department office that oversees Title I, emphasized that the agency is determined that data issues will not inhibit adoption of the community-eligibility option.

“If there is only thing you take from what I am saying, it is this: We do not want, nor do we think, that Title I should be the reason a school does not select [the option],” he said. “We believe that Title I can work as well with the school lunch program ... as it has previously.”

A version of this article appeared in the October 02, 2013 edition of Education Week as USDA Rule Shift Throws Data-Collection Curveball


Jobs The EdWeek Top School Jobs Virtual Career Fair
Find teaching jobs and other jobs in K-12 education at the EdWeek Top School Jobs virtual career fair.
Teaching Live Online Discussion How to Develop Powerful Project-Based Learning
How do you prepare students to be engaged, active, and empowered young adults? Creating a classroom atmosphere that encourages students to pursue critical inquiry and the many skills it requires demands artful planning on the
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Student Well-Being Webinar
A Safe Return to Schools is Possible with Testing
We are edging closer to a nationwide return to in-person learning in the fall. However, vaccinations alone will not get us through this. Young children not being able to vaccinate, the spread of new and
Content provided by BD

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Equity & Diversity From Our Research Center What Do Teachers Think About Discussing Racism in Class? We Asked Them
The new nationally representative EdWeek Research Center survey also asked educators whether they believe systemic racism exists.
5 min read
Illustration of students and a teacher.
DigitalVision Vectors
Equity & Diversity Opinion Are Our Schools Any Closer to Equity?
Schools are trying to focus on equity, but a slew of new legislation is preventing that focus from becoming a reality.
Sean Slade & Alyssa Gallagher
4 min read
E20D8BC6 ED5F 43B7 817C 5FA00DCA5904
Equity & Diversity Spotlight Spotlight on Critical Race Theory
In this Spotlight, learn what critical race theory is, what it isn't, and how it's a practice, not a curriculum.
Mary Hassdyk for Education Week
Equity & Diversity Opinion I Am an Indian American Man. I Had Anti-Racist Work to Do
When adults reflect on who they are and where they come from, their awareness leads to better learning outcomes for their students.
Anil Hurkadli
5 min read
Abstract drawing of the profile of a head, clouds of thoughts and radiance from the eyes.
Elena Medvedeva/iStock/Getty Images Plus