Find your next job fast at the Jan. 28 Virtual Career Fair. Register now.
Education

Survey Shows Split Among E-Rate Applicants

By Ian Quillen — October 19, 2012 2 min read

Applicants to E-Rate, the federal funding program that subsidizes school and library Internet-related purchases, are torn over whether the program should continue to fund internal maintenance and network infrastructure projects, according to a new survey results released by E-Rate consultants Funds for Learning.

The report, released last week, also found that a hefty majority of applicants felt the continuing shift to digital content and the use of student-owned computing devices would put an increasing demand on the Federal Communications Commission program, which is currently funded at $2.3 billion annually through revenues from the Universal Service Fund.

The survey of more than 600 E-Rate applicants found that respondents were split nearly in half on whether the program should continue to fund Priority 2, infrastructure-related projects at schools with the neediest student populations, or focus on Priority 1 initiatives that help support projects at all schools to acquire or strengthen outside Internet connections.

The question is but one data point in an avalanche of information in the report that has about 20 pages of direct survey information and analysis, and 40 pages of appendices. But the division, 52 to 48 percent in favor of doing away with Priority 2 funding, may show a growing tension over the program’s overall future, which at its current funding level may not be able even to honor all Priority 1 funding requests in coming years.

About two-thirds of applicants that receive Priority 2 funding favored continuing it, as did one third of applicants who only currently receive Priority 1 funding.

“It stands to reason that applicants who currently receive P2 funding rely on it and would not choose to eliminate it,” reads analysis from the report. “What is perhaps more surprising is that one-third of applicants who do not currently receive P2 funding still support it.”

Meanwhile, 88 percent of respondents said a shift toward using more digital content in schools and allowing students to consume that content using their own devices would increase their schools’ demand for E-Rate funded projects. That shift, perhaps ironically, has been driven in many districts by a desire to limit district spending, and is now also picking up steam with the adoption of the common standards and their provisions for online testing and digital content use.

Perhaps less surprisingly, 94 percent of respondents labeled the program as “critical” to the district’s success, about two-thirds said it needed to continue and receive more funding, and four in nine respondents said they are using or have plans to use E-Rate funding to extend use of technology resources to students or community members after school hours.

In addition to a lead section on the importance of E-Rate, the report also includes sections on: the relative importance of speed, flexibility, amount, and predictability of the fulfillment of E-Rate funding requests; respondents’ own future technology purchasing plans; recommendations for potential changes to E-Rate; and how to prioritize E-Rate funding across different services.

Respondents to the survey, or at least the 434 who identified their school affiliation, skewed slightly toward larger school districts than the total number of E-Rate applicants, were slightly more likely to have received P2 funding, and were far less likely to utilize a consultant for their E-Rate application, according to the report.

A version of this news article first appeared in the Digital Education blog.

Events

Teaching Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table With Education Week: How Educators Can Respond to a Post-Truth Era
How do educators break through the noise of disinformation to teach lessons grounded in objective truth? Join to find out.
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
The 4 Biggest Challenges of MTSS During Remote Learning: How Districts Are Adapting
Leaders share ways they have overcome the biggest obstacles of adapting a MTSS or RTI framework in a hybrid or remote learning environment.
Content provided by Panorama Education
Student Well-Being Online Summit Keeping Students and Teachers Motivated and Engaged
Join experts to learn how to address teacher morale, identify students with low engagement, and share what is working in remote learning.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Join us for our NBOE 2021 Winter Teacher Virtual Interview Fair!
Newark, New Jersey
Newark Public Schools
Special Education Teacher
Chicago, Illinois
JCFS Chicago
Assistant Director of Technical Solutions
Working from home
EdGems Math LLC

Read Next

Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: January 13, 2021
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Obituary In Memory of Michele Molnar, EdWeek Market Brief Writer and Editor
EdWeek Market Brief Associate Editor Michele Molnar, who was instrumental in launching the publication, succumbed to cancer.
5 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: December 9, 2020
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: Stories You May Have Missed
A collection of articles from the previous week that you may have missed.
8 min read