Ohio Forces Spar Over Constitution

By Michele McNeil — January 30, 2007 1 min read
  • Save to favorites
  • Print

‘High-quality education’ sought via amendment

A coalition of 12 Ohio public school groups is moving to take the issue to voters by placing a constitutional amendment on the November ballot that would guarantee students a “high-quality public education.”

James E. Betts, a spokesman for the coalition, called Getting It Right for Ohio’s Future, said parents and students no longer can wait for lawmakers to act.

“The General Assembly has certainly made some changes, but they haven’t provided a systematic overhaul the court required,” Mr. Betts said.

The first ruling came in 1997 in response to a school funding lawsuit filed six years earlier. The state’s high court found that Ohio’s system of paying for its schools was unconstitutional because it relied too much on property taxes, forced some districts to borrow money for basic operations, and didn’t provide enough money for facilities, according to the National Access Network, a New York City-based organization that tracks such litigation.

In 2003, the court gave up jurisdiction of the case, thus ending the legal battle.

The proposed amendment would establish the right to a high-quality education and charge the 19-member state board of education with determining—subject to a legislative override—how much such an education system would cost.

Supporters submitted their initial petition for the amendment to the Ohio attorney general on Jan. 17. But they will need 400,000 signatures before the question can appear on the Nov. 6 ballot.

Opponents are already lining up.

Gov. Ted Strickland, a Democrat who took office this month, isn’t inclined to support it, said his spokesman, Keith Dailey. The governor will work on a legislative solution.

And the Ohio Roundtable, a public-policy organization, isn’t impressed—or especially diplomatic in its assessment. It already calls the proposed amendment a “power grab” that would put school funding in the hands of an “educational bureaucracy” rather than the elected legislature.

A version of this article appeared in the January 31, 2007 edition of Education Week


This content is provided by our sponsor. It is not written by and does not necessarily reflect the views of Education Week's editorial staff.
Classroom Technology Webinar
How to Leverage Virtual Learning: Preparing Students for the Future
Hear from an expert panel how best to leverage virtual learning in your district to achieve your goals.
Content provided by Class
English-Language Learners Webinar AI and English Learners: What Teachers Need to Know
Explore the role of AI in multilingual education and its potential limitations.
Education Webinar The K-12 Leader: Data and Insights Every Marketer Needs to Know
Which topics are capturing the attention of district and school leaders? Discover how to align your content with the topics your target audience cares about most. 

EdWeek Top School Jobs

Teacher Jobs
Search over ten thousand teaching jobs nationwide — elementary, middle, high school and more.
View Jobs
Principal Jobs
Find hundreds of jobs for principals, assistant principals, and other school leadership roles.
View Jobs
Administrator Jobs
Over a thousand district-level jobs: superintendents, directors, more.
View Jobs
Support Staff Jobs
Search thousands of jobs, from paraprofessionals to counselors and more.
View Jobs

Read Next

Education Briefly Stated: September 20, 2023
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education From Our Research Center What's on the Minds of Educators, in Charts
Politics, gender equity, and technology—how teachers and administrators say these issues are affecting the field.
1 min read
Stylized illustration of a pie chart
Traci Daberko for Education Week
Education Briefly Stated: August 30, 2023
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
8 min read
Education Briefly Stated: August 23, 2023
Here's a look at some recent Education Week articles you may have missed.
9 min read