Find your next job fast at the Jan. 28 Virtual Career Fair. Register now.
Education

Survey Respondents Doubt Common Tests Will Be Ready On Time

By Catherine Gewertz — July 23, 2012 2 min read

Two big groups of states are working away to design tests for the common standards, but some Washington insiders aren’t brimming with optimism that the tests will be ready as promised, or that districts will know how to put them to good use.

A new survey from Whiteboard Advisors, a Washington-based consulting group, finds that nearly half of a small group of “insiders” surveyed doubt that the two federally funded assessment consortia will roll the tests out by 2014-15 as planned.

Nearly half, as well, see a big speed bump in districts’ ability to implement the new tests well. And none gave high marks to schools’ readiness to do what the common standards expect of them.

Those are the bottom-line findings from the survey, released late last week. It examines the views of 50 to 75 people, a number Whiteboard calls “a handful.” But given where that handful is located—in key policy-shaping places—it’s worth knowing what they’re thinking.

The published survey includes only a small sampling of respondents’ reasoning, but there are tidbits of interest there. One respondent, for instance, says the tests will likely be late because there will have to be “time allowed for back and forth once the assessments are publicly available. Everyone will have their own issues (which will differ by state) that folks will want to negotiate.”

When it comes to the biggest problems facing the common assessments, Whiteboard’s survey group named districts’ ability to pull off sound implementation as the No. 1 challenge (45 percent). Right behind that is lack of adequate technology infrastructure (20 percent), followed by disagreement among states over the cut scores (15 percent).

Some ominous—and acidic—comments turned up from respondents when they were asked about the biggest overlooked threats to the common tests.

“They are over-promised,” said one respondent. “Many in the field will be disappointed by how much they look like the current generation of assessments.”

“Lack of planning in low‐standards states for how poor the results will be.”

“November election. If GOP sweeps, these both fade away, like a lanced boil.”

”.. potential confusion among districts over common-core-aligned assessments and those by commercial vendors that claim alignment for marketing purposes, but are not actually aligned.”

“Cost. [State education agencies] spend more on assessments than anything else. Even a couple‐dollar increase in per‐pupil costs means millions of dollars annually. Don’t be surprised if the joint assessments come in more expensive than initially anticipated and states quietly develop buyer’s remorse, start asking why they are giving up their less‐expensive, familiar, state‐developed tests; and then look for a way out of the consortium.”

Ouch.

Insiders weren’t overflowing with optimism, either, about schools’ preparedness to teach the common core. Eighty percent rated that readiness a 1 or 2 on a scale of 5, with 1 being “not ready” and 5 being “extremely ready.” Twenty percent gave schools a 3, and no one gave them a 4 or 5.

Why so little faith? Many reasons: too few people understand the key instructional shifts required; the school culture still holds some kids to higher expectations than others; the heavy lift to develop good curriculum for these standards; and this sweeping one: “The system is unclear and un‐implementable.”

A version of this news article first appeared in the Curriculum Matters blog.

Events

This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
Branding Matters. Learn From the Pros Why and How
Learn directly from the pros why K-12 branding and marketing matters, and how to do it effectively.
Content provided by EdWeek Top School Jobs
This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Sponsor
School & District Management Webinar
How to Make Learning More Interactive From Anywhere
Join experts from Samsung and Boxlight to learn how to make learning more interactive from anywhere.
Content provided by Samsung
Teaching Live Online Discussion A Seat at the Table With Education Week: How Educators Can Respond to a Post-Truth Era
How do educators break through the noise of disinformation to teach lessons grounded in objective truth? Join to find out.

EdWeek Top School Jobs

BASE Program Site Director
Thornton, CO, US
Adams 12 Five Star Schools
Director of Information Technology
Montpelier, Vermont
Washington Central UUSD
Great Oaks AmeriCorps Fellow August 2021 - June 2022
New York City, New York (US)
Great Oaks Charter Schools
Director of Athletics
Farmington, Connecticut
Farmington Public Schools

Read Next

Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: January 13, 2021
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Obituary In Memory of Michele Molnar, EdWeek Market Brief Writer and Editor
EdWeek Market Brief Associate Editor Michele Molnar, who was instrumental in launching the publication, succumbed to cancer.
5 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: December 9, 2020
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: Stories You May Have Missed
A collection of articles from the previous week that you may have missed.
8 min read