Education Opinion

Doing Time in High School: The Need for Tiered Disciplinary Systems

By Ilana Garon — May 28, 2014 3 min read

Once, in the midst of a conversation with a particularly disheartened student, I agreed that high school was like jail.

“They do have some similarities,” I acknowledged. “Before you can go on to better things, you have to do your time...and unfortunately, there’s no early release for good behavior.” The kid sat in a desk facing mine, his face planted on his desktop in a gesture of forlornness, and groaned in response.

Our comparison was more apt than I realized. Recent articles about the so-called “school-to-prison pipeline” point to a chronic problem in public schools across America, wherein small infractions are criminalized and heavily punished, pushing students--particularly students of color--onto a path from the educational system to the penal system. One such student, featured prominently in the ACLU’s challenge to such policies, is Kyle Thompson, a Michigan freshman who after play-fighting with a teacher over a note, which he duly turned over once he realized the situation was getting out of hand, was subsequently suspended from public school for an entire year due to Michigan’s zero-tolerance policy.

In this blog, I’ve often written about the need for more strict and structured discipline in schools. A situation like Kyle Thompson’s is NOT what I have in mind.

In many public schools, there is no accountability for students’ misbehavior, largely because there is no tiered system of discipline--no “punishment” between calling a parent (an idle threat, in my view and that of many of my fellow teachers, since parentally imposed discipline is inconsistent) and suspension from school. Due to budget cuts, lack of free classrooms in over-crowded schools, teachers and administrators spread too thin with responsibilities outside of their job descriptions, an overall lack of enforcing power, and system-wide policies that penalize schools for dolling out any disciplinary measures by giving them poor ratings, the days of “normal” punishments are a thing of the past: These would have included lunch detention, after school detention, responsibility for performing cleaning and maintenance around school (Catholic schools call this “JUG”), small percentage deductions from overall grade-point averages (my own high school’s surprisingly effective deterrent against misbehavior), loss of in-school privileges, etc.

Discipline ends up being a sort of “zero to 60" system, and two negative outcomes emerge as a result: (1) Without suspending a student, schools have no way of holding students accountable for poor in-class behaviors, and thus (in an effort not to penalize minor infractions in a draconian manner) send an implicit message to students that such behaviors are permissible; (2) When ultimately problems escalate, and students’ negative behaviors can be addressed only through suspensions and other more severe disciplinary policies, the students’ chances of getting their credits, graduating, becoming gainfully employed, and even avoiding prison are severely undermined.

The need for discipline in the public schools is a fact, and I disagree with anyone who claims that good instruction or classroom management eliminate the need for discipline, as some commenters on my blog have suggested in the past. Kids need structure, and they respect administrators and teachers more when clear behavioral standards are stated and upheld, with consistent consequences for not following along. Neither a total absence of consequences, nor overly punitive, inflexible policies serve students well. School should not be jail; it should be a safe place for kids to learn not only academic subjects, but also how to conduct themselves as responsible adults and productive members of society.

The opinions expressed in View From the Bronx: An Urban Teacher’s Perspective are strictly those of the author(s) and do not reflect the opinions or endorsement of Editorial Projects in Education, or any of its publications.

Let us know what you think!

We’re looking for feedback on our new site to make sure we continue to provide you the best experience.


This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Future of Work Webinar
Digital Literacy Strategies to Promote Equity
Our new world has only increased our students’ dependence on technology. This makes digital literacy no longer a “nice to have” but a “need to have.” How do we ensure that every student can navigate
Content provided by Learning.com
Mathematics Online Summit Teaching Math in a Pandemic
Attend this online summit to ask questions about how COVID-19 has affected achievement, instruction, assessment, and engagement in math.
School & District Management Webinar Examining the Evidence: Catching Kids Up at a Distance
As districts, schools, and families navigate a new normal following the abrupt end of in-person schooling this spring, students’ learning opportunities vary enormously across the nation. Access to devices and broadband internet and a secure

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Speech Therapists
Lancaster, PA, US
Lancaster Lebanon IU 13
Elementary Teacher
Madison, Wisconsin
One City Schools
Elementary Teacher - Scholars Academy
Madison, Wisconsin
One City Schools

Read Next

Education Obituary In Memory of Michele Molnar, EdWeek Market Brief Writer and Editor
EdWeek Market Brief Associate Editor Michele Molnar, who was instrumental in launching the publication, succumbed to cancer.
5 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: December 9, 2020
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: Stories You May Have Missed
A collection of articles from the previous week that you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Briefly Stated Briefly Stated: Stories You May Have Missed
A collection of stories from the previous week that you may have missed.
8 min read