School & District Management

Finances at Issue in Delay Of Phila. Schools Takeover

By Catherine Gewertz — December 12, 2001 3 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

Pennsylvania’s governor and Philadelphia’s mayor have delayed until Dec. 21 the impending state takeover of the city’s schools in an attempt to make more cordial and cooperative a shift of power that many Philadelphians already view as an unfriendly intrusion.

The announcement by Republican Gov. Mark S. Schweiker and Democratic Mayor John F. Street postponed by three weeks the surrender of Philadelphia’s troubled schools to the state. It came after a week of intense negotiations, first between the mayor’s and governor’s top deputies, and then, on the deadline day of Nov. 30, one-on-one between the leaders themselves.

With only hours left before the anticipated Dec. 1 takeover, the two men emerged and announced the extension.

“This is a monumental decision in the history of this city,” Mayor Street said. “We believe we should make every effort to resolve the ambiguity and the differences we have. We’re only going to do this once.”

Gov. Schweiker noted that there was “common ground,” but said that the two sides needed to sort out financial disagreements.

‘High-Stakes Decisions’

The delay surprised many observers, since both sides had characterized the deadline as firm. But the sticking points appeared to be significant enough to require more time for exploration.

“I don’t know if it will make the result better, but it creates the potential for a better result,” said Pedro A. Ramos, the president of the Philadelphia school board and a participant in the negotiations. “These are very high-stakes decisions, and they should be based on the best facts available.”

Both sides acknowledged that the key stumbling point was money—how much is needed to finance the district, how much the state and the city each can contribute, how much savings the district can realize through cost cutting. The school system faces a $200 million deficit this year alone in its $1.7 billion budget.

“We had questions about how they arrived at their financial numbers, and they had questions about ours,” said Steve Aaron, the governor’s spokesman. “The [governor and the mayor] felt that if we could take 21 days and use that time to do a closer analysis, it would be time well spent if it could lead to a conclusion that had the city and state partnering.”

Gov. Schweiker has proposed that the state contribute an additional $75 million a year to the city schools, but has suggested that state legislators would balk unless Philadelphia matched that sum. City officials, however, fear that raising that amount might come at the expense of other city services.

In the weeks leading up to the Nov. 30 deadline, various groups of parents, labor-union members, clergy, teachers, and students staged demonstrations in opposition to the part of the state’s plan that has drawn national notice: its intent to allow private school-management firms to run 60 of the district’s worst-performing schools. (“Phila. Takeover Deadline Marked by Protests,” Dec. 5, 2001.)

That would turn the 210,000-student district into the biggest laboratory yet for school privatization.

Mr. Schweiker’s plan calls for those schools to be run in partnership with community organizations. Edison Schools Inc., the country’s largest private operator of public schools, would likely play a powerful consulting role for the new commission that is to replace the mayorally appointed school board. The New York City-based company also could manage clusters of schools if chosen to do so.

The issue of how to pay for the city’s schools has been a sore one for many years as Philadelphia, with a heavy share of poor students, struggled to find enough money to run its schools as its costs rose. Many Philadelphians are looking to the Pennsylvania legislature for what they say is the only lasting answer: a statewide tax overhaul that would give the state a greater share of school finance and substitute a higher personal-income tax for local districts’ dependence on property taxes.

Related Tags:

A version of this article appeared in the December 12, 2001 edition of Education Week as Finances at Issue in Delay Of Phila. Schools Takeover

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Professional Development Webinar
Grow Leaders, Keep Teachers: Leadership Development as a Staffing Strategy
Find out how to turn leadership development into a staffing strategy and grow your next generation of school leaders from within.
Content provided by Frontline Education
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
Teaching Webinar
Closing the Practice Gap: Essential Insights for Leaders
Three instructional experts will share strategies for making students’ reading and math practice more engaging and impactful this year.
Content provided by Renaissance
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
The Principal's Role in Collective Efficacy and Student Outcomes
Learn practical strategies that help principals translate their confidence into stronger collective teacher efficacy and student outcomes.
Content provided by Otus

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

School & District Management Should Districts Pay Vendors Based on Student Outcomes? What the Research Says
Tying vendor pay to outcomes can help boost student achievement, researchers find.
4 min read
ISTEJune30AA
Education technology companies market their products and services at the ISTE Live 26 + ASCD Annual Conference in late June in Orlando, Fla. Some school districts are now insisting that payments to ed-tech companies be linked to evidence that their products and services improve student learning.
Marvin Joseph/Education Week
School & District Management Who Inspires You? Nominate Them For EdWeek Leaders To Learn From
Nominations are due at midnight Sept. 8, 2026. The next cohort of honorees will be recognized in February 2027.
3 min read
tk
The 2026 EdWeek Leaders To Learn From.
Education Week
School & District Management From Our Research Center 75% of Educators Expect Student Behavior to Be a Challenge This Year. What Else?
Students themselves are top of mind, even as districts face financial headwinds and broader uncertainty.
6 min read
Image of a person on a unicycle juggling icons representing: computers, calendar, planning documents, financial documents, desk with lunch bag and coffee mug.
Robert Neubecker for Education Week
School & District Management Opinion Ed. Leaders Must Stop Getting Distracted by the Shiniest New Idea. Here’s How
Effective school leadership depends on slowing down, asking better questions, and reflecting.
4 min read
shutterstock 2421821495
Shutterstock